Can someone explain to me why the majority of professional cyclists still opt for 404 or 808 wheels when theyre not the absolute fastest option in every scenario, and is it simply a case of marketing and sponsorship influence or is there actually some aerodynamic or mechanical advantage that Im missing?
Ive been looking at the data and it seems that the latest generation of 65-80mm deep wheels from other manufacturers are actually outperforming the 404 and 808 in certain wind conditions and yaw angles, so Im wondering if the pros are just stuck in their ways or if theres something Im not considering.
Ive also noticed that a lot of amateur riders are still buying 404 and 808 wheels simply because they see the pros using them, but is this really the best option for them or are they just following the crowd?
Are the pros just trying to maintain a certain level of consistency and reliability, or is there actually something to be said for the 404 and 808s ability to handle crosswinds and rough roads?
Im not trying to stir up controversy, but I genuinely want to know if Im missing something or if the pros are just being stubborn.
Ive been looking at the data and it seems that the latest generation of 65-80mm deep wheels from other manufacturers are actually outperforming the 404 and 808 in certain wind conditions and yaw angles, so Im wondering if the pros are just stuck in their ways or if theres something Im not considering.
Ive also noticed that a lot of amateur riders are still buying 404 and 808 wheels simply because they see the pros using them, but is this really the best option for them or are they just following the crowd?
Are the pros just trying to maintain a certain level of consistency and reliability, or is there actually something to be said for the 404 and 808s ability to handle crosswinds and rough roads?
Im not trying to stir up controversy, but I genuinely want to know if Im missing something or if the pros are just being stubborn.