Those scientists supplied a basic physiological mechanism. The Aspirin Foundation was playing it up
to sell more aspirin, presumably, when in fact, all one needs to do is avoid free radical damaged
food, or food that is very susceptible to free radical degradation in vivo, and eat plenty of foods
high in antioxidants that don't have a "down side," such as most fruit. If you think they are wrong
in their understanding of thymus function, and how that relates to immune function, and how that
relates to the genesis and spread of certain cancers, then go ahead and explain what your position
is on this subject (and why they are wrong). Seems like a compelling argument to me, though I don't
advocate aspirin, on the same grounds that you noted.
Alf posted:
On Fri said:That's what these scientists are saying, though they don't seem to understand that smoking is an
"irritant" due to the free radical damage, so I also included a study after the first that
discusses this. Omega 6 PUFA are very pro-inflammatory, but oxidative stress is also very
unhealthy, and omega 3 PUFAs are about 5 times more susceptible to free radical
degradation
Quoted message said:than omega 6s, so it's best to stay away from PUFAs as much as possible. Also, damaged protein and
oxidized cholesterol should be avoided as well (along with the obvious things to avoid - smoking,
asbestos, etc.).
You can't conclude that from a study on a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. Aspirin is not that good
antioxidant. Then salicylate should be a far better thing to use since that one is a far better
antioxidant and do not inactivate chemically the cyclooxygenase molecule, that is, kill the enzyme
molecule by chemically modifying the active site of the enzyme."