Raghead Mail



D

David

Guest
I don't normally read other people's mail - but I can't believe these guys
are serious. Who would read this **** never mind write it? And if it is all
genuine, who intercepted it why couldn't they follow the camel back to nail
the clown who wrote it?
(the letter that the 2nd in command of Al queda wrote to the 3rd or vice
versa)
http://www.dni.gov/letter_in_english.pdf
 
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:13:58 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>who intercepted it why couldn't they follow the camel back to nail
>the clown who wrote it?

Because they are idiots just like Bushit, and any idiot who voted for
him, or supports him.
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:13:58 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >who intercepted it why couldn't they follow the camel back to nail
> >the clown who wrote it?
>
> Because they are idiots just like Bushit, and any idiot who voted for
> him, or supports him.
>


And incredibly verbose, boring, but curiously well educated.
--

"Cocaine's a hell of a drug" - Rick James
 
"David" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I don't normally read other people's mail - but I can't believe these guys
>are serious. Who would read this **** never mind write it? And if it is all
>genuine, who intercepted it why couldn't they follow the camel back to nail
>the clown who wrote it?
>(the letter that the 2nd in command of Al queda wrote to the 3rd or vice
>versa)
>http://www.dni.gov/letter_in_english.pdf

If you get past the religious rhetoric, it makes perfect sense.
Zawahiri is intelligent, well educated, and has a lot of political
savvy. Zarqawi is, quite simply, a psychopath. And even if the
psychopath is doing God's work, it's a good idea to reign him in and
suggest some structure before he alienates the whole mainstream Muslim
world. Of course, its best to assume a humble posture when making
those suggestions, because you don't want to ******** the psychopath,
right?
 
TheBillRodgers <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:13:58 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>who intercepted it why couldn't they follow the camel back to nail
>>the clown who wrote it?
>
>Because they are idiots just like Bushit, and any idiot who voted for
>him, or supports him.

If you're going to do a Mr. Hankey impression, you need to use long
strings of consecutive adjectives and add a few <chuckle> tags.

HTH
 
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:56:14 -0400, JMW <[email protected]> wrote:

>If you're going to do a Mr. Hankey impression, you need to use long
>strings of consecutive adjectives and add a few <chuckle> tags.

Oh sorry, I'll work on that. In the meantime I'll just say I agree
with Mr Hankey in theory, but the way he says it only bolsters the
Bushites. He's Bushits best friend/worse enemy.
 
"JMW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "David" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I don't normally read other people's mail - but I can't believe these guys
>>are serious. Who would read this **** never mind write it? And if it is
>>all
>>genuine, who intercepted it why couldn't they follow the camel back to
>>nail
>>the clown who wrote it?
>>(the letter that the 2nd in command of Al queda wrote to the 3rd or vice
>>versa)
>>http://www.dni.gov/letter_in_english.pdf
>
> If you get past the religious rhetoric, it makes perfect sense.

that's the hard part
> Zawahiri is intelligent, well educated, and has a lot of political
> savvy.

yes I heard a review of the letter and seems he is 'human' at least

>Zarqawi is, quite simply, a psychopath. And even if the
> psychopath is doing God's work, it's a good idea to reign him in and
> suggest some structure before he alienates the whole mainstream Muslim
> world.

That makes sense.

>Of course, its best to assume a humble posture when making
> those suggestions, because you don't want to ******** the psychopath,
> right?

Actually, I would go to pains not to alienate either of these gentlemen.
 
"TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:13:58 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>who intercepted it why couldn't they follow the camel back to nail
>>the clown who wrote it?
>
> Because they are idiots just like Bushit, and any idiot who voted for
> him, or supports him.

If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot. What
does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head in
shame.
 
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:50:52 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot. What
>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head in
>shame.

Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven YOU
are the idiot by posting something so stupid.
 
"TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:50:52 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot. What
>>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head in
>>shame.
>
> Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
> than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven YOU
> are the idiot by posting something so stupid.

Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and Kennedy -
beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!!
I can understand you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by AN
IDIOT!!! Ha ha ha ha ha!
 
"TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:50:52 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot. What
>>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head in
>>shame.
>
> Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
> than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven YOU
> are the idiot by posting something so stupid.

Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and
Kennedy - beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!! I can understand
you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by an IDIOT!!! Ha ha ha
ha ha!
 
"David" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:50:52 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot.
What
> >>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head in
> >>shame.
> >
> > Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
> > than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven YOU
> > are the idiot by posting something so stupid.
>
> Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and
> Kennedy - beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!! I can
understand
> you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by an IDIOT!!! Ha ha ha
> ha ha!
>

Ahh, David, Lincoln was a Republican (not that I would expect TBR to know
that). And TBR is correct, a great number of idiots voted in the election,
after all it was close.

--
------
Dr. Dickie
"Let be be finale of seem.
The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream."
-- Wallace Stevens
 
"Dr. Dickie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1129288600.e0c86fea0993f5b1dcd308862e75b5b6@teranews...
>
> "David" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:50:52 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot.
> What
>> >>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head
>> >>in
>> >>shame.
>> >
>> > Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
>> > than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven YOU
>> > are the idiot by posting something so stupid.
>>
>> Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and
>> Kennedy - beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!! I can
> understand
>> you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by an IDIOT!!! Ha ha
>> ha
>> ha ha!
>>
>
> Ahh, David, Lincoln was a Republican (not that I would expect TBR to know
> that). And TBR is correct, a great number of idiots voted in the election,
> after all it was close.
>
OMG a Republican! (well I had a 50-50 chance . . . and it was so long ago,
hard to remember these details!)
 
David wrote:
> "Dr. Dickie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > "David" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> "TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > "David" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot.
> >> >>What
> >> >>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head
> >> >>in shame.
> >> >
> >> > Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
> >> > than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven YOU
> >> > are the idiot by posting something so stupid.
> >>
> >> Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and
> >> Kennedy - beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!! I can
> >> understand
> >> you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by an IDIOT!!! Ha ha
> >> ha
> >> ha ha!
> >>
> >
> > Ahh, David, Lincoln was a Republican (not that I would expect TBR to know
> > that). And TBR is correct, a great number of idiots voted in the election,
> > after all it was close.
> >
> OMG a Republican! (well I had a 50-50 chance . . . and it was so long ago,
> hard to remember these details!)

Yes, David was just a wee lad during the Lincoln administration.
 
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:02:31 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and Kennedy -
>beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!!
>I can understand you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by AN
>IDIOT!!! Ha ha ha ha ha!

You must have the IQ of the average 4th grader, since you can't even
grasp the simple concept of voting. OR your mommy let you stay home
from school, and she's gone while you play with your computer (amongst
other things). Bye asswipe.
 
JMW wrote:
> David wrote:
>
>>"Dr. Dickie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>"David" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"David" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot.
>>>>>>What
>>>>>>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my head
>>>>>>in shame.
>>>>>
>>>>>Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
>>>>>than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven YOU
>>>>>are the idiot by posting something so stupid.
>>>>
>>>> Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and
>>>>Kennedy - beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!! I can
>>>>understand
>>>>you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by an IDIOT!!! Ha ha
>>>>ha
>>>>ha ha!
>>>>
>>>
>>>Ahh, David, Lincoln was a Republican (not that I would expect TBR to know
>>>that). And TBR is correct, a great number of idiots voted in the election,
>>>after all it was close.
>>>
>>
>>OMG a Republican! (well I had a 50-50 chance . . . and it was so long ago,
>>hard to remember these details!)
>
>
> Yes, David was just a wee lad during the Lincoln administration.
>

Remember that the philosophies behind the parties (and their
predecessors) changed radically over the last 150 years.

--
spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply

I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/
 
> OMG a Republican! (well I had a 50-50 chance . . . and it was so long ago,
> hard to remember these details!)

jeez you're an idiot. anyone with a high school education knows that Lincoln
was a Republican. it has nothing to do with memory.

>
>
 
"spodosaurus" <spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> JMW wrote:
> > David wrote:
> >
> >>"Dr. Dickie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>"David" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>"TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>"David" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>If you think about it, the party you support was beaten by an idiot.
> >>>>>>What
> >>>>>>does that say about the Democrats? If I were you I would bury my
head
> >>>>>>in shame.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Being beaten by an idiot, only means there are more voting idiots,
> >>>>>than there are non-idiots that voted. Of course you've just proven
YOU
> >>>>>are the idiot by posting something so stupid.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and
> >>>>Kennedy - beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!! I can
> >>>>understand
> >>>>you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by an IDIOT!!! Ha
ha
> >>>>ha
> >>>>ha ha!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Ahh, David, Lincoln was a Republican (not that I would expect TBR to
know
> >>>that). And TBR is correct, a great number of idiots voted in the
election,
> >>>after all it was close.
> >>>
> >>
> >>OMG a Republican! (well I had a 50-50 chance . . . and it was so long
ago,
> >>hard to remember these details!)
> >
> >
> > Yes, David was just a wee lad during the Lincoln administration.
> >
>
> Remember that the philosophies behind the parties (and their
> predecessors) changed radically over the last 150 years.
>


Yes, but you cannot mention that. You see, by today's standards, Kennedy
would be a conservative.

--
Dr. Dickie
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries,
is not 'Eureka!' ('I found it!'), but rather 'hmm....that's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
 
"THE VICAR" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> OMG a Republican! (well I had a 50-50 chance . . . and it was so long
>> ago, hard to remember these details!)
>
> jeez you're an idiot. anyone with a high school education knows that
> Lincoln was a Republican. it has nothing to do with memory.

"anyone with a high school education" .. . . . see that explains it . . I
went to college
 
"TheBillRodgers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:02:31 +1000, "David" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>Ha ha ha ha!! The great Democrat party - the party of Lincoln and
>>Kennedy -
>>beaten by an idiot - and twice!! Ha ha ha ha!!
>>I can understand you must be so embarassed about that . . . beaten by AN
>>IDIOT!!! Ha ha ha ha ha!
>
> You must have the IQ of the average 4th grader, since you can't even
> grasp the simple concept of voting. OR your mommy let you stay home
> from school, and she's gone while you play with your computer (amongst
> other things). Bye asswipe.

Yer a touch touchy for a troll ain't ya Bill?? (I guess if my party was
beaten by an idiot I would be off colour as well)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back