B. Lafferty said:
Your interpretation of the statistic is flawed. Frequency of posting
does
Quoted message said:not correlate to neutrality or lack of it. It may correlate to
interest in
Quoted message said:the person under discussion, but that, too says nothing as to
neutrality or
Quoted message said:bias. You would have to do an analysis of the substance of the
posts.
Dumbass -
In the thread "Pissing on Armstrong's Parade", you cite the article
which quotes Dr. Steffen as stating that Marty Jemison and Tyler
Hamilton approached him about acquiring "mineral water".
At the time of that incident, Lance Armstrong was not even racing. Yet,
instead of titling the thread "Hamilton is a Doper", you titled it
"Pissing on Armstrong's Parade".
Like I said. Bias.
BTW, there's nothing the matter with being biased. However, there is
something the matter with being dishonest or delusional about it. Just
my opinion.
Take care and have a nice day.
K. Gringioni