In todays Pittsburgh newspaper there was an article about how almost six miles of a rails-to-trails was converted to a landfill. Reading the story shocked me because our local politicans keep telling us how important such trails are to the community, but when a "developer" wants the land then they whistle another tune. Has anything like this happened to other trails? See link below for story.
"mary" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
I am not saying that this is a good or bad thing, but I think you mis-read some things:
Quoted message said:
In todays Pittsburgh newspaper there was an article about how almost six miles of a rails-to-trails was
"might be" not "was"
Quoted message said:
converted to a landfill.
Not quite. The trail will be converted back to rail for hauling trash.
Quoted message said:
Reading the story shocked me because our local politicans keep telling us how important such trails are to the community, but when a "developer" wants the land then they whistle another tune. Has anything like this happened to other trails? See link below for story.
Reading the story shocked me because our local politicans keep telling us how important such trails are to the community, but when a "developer" wants the land then they whistle another tune. Has anything like this happened to other trails? See link below for story.
I have truly enjoyed the sensationalism. They have a right to restore the railroad. This is the deal. I always enjoy people that renege on their agreements. Such an attitude fosters outright abandonment and let the weeds take it. Railroads might give more trackage if they could back when they want it.
For a widely known trail that was taken back, look at the Boston Post Road.