Rabid Anti recumbent posting



"Bill Wiley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:BD10DDCF.14E49%[email protected]...
> http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
>
> What a jerk


The original poster of that thread was nothing but a troll. It is
interesting to note however that the follow-up postings do not indicate any
hostility toward recumbents at all. In fact, I detect a slight interest.
Obviously the discomfort of an upright gets to just about everyone sooner or
later. Which goes to my point that the vast majority of us get into
recumbents for reasons of comfort, not speed.

I did get a kick out of the observation that most of us who ride recumbents
are over 40 years age. That is true from my observations too. But I would
remind the original poster of that thread that unless he is planning to die
at a relatively young age, he too is going to be over 40 one of these days -
and sooner than he thinks. Ah, to be 30 years old forever!

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Bill Wiley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:BD10DDCF.14E49%[email protected]...
> http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
>
> What a jerk
>


Interestingly he purports to have the occupation of an Attorney. Well enough
said about him then.

So, here is my theory on his attack on us.
I guess that as he is supposed to be an educated person he is supposed to be
very brainy, and like most of them types, he could probably write a thesis
on how to tie your shoe laces, but couldn't actually do it.
Come to think of it, maybe he tried to ride a recumbent and couldn't so now
he just tries to pay out on those of us who can :)

My other theory is that being an attorney, he might be trolling so that he
can sue somebody to get work - maybe a different slant on ambulance chasing
:)

Who cares what he says, (though its fun to have a reply) to quote somebody
from the group (apologies to whoever it was) that said "I likes what I
rides, and I rides what I likes".

regards to all those out there in Recumbent Land.
 
Since one of the photos on the message board is of me, taken from my
website, I sent the following to the site owner:

User "The Peoples Knees" posted message at url
http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2

Thread title "dorkmobiles".

This posting is a violation of your terms of service, particularly
"User Conduct" items Va, Vc, and Vf - posting a copyrighted photograph
from my web site and adding the title "Two idiots".

I am requesting that you take the following action:

1. Revoke the poster's account
2. Remove my copyrighted photograph from the message board.
3. Delete the thread from your message board.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.

Don't know if it helps, but trolls gotta learn somehow.
 
Well, I thought I'd see what got everyone's dander up, but it looks like
Steve was successful. The thread is gone!
"Steve Wood" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Since one of the photos on the message board is of me, taken from my
> website, I sent the following to the site owner:
>
> User "The Peoples Knees" posted message at url
> http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
>
> Thread title "dorkmobiles".
>
> This posting is a violation of your terms of service, particularly
> "User Conduct" items Va, Vc, and Vf - posting a copyrighted photograph
> from my web site and adding the title "Two idiots".
>
> I am requesting that you take the following action:
>
> 1. Revoke the poster's account
> 2. Remove my copyrighted photograph from the message board.
> 3. Delete the thread from your message board.
>
> Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.
>
> Don't know if it helps, but trolls gotta learn somehow.
 
Hi, Tom, by the time I got to check the link out, all I got was this message:-
"Thread has been removed or timed out... "

It certainly sounds like me on a bike I used to own.

Kind regards.

Lewis.

*******************************



Tom Sherman <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Bill Wiley wrote:
>
> > http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
> >
> > What a jerk

>
> I believe that one of the pictures is of Lewis "Limey Lew" Campbell
> (yellow LWB USS, black clothes, bare feet).
 
No big deal for me. I see those dorky SUVs blocking my vision, dorky
lowrider cars impessing everyone about who can ruin their alignment
first, dorky tourists with auditory problems thinking the whole area
is deaf, on and on.

And maybe I did have a dorkmobile at 28. Dorky helmet and all. Big
deal! That dorkmobile led to todays dorkmobile; for that I am glad.
I like marching to a different drummer anyway!

Chris Jordan
Santa Cruz, CA.



Terry <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 22:53:03 -0700, Bill Wiley wrote:
>
> > http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
> >
> > What a jerk

> Gotta give him credit..a flamer extraordinaire! I personally ride both
> recumbents and up"wrongs" finding they both have their uses and advantages.
 
Well done Steve!

"Steve Wood" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Since one of the photos on the message board is of me, taken from my
> website, I sent the following to the site owner:
>
> User "The Peoples Knees" posted message at url
> http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
>
> Thread title "dorkmobiles".
>
> This posting is a violation of your terms of service, particularly
> "User Conduct" items Va, Vc, and Vf - posting a copyrighted photograph
> from my web site and adding the title "Two idiots".
>
> I am requesting that you take the following action:
>
> 1. Revoke the poster's account
> 2. Remove my copyrighted photograph from the message board.
> 3. Delete the thread from your message board.
>
> Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.
>
> Don't know if it helps, but trolls gotta learn somehow.
 

>> Don't know if it helps, but trolls gotta learn somehow.

>
>
>


Get a response?
 
"Steve Wood" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Since one of the photos on the message board is of me, taken from my
> website, I sent the following to the site owner:
>
> User "The Peoples Knees" posted message at url
> http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
>
> Thread title "dorkmobiles".
>
> This posting is a violation of your terms of service, particularly
> "User Conduct" items Va, Vc, and Vf - posting a copyrighted photograph
> from my web site and adding the title "Two idiots".
>
> I am requesting that you take the following action:
>
> 1. Revoke the poster's account
> 2. Remove my copyrighted photograph from the message board.
> 3. Delete the thread from your message board.
>
> Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.
>
> Don't know if it helps, but trolls gotta learn somehow.


Steve, I think you are right on about someone stealing your copyrighted
photo and using it for his own purposes. However I want any and all assholes
to be able to post whatever messages they want no matter how outrageous.
That is one of the very best things about the Internet and newsgroups. The
original poster has every right to say whatever he wants to about recumbent
cyclists. Even though I disagree with him most strongly, I will defend his
right to say what he wants to say to the death. He should not have taken
your photo, but other than that he was perfectly within his rights.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Christopher Jordan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> No big deal for me. I see those dorky SUVs blocking my vision, dorky
> lowrider cars impessing everyone about who can ruin their alignment
> first, dorky tourists with auditory problems thinking the whole area
> is deaf, on and on.
>
> And maybe I did have a dorkmobile at 28. Dorky helmet and all. Big
> deal! That dorkmobile led to todays dorkmobile; for that I am glad.
> I like marching to a different drummer anyway!


Right you are Chris! Whenever I get to thinking I am a dork, I look around
me and see nothing but other dorks. The funniest people in the world are
those who think they are cool. I just about die laughing at them. Like you,
I have always marched to the beat of a different drummer, but most others
are too - only they don't realize it like you and I do.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
Damn, I wont get to know what a dorkmobile looks like now. Could
someone tell a UK guy what a dork is?
phil


"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> "Steve Wood" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Since one of the photos on the message board is of me, taken from my
> > website, I sent the following to the site owner:
> >
> > User "The Peoples Knees" posted message at url
> > http://www.mma.tv/TUF/index.cfm?ac=ListMessages&TID=451514&FID=2
> >
> > Thread title "dorkmobiles".
> >
> > This posting is a violation of your terms of service, particularly
> > "User Conduct" items Va, Vc, and Vf - posting a copyrighted photograph
> > from my web site and adding the title "Two idiots".
> >
> > I am requesting that you take the following action:
> >
> > 1. Revoke the poster's account
> > 2. Remove my copyrighted photograph from the message board.
> > 3. Delete the thread from your message board.
> >
> > Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.
> >
> > Don't know if it helps, but trolls gotta learn somehow.

>
> Steve, I think you are right on about someone stealing your copyrighted
> photo and using it for his own purposes. However I want any and all assholes
> to be able to post whatever messages they want no matter how outrageous.
> That is one of the very best things about the Internet and newsgroups. The
> original poster has every right to say whatever he wants to about recumbent
> cyclists. Even though I disagree with him most strongly, I will defend his
> right to say what he wants to say to the death. He should not have taken
> your photo, but other than that he was perfectly within his rights.
 
Phil Gough wrote:
> Damn, I wont get to know what a dorkmobile looks like now. Could
> someone tell a UK guy what a dork is?


I am reliably informed that "dork" is a slang term for the male reproductive
organ. Or at least it /was/ when I were a lad.

--

Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/
===========================================================
Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
http://www.bhpc.org.uk/
===========================================================
 
"Dave Larrington" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Phil Gough wrote:
> > Damn, I wont get to know what a dorkmobile looks like now. Could
> > someone tell a UK guy what a dork is?

>
> I am reliably informed that "dork" is a slang term for the male

reproductive
> organ. Or at least it /was/ when I were a lad.


True. But that was years ago. Nowadays in the USA the general usage is to
describe a person who looks foolish, clumsy, and has awkward social skills.

skip
 
"skip" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Dave Larrington" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Phil Gough wrote:
> > > Damn, I wont get to know what a dorkmobile looks like now. Could
> > > someone tell a UK guy what a dork is?

> >
> > I am reliably informed that "dork" is a slang term for the male

> reproductive
> > organ. Or at least it /was/ when I were a lad.

>
> True. But that was years ago. Nowadays in the USA the general usage is to
> describe a person who looks foolish, clumsy, and has awkward social

skills.
>
> skip
>
>


A bit like the guy whose ratings about recumbent riders who started this :)
 
"skip" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Dave Larrington" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Phil Gough wrote:
> > > Damn, I wont get to know what a dorkmobile looks like now. Could
> > > someone tell a UK guy what a dork is?

> >
> > I am reliably informed that "dork" is a slang term for the male

> reproductive
> > organ. Or at least it /was/ when I were a lad.

>
> True. But that was years ago. Nowadays in the USA the general usage is to
> describe a person who looks foolish, clumsy, and has awkward social

skills.
>
> skip


Right you are skip - as usual. However, you should have pointed out that you
and I are examples of supreme undorkiness and that most of the other
denizens of ARBR are examples of supreme dorkiness. I give you Mr. Tom
Sherman as the premier exemplar of the species DORK. He thinks that "Mr. Ed"
is the height of humor. I don't think it gets any dorkier than that!

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota