General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: bathroom scale hysteresis

Started by Andre · · Last activity · 3 posts · 287 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 May 2005
Last activity
30 May 2005
Original author
Andre
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
287
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Our bathroom scale has exactly the same problem - the same reading is
    repeated when you weigh yourself a number of times.

    If the first reading were, say 160.3, further readings would be either
    160.3 exactly, or something outside the range of 160.3 plus/minus 1.

    These results, I believe, is a result of clever firmware and not
    mechanical or sensor characteristics.

  2. "Andre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Our bathroom scale has exactly the same problem - the same reading is
    repeated when you weigh yourself a number of times.

    If the first reading were, say 160.3, further readings would be either
    160.3 exactly, or something outside the range of 160.3 plus/minus 1.

    These results, I believe, is a result of clever firmware and not
    mechanical or sensor characteristics.

    About ten lines of code in C or C++; not at all hard to add.

    -JS2

  3. "JS2" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Andre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Our bathroom scale has exactly the same problem - the same reading is
    repeated when you weigh yourself a number of times.

    If the first reading were, say 160.3, further readings would be either
    160.3 exactly, or something outside the range of 160.3 plus/minus 1.

    These results, I believe, is a result of clever firmware and not
    mechanical or sensor characteristics.

    About ten lines of code in C or C++; not at all hard to add.

    -JS2

    I have a hard time believing that they would do that. Why would they go to
    the trouble of "lying" to users of their product?

    If I noticed my scale doing that, I would not be happy. Fortunately, my
    4-year old Tanita does not seem affected by this problem (I've tested it a
    number of different ways, and never once noticed the problem described by
    the OP).

    Perhaps it's limited only to low-end scales.

    Oddly enough, nobody complaining about this "problem" has mentioned brand
    names either...

    --
    GG
    http://www.WeightWare.com
    Computer-Assisted Weight Management

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.