General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: biggest loser - strange stuff

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 2 posts · 284 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
29 October 2004
Last activity
1 November 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
284
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Many have, he is so invested in his anti science view,nutritional theology
    really, that he is blind to facts. His simple minded interpretation of
    what very little information he presents says something about his grasp on
    using logic and of understanding the basics of science. For months he was
    demanding we demonstrate that a negative cal. balance can lead to weight
    loss. When provided with specific examples he ignored them and continued
    his retorical tap dancing. If I recall correctly, it was at that time when
    presented with evidence he started his "all research is bunk because the
    commercial intrests manipulate it" rant to show why such evidence not
    supporting his view should be ignored. He never gave up his notion and
    has dusted it off with you in this thread. He demands "proof", ignores
    when it is given, and then declares none exists while providing no info to
    support his views.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That is not uncommon. The first several days of a weight loss program
    frequently results in water loss which does not necessarily continue later on.

    Quoted message said:


    Ora

    Have you told him this before, Ora? I could have sworn I've seen
    several do that in the archives. He's been a perisitent pusher of his
    low carb mantra, hasn't he!

  2. On 29 Oct 2004 14:15:32 GMT, [email hidden] posted:

    Thanks for the clarification, Mark

    Quoted message said:

    Many have, he is so invested in his anti science view,nutritional theology
    really, that he is blind to facts. His simple minded interpretation of
    what very little information he presents says something about his grasp on
    using logic and of understanding the basics of science. For months he was
    demanding we demonstrate that a negative cal. balance can lead to weight
    loss. When provided with specific examples he ignored them and continued
    his retorical tap dancing. If I recall correctly, it was at that time when
    presented with evidence he started his "all research is bunk because the
    commercial intrests manipulate it" rant to show why such evidence not
    supporting his view should be ignored. He never gave up his notion and
    has dusted it off with you in this thread. He demands "proof", ignores
    when it is given, and then declares none exists while providing no info to
    support his views.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That is not uncommon. The first several days of a weight loss program
    frequently results in water loss which does not necessarily continue later on.

    Quoted message said:


    Ora

    Have you told him this before, Ora? I could have sworn I've seen
    several do that in the archives. He's been a perisitent pusher of his
    low carb mantra, hasn't he!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.