Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: 9 speed vs. 8 speed chains.

Started by A Muzi · · Last activity · 2 posts · 293 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
26 November 2004
Last activity
29 November 2004
Original author
A Muzi
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
293
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Retro Bob said:

    What's the difference ?
    What runs better on old "was a 5/10 speed" and now is a "7/14 speed"
    freewheel/chainwheel setup ?

    Generally, use the fattest chain you can. Seven speeds like
    7.3mm chain best. 7.1mm 8-speed is a second choice.

    Skinny, modern 9speed chain costs more, wears faster (as
    noted in the post just before yours from the mysterious Mr
    RP10128.)

    Wear is noticed at the rear but any problems shifting a
    too-skinny chain are more likely in the front. Older front
    changers shift a chain with rivets sticking out the side
    better than our new smooth ones. A too-skinny chain can
    fall between the chainrings and wedge them apart.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  2. A Muzi said:


    Retro Bob said:

    What's the difference ?
    What runs better on old "was a 5/10 speed" and now is a "7/14 speed"
    freewheel/chainwheel setup ?

    Generally, use the fattest chain you can. Seven speeds like
    7.3mm chain best. 7.1mm 8-speed is a second choice.

    Skinny, modern 9speed chain costs more, wears faster (as
    noted in the post just before yours from the mysterious Mr
    RP10128.)

    I thought the claim was about a cassette, not a chain.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.