General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Chelation-A Five Star Review

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 5 posts · 346 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
29 November 2003
Last activity
29 November 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
346
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.fivestarreview.com/chelation.HTM

    Andrew Lipton, D.O.

    Chelation Therapy (CT) has been used for nearly fifty years for removal of
    toxic heavy metals, and alternatively for reduction of atherosclerotic
    symptoms. EDTA is an acronym for magnesium disodium ethylene diamine
    tetracetic acid. It's FDA approved use is for acute or chronic lead
    poisoning. However, since it's beginnings in clinical use, there have been
    claims as to it's benefit in treating everything from arthritis to cancer.

    Other "investigational" uses include: hypoparathyroidism, scleroderma,
    hypercholesterolemia, hypercalcemia, cardiac arrhythmias, coronary
    atherosclerotic heart disease, and peripheral vascular disease. 1

    Most patients are interested in chelation for its effects on the
    cardiovascular system, but the antioxidant effects of CT benefit every system.
    Many patients feel a reduction of angina, claudication, and shortness of
    breath following a course of CT. Many patients also feel a dramatic improvement
    in energy. The treatment course consists of approximately 30-50, two to three
    hour IV treatments, depending on the severity of the complaint. Treatments can
    be administered once, twice or three times a week, again depending on the
    severity of complaint. The IV basically consists of EDTA, ascorbic acid,
    magnesium, and B vitamins. The IV therapy is also supplemented with oral
    antioxidants and minerals. This treatment combined with lifestyle changes has
    been effective for many patients in reducing their blood pressure, cholesterol,
    and improving cardiovascular symptoms. Essentially, CT does not "cure"
    cardiovascular disease, but may slow progression or even reverse the disease
    process. At the very least it is a powerful antioxidant treatment.

    Subsequent responses from the medical establishment have called the
    use of EDTA for these investigational purposes, useless and quackery. Yet for
    over forty years it has persisted as an alternative treatment for a multitude
    of chronic diseases. There are hundreds of physicians throughout the U.S. that
    use Chelation as an adjunct to their medical practices. Presently the American
    Osteopathic Association’s position is ... "Chelation therapy is recognized as
    medically acceptable only in the management of acute or chronic heavy metal
    poisoning. AOA does not endorse Chelation as useful for other than its
    currently approved and medically accepted uses." 2

    By definition EDTA Chelation is considered "unconventional".
    Unconventional or alternative therapies are defined as medical interventions
    not taught widely at U.S. medical schools or therapies not generally available
    at U.S. hospitals 3 ( i.e. acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, and massage).
    Recent estimates report that more than 500,000 Americans have been received CT,
    with numbers rapidly increasing.

    History: EDTA was first synthesized in the late 1930's in Germany.
    Clinical use in lead poisoning was first reported in 1952, when Michigan
    battery factory workers were discovered to be suffering from lead poisoning.
    They were treated with EDTA. Coincidentally, the patients who had coronary
    artery disease and angina at the time of treatment, had lessening of symptoms
    following treatment. This prompted the first studies to discover other
    therapeutic effects of EDTA. The first study of EDTA in occlusive vascular
    disease was stopped due to lack of immediate results, however it was resumed
    after patients reported subsequent improvements in symptoms and lessening of
    nitrate use. 4 It was found that maximum benefits occurred approximately 3
    months following a course of treatment. 5

    The American college for Advancement in Medicine is one of the
    organizations that promotes Chelation Therapy. ACAM members include
    cardiovascular surgeons and specialists certified in many areas of medicine.
    The world scientific literature contains more than 1000 articles attesting to
    the many effects of EDTA or a brand name

    equivalent, and there are dozens of brands of the same medicine used throughout
    the world. Soviet literature has reported beneficial effects with EDTA on
    cerebral, coronary and peripheral circulation. 6

    Mechanism of Action: EDTA acts first in the vascular compartment by
    binding calcium and other cations and trace elements such as zinc, lead,
    manganese, cadmium, aluminum, and plutonium, transporting them in bound form
    out of the body in urine. 7

    This has been found to increase vascular diameter, decrease vascular tone, and
    decrease peripheral resistance. 7 Other actions of EDTA that may be responsible
    for some of it's effects include decreased platelet aggregation, enhancement of
    the hearts utilization of phosphorous improving function, reduced formation of
    atheromatous plaques, and decreasing extracellular calcium levels with
    reduction of smooth muscle tone similar to calcium channel antagonists. 6 EDTA
    also acts at the level of the cell membrane by removing iron and copper, two
    potent free radicals, which can disrupt membrane architecture, including
    calcium channels. EDTA is also used in solution to keep donor hearts alive
    while awaiting transplant. EDTA removes aluminum which has been implicated in
    Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia. 8

    Research: Hundreds of studies have been performed throughout the years
    on the effects of chelation therapy. Antagonists have stated that these studies
    have too few

    patients, no double blind, and too much patient subjectivity. One of the
    largest studies done to date was a retrospective study of 2870 patients. These
    patients consisted of five groups of degenerative diseases: cardiac disease 29%
    , peripheral vascular disease 39%,

    cerebrovascular and degenerative CNS disease 18%, scleroderma 0.1%, other
    vascular disease 13%.

    After 20 to 30 Chelation treatments these patients showed marked
    improvement in 76.89%, and good improvement in 16.56% in patients with ischemic
    heart disease. There was marked improvement in 91% and good improvement in
    7.6% in patients with peripheral vascular disease. In cerebral vascular disease
    24% showed marked improvement and 30% good improvement. Overall this study
    showed that 75% of all groups had marked improvement. 9 There are many other
    reported EDTA benefit claims which have yet to be substantiated by clinical
    studies.

    Conclusion: EDTA Chelation for the treatment of atherosclerotic disease
    and associated degenerative disease seems to be effective. The literature has
    shown objective and symptomatic improvement in patients receiving EDTA in the
    small amount of patients tested. Recognizing that current therapies for
    atherosclerotic patients are usually invasive and not always effective in the
    relief of symptoms, EDTA should be considered as a possible alternative.

    1. Craven PC, Morelli HF. Chelation Therapy. The West J Med. 1975;122:277-278.

    2. AOA House of Delegates. AOA Position Paper on Chelation Therapy. AOA

    Yearbook and Directory. 1994;518.

    3. Eisenberg DM et al. Unconventional Medicine in the United States,

    Prevalence, Costs and Patterns of Use. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:246-252.

    4. Catcall JR, Palmon F, Aytan N, Meltzer LE. The Treatment of Coronary

    Artery Disease with Disodium EDTA, A Reappraisal. Am J Card .1963;11:501-506.

    5. Cranton EM, Frackelton JP. Current Status of EDTA Chelation Therapy in

    Occlusive Arterial Disease. J of Holistic Med 1982;4:24-33.

    6 Gordon GF, Vance RB. EDTA Chelation Therapy for Arteriosclerosis: History

    and Mechanisms of Action. Osteopathic annals. 1976;4:38-62.

    7. Olszewer E, et al. A pilot double-blind study of sodium-magnesium EDTA in

    peripheral vascular disease. J Natl MedAss. 1982(3);173-177.

    8. Sloth-Nielson J, et al. Arteriographic findings in EDTA Chelation therapy

    on peripheral arteriosclerosis. Am J Surgery.1991;162: 122-125.

    9. Olszewer E, Carter TP. EDTA Chelation in chronic degenerative disease,

    Medical Hypothesis. 1988;27:41-49.

    Andrew Lipton, D.O., Narberth, Pennsylvania, has been offering Chelation
    Therapy as part of his family practice for over five years. About 10% -20% of
    his present practice is devoted to CT. He is on the faculty of the Philadelphia
    College of Osteopathic medicine where he teaches Osteopathic manipulation. Dr.
    Lipton can be contacted at (610)-667-4601.

  2. disease and senile dementia. 8

    Quoted message said:


    Research: Hundreds of studies have been performed throughout the


    years

    Quoted message said:

    on the effects of chelation therapy. Antagonists have stated that these


    studies

    Quoted message said:

    have too few

    patients, no double blind, and too much patient subjectivity. One of the
    largest studies done to date was a retrospective study of 2870 patients.


    These

    Quoted message said:

    patients consisted of five groups of degenerative diseases: cardiac


    disease 29%

    Quoted message said:

    , peripheral vascular disease 39%,

    cerebrovascular and degenerative CNS disease 18%, scleroderma 0.1%, other
    vascular disease 13%.

    After 20 to 30 Chelation treatments these patients showed marked
    improvement in 76.89%, and good improvement in 16.56% in patients with


    ischemic

    Quoted message said:

    heart disease. There was marked improvement in 91% and good improvement


    in

    Quoted message said:

    7.6% in patients with peripheral vascular disease. In cerebral vascular


    disease

    Quoted message said:

    24% showed marked improvement and 30% good improvement. Overall this study
    showed that 75% of all groups had marked improvement. 9

    Proves nothing. This is an almost routine finding when studies are
    performed by enthusiasts who have a financial and professional stake in the
    treatment's success, which are retrospective and uncontrolled, and which
    assess subjective benefits only. If I ask any of my own patients if they
    are feeling better they will try and say so even if most of them do not.
    If someone else asks them they will get more accurate responses. Patients
    are especially be liable to try and find some benefits from treatments that
    are expensive, dramatic, and prolonged, such as applies with 20 chelation
    treatments, as well over that time benefiting from the spontaneous
    improvements that can occur in the conditions referred to here..

    The proof is that sham treatments produce equialent success rates in many
    other treatments that have been claimed by proponents to have 70-80% per
    cent sucess rates.

    Peter Moran

  3. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Chelation-A Five Star Review
    From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden]
    Date: 11/28/2003 11:50 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id:
    <[email hidden]>

    disease and senile dementia. 8

    Quoted message said:


    Research: Hundreds of studies have been performed throughout the


    years

    Quoted message said:

    on the effects of chelation therapy. Antagonists have stated that these


    studies

    Quoted message said:

    have too few

    patients, no double blind, and too much patient subjectivity. One of the
    largest studies done to date was a retrospective study of 2870 patients.


    These

    Quoted message said:

    patients consisted of five groups of degenerative diseases: cardiac


    disease 29%

    Quoted message said:

    , peripheral vascular disease 39%,

    cerebrovascular and degenerative CNS disease 18%, scleroderma 0.1%, other
    vascular disease 13%.

    After 20 to 30 Chelation treatments these patients showed marked
    improvement in 76.89%, and good improvement in 16.56% in patients with


    ischemic

    Quoted message said:

    heart disease. There was marked improvement in 91% and good improvement


    in

    Quoted message said:

    7.6% in patients with peripheral vascular disease. In cerebral vascular


    disease

    Quoted message said:

    24% showed marked improvement and 30% good improvement. Overall this study
    showed that 75% of all groups had marked improvement. 9

    Proves nothing

    LOL. yep only a 91% marked improvement.

    First you shout for studies, then they mean nothing.

    So, people will keep right on doing what works.

    Inspite of witch hunts and dirty tactics of *organized medicine*

    Jan

  4. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Chelation-A Five Star Review
    From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden]
    Date: 11/28/2003 11:50 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id:

    <[email hidden].


    au>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    disease and senile dementia. 8

    Quoted message said:


    Research: Hundreds of studies have been performed throughout the


    years

    Quoted message said:

    on the effects of chelation therapy. Antagonists have stated that these


    studies

    Quoted message said:

    have too few

    patients, no double blind, and too much patient subjectivity. One of


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    largest studies done to date was a retrospective study of 2870


    patients.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    These

    Quoted message said:

    patients consisted of five groups of degenerative diseases: cardiac


    disease 29%

    Quoted message said:

    , peripheral vascular disease 39%,

    cerebrovascular and degenerative CNS disease 18%, scleroderma 0.1%,


    other

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    vascular disease 13%.

    After 20 to 30 Chelation treatments these patients showed marked
    improvement in 76.89%, and good improvement in 16.56% in patients with


    ischemic

    Quoted message said:

    heart disease. There was marked improvement in 91% and good


    improvement

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in

    Quoted message said:

    7.6% in patients with peripheral vascular disease. In cerebral vascular


    disease

    Quoted message said:

    24% showed marked improvement and 30% good improvement. Overall this


    study

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    showed that 75% of all groups had marked improvement. 9

    Proves nothing

    LOL. yep only a 91% marked improvement.

    An improvement of what? Symptoms? I thought AltMed treated the *causes.*

    Quoted message said:

    First you shout for studies, then they mean nothing.

    These do.

    Quoted message said:

    So, people will keep right on doing what works.

    Inspite of witch hunts and dirty tactics of *organized medicine*

    And the lies of AltMed.

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Chelation-A Five Star Review
    From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden]
    Date: 11/28/2003 11:50 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id:
    <[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    disease and senile dementia. 8

    Quoted message said:


    Research: Hundreds of studies have been performed throughout the


    years

    Quoted message said:

    on the effects of chelation therapy. Antagonists have stated that these


    studies

    Quoted message said:

    have too few

    patients, no double blind, and too much patient subjectivity. One of the
    largest studies done to date was a retrospective study of 2870 patients.


    These

    Quoted message said:

    patients consisted of five groups of degenerative diseases: cardiac


    disease 29%

    Quoted message said:

    , peripheral vascular disease 39%,

    cerebrovascular and degenerative CNS disease 18%, scleroderma 0.1%, other
    vascular disease 13%.

    After 20 to 30 Chelation treatments these patients showed marked
    improvement in 76.89%, and good improvement in 16.56% in patients with


    ischemic

    Quoted message said:

    heart disease. There was marked improvement in 91% and good improvement


    in

    Quoted message said:

    7.6% in patients with peripheral vascular disease. In cerebral vascular


    disease

    Quoted message said:

    24% showed marked improvement and 30% good improvement. Overall this study
    showed that 75% of all groups had marked improvement. 9

    Proves nothing

    LOL. yep only a 91% marked improvement.

    No, it proves nothing, because it was retrospective, unrandomized, and
    uncontrolled, and there are at least three randomized, double-blind,
    controlled studies showing no benefit. Such studies nearly always trump
    retrospective, uncontrolled, and unrandomized studies.

    Quoted message said:

    First you shout for studies, then they mean nothing.

    No, he points out that the study you chose means little.

    Quoted message said:

    So, people will keep right on doing what works.

    Which, of course, doesn't work, as has been shown by the randomized,
    double-blinded, controlled studies to date. While these studies were not
    sufficiently powered to rule out small effects, they quite conclusively
    rule out the large effects claimed by you and other alties, such as "90%
    improvement."

    Quoted message said:

    Inspite of witch hunts and dirty tactics of *organized medicine*

    Yes, I suppose that to you insisting on sound evidence is a "dirty
    trick."

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.