Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

RCN on ARBR

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 1 post · 410 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
8 November 2004
Last activity
8 November 2004
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
410
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Here is the word from RCN on ARBR as found on page 25 of the latest issue,
    Nov/Dec 2004:

    "This was once the most popular recumbent newsgroup, but it turned into a
    soap box for personal opinion and politics for a select few. On any given
    topic, about 10% of the posts contain good information."

    Mr. Robert Bryant, the publisher and editor of RCN (Recumbent Cyclist News),
    has only got it partially right. A thread that is off topic will normally
    not even have 10% good information, at least not on the subject of
    recumbents. On the other hand, a thread that is on topic will have about the
    usual amount of good information that is to be found on any newsgroup or web
    site. Fully 95% of the threads will be on topic almost all of the time. Mr.
    Bryant is confusing the number of posts on a newsgroup with the number of
    subject threads on a newsgroup. They are not the same thing. If some of us
    like to post more to off topic than to on topic, how does that effect the on
    topic threads? Not at all I would claim. When I go to a newsgroup, I do not
    look at the number of posts, I look for the threads that I might be
    interested in and then and only then do I look at the posts.

    Even Mr. Bryant gets off topic every now and then in his magazine. But even
    so, it is the best publication around on the subject of recumbents and
    anyone here who is not subscribing to it is seriously remiss. What you find
    on the Internet on all those web sites having to do with recumbents is a
    mish-mash of information, much of it wrong and much of it stupid. What you
    find in RCN is recumbent information which has been sifted through an
    intelligent mind and therefore has some sense to it.

    There is one last point to be made here as far as I am concerned. I have
    noted that many of those who formerly posted here would post some good
    recumbent information, but they also were including lots of political
    remarks along with it. I had to decide whether I wanted to put up with their
    political remarks for the sake of their recumbent information. I decided no.
    I have never regretted that decision. This newsgroup is no longer lop sided
    with liberal political comments like it was in the bad old days when it "
    .... was once the most popular recumbent newsgroup."

    --
    Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.