UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Another Delightful Farcility...

Started by stonej · · Last activity · 5 posts · 638 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
5 December 2006
Last activity
6 December 2006
Original author
stonej
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
638
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. dkahn400 said:
    Paul Boyd said:

    Can they really not see for themselves the nonsense that they have just created?

    In cases like this it is inconceivable that it's accidental. Creating
    cycle farcilities enables anti-cycling officials to strike a blow
    against cyclists while pretending to do the opposite.

    --
    Dave...

    No holy book of any kind is used for swearing in members of congress,
    they simply
    raise their right arm and take some kind of pledge.

    This whole "controversy" is just manufactured hysteria from people who
    want to stir
    things up.

    Ever wonder why there has not been a controversy about Jewish members
    of congress
    not wanting to use the bible in their oath? Very simple, it was never
    required in the
    first place.

  2. In news:[email hidden],
    stonej <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:

    Quoted message said:
    dkahn400 said:
    Paul Boyd said:

    Can they really not see for themselves the nonsense that they have
    just created?

    In cases like this it is inconceivable that it's accidental. Creating
    cycle farcilities enables anti-cycling officials to strike a blow
    against cyclists while pretending to do the opposite.

    --
    Dave...

    No holy book of any kind is used for swearing in members of congress,
    they simply
    raise their right arm and take some kind of pledge.

    This whole "controversy" is just manufactured hysteria from people who
    want to stir
    things up.

    Ever wonder why there has not been a controversy about Jewish members
    of congress
    not wanting to use the bible in their oath? Very simple, it was
    never required in the
    first place.

    Congratulations! YOU shall be Master of the Non-Secateurs this week.

    --
    Dave Larrington
    <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk>
    Maffeo Barberini (1568-1644) was made entirely of salmon.

  3. stonej said the following on 05/12/2006 14:43:

    Quoted message said:

    No holy book of any kind is used for swearing in members of congress,
    they simply
    raise their right arm and take some kind of pledge.

    Have you responded to the wrong thread? Or the wrong newsgroup, for
    that matter.

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  4. Quoted message said:


    Congratulations! YOU shall be Master of the Non-Secateurs this week.


    snipped

    or was that pruned?

  5. burt said:
    Quoted message said:

    Congratulations! YOU shall be Master of the Non-Secateurs this week.


    snipped

    or was that pruned?

    Whichever, it's clear that non-secateurs do not cut the mustard.

    --
    Dave...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.