Quoted message said:Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
From: "rb" [email hidden]
Date: 7/17/2003 12:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]
Quoted message said:My dear it wouldn't come to that. I 'd have chelation or EECP long before
that!--rb
doofus...rubber brains..
perhaps if you had a brain or two..you would know that 50% of those suffering
heart attacks have NO NO symptoms etc prior to that "nuclear power ball" pain
in the chest (hubby's apt description)...so how then would YOU know to get
chelation or EECP?? divine powers of "what could happen?""
Again..go back and read the dribble on EECP (which obviously you
haven't)....ONLY those folks who have HAD intervention (and failed)..or those
too desperately ill or old to SURVIVE intervention are even considered for EECP
(nor will Medicare or private insurance PAY)....it is NOT a first line
therapy..it is last ditch..symptomatic only treatment
so again..answer my original premise...YOU are in the ER having said heart
attack..STILL think you would demand chelation??(knowing of course that NO
cardiologist would recommend EECP at such a dire time....)
you continue to amaze me with your ignorance of WHAT constitutes "first line"
measures...what is considered "accepted" preventative measures..etc etc....
yep..just jump on the chelation table and fire away...forget EECP as
prevention..it isn't used for prevention..not that you know there is EVEN a
difference..
maroon...
hawki