General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

questions about hard-gainer-ness ...

Started by Monique Y. Mudama · · Last activity · 4 posts · 373 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 April 2005
Last activity
18 April 2005
Original author
Monique Y. Mudama
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
373
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is there such a thing as being a "hardgainer" in non-lifting sports,
    like cycling and ice hockey? If so, is a hardgainer wrt weights also
    a hardgainer wrt these other activities? (Not sure how to identify
    them, as they're not necessarily aerobic; in hockey, for example,
    you're pushing yourself as hard as possible for a minute or so at a
    time.) And finally, if you're a hardgainer, do lifting and these
    other sports take up the same slots in your workout routine? That is,
    if you're only supposed to be doing N workouts a week, does that mean
    you can only do N total for both lifting and the other stuff, or can
    you lift N times and also do some other activities?

    Last year, I was playing ice hockey and mountain biking to a total of 5
    or 6 activities a week, maybe more; for a while I was hitting my goal of
    biking every single day ... felt great at the beginning of the summer,
    but had what seem to me the classic symptoms of overtraining by the end.
    Couldn't sleep, frequent, prolonged colds, injuries, loss of strength
    and endurance ...

    Anyoo. When I tell my husband that I believe I was overtraining last
    year, well, he just poo-poos it. See, when he was in high school, he
    was a swimmer and trained roughly four bazillion hours a day, so he
    figures if it worked for him and the rest of the swim team, I must be
    wrong. I'll admit that I did what, in retrospect, seems to have been
    a very dumb thing -- I was trying a low-fat diet at the same time as I
    was cranking up the exercise. I read a book on nutrition, and it said
    a lot more than just "don't eat too much fat," but I latched on to
    that one piece of advice ... so in the end, I think I was starving
    myself for fat. And I'm sure that didn't help. But I still think
    that, for my body, I was probably overtraining ...

    Thoughts?

    --
    monique

  2. "Monique Y. Mudama" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Is there such a thing as being a "hardgainer" in non-lifting sports,
    like cycling and ice hockey? If so, is a hardgainer wrt weights also
    a hardgainer wrt these other activities? (Not sure how to identify
    them, as they're not necessarily aerobic; in hockey, for example,
    you're pushing yourself as hard as possible for a minute or so at a
    time.) And finally, if you're a hardgainer, do lifting and these
    other sports take up the same slots in your workout routine? That is,
    if you're only supposed to be doing N workouts a week, does that mean
    you can only do N total for both lifting and the other stuff, or can
    you lift N times and also do some other activities?

    Last year, I was playing ice hockey and mountain biking to a total of
    5
    or 6 activities a week, maybe more; for a while I was hitting my goal
    of
    biking every single day ... felt great at the beginning of the summer,
    but had what seem to me the classic symptoms of overtraining by the
    end.
    Couldn't sleep, frequent, prolonged colds, injuries, loss of strength
    and endurance ...

    Anyoo. When I tell my husband that I believe I was overtraining last
    year, well, he just poo-poos it. See, when he was in high school, he
    was a swimmer and trained roughly four bazillion hours a day, so he
    figures if it worked for him and the rest of the swim team, I must be
    wrong. I'll admit that I did what, in retrospect, seems to have been
    a very dumb thing -- I was trying a low-fat diet at the same time as I
    was cranking up the exercise. I read a book on nutrition, and it said
    a lot more than just "don't eat too much fat," but I latched on to
    that one piece of advice ... so in the end, I think I was starving
    myself for fat. And I'm sure that didn't help. But I still think
    that, for my body, I was probably overtraining ...

    Thoughts?

    The theory I've heard is that because swimming isn't weight bearing, you
    can do a lot more of it without overtraining. Biking's not a lot
    different - many hours per day, every day, is common. But you won't
    find runners training that way. Sounds to me like you've got it pretty
    well figured out.

    Steve "swimming teacher at the local YMCA" Freides
    http://www.kbnj.com

  3. "Steve Freides" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Monique Y. Mudama" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Is there such a thing as being a "hardgainer" in non-lifting sports,
    like cycling and ice hockey? If so, is a hardgainer wrt weights also
    a hardgainer wrt these other activities? (Not sure how to identify
    them, as they're not necessarily aerobic; in hockey, for example,
    you're pushing yourself as hard as possible for a minute or so at a
    time.) And finally, if you're a hardgainer, do lifting and these
    other sports take up the same slots in your workout routine? That is,
    if you're only supposed to be doing N workouts a week, does that mean
    you can only do N total for both lifting and the other stuff, or can
    you lift N times and also do some other activities?

    Last year, I was playing ice hockey and mountain biking to a total of 5
    or 6 activities a week, maybe more; for a while I was hitting my goal of
    biking every single day ... felt great at the beginning of the summer,
    but had what seem to me the classic symptoms of overtraining by the end.
    Couldn't sleep, frequent, prolonged colds, injuries, loss of strength
    and endurance ...

    Anyoo. When I tell my husband that I believe I was overtraining last
    year, well, he just poo-poos it. See, when he was in high school, he
    was a swimmer and trained roughly four bazillion hours a day, so he
    figures if it worked for him and the rest of the swim team, I must be
    wrong. I'll admit that I did what, in retrospect, seems to have been
    a very dumb thing -- I was trying a low-fat diet at the same time as I
    was cranking up the exercise. I read a book on nutrition, and it said
    a lot more than just "don't eat too much fat," but I latched on to
    that one piece of advice ... so in the end, I think I was starving
    myself for fat. And I'm sure that didn't help. But I still think
    that, for my body, I was probably overtraining ...

    Thoughts?

    The theory I've heard is that because swimming isn't weight bearing, you
    can do a lot more of it without overtraining. Biking's not a lot
    different - many hours per day, every day, is common. But you won't find
    runners training that way. Sounds to me like you've got it pretty well
    figured out.

    I wonder if it doesn't have more to do with the statement
    "when he was in high school". When I was in high school I
    wrestled, did judo, played competitive hockey, and lifted weights
    on the side. I can't remember ever feeling burnt out. Now I'm over
    forty, and I do the same activities ... except at about a quarter the
    intensity, and paying a lot more attention to training cycles. And
    I still burn out from time to time ... as you get older your body
    just doesn't recover as quickly. And its not just because most
    of us spend most of our time behind a desk; read up what
    professional athletes say about the long season once they
    get past their early 30's.

    -JS2

  4. "John Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Steve Freides" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Monique Y. Mudama" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Is there such a thing as being a "hardgainer" in non-lifting sports,
    like cycling and ice hockey? If so, is a hardgainer wrt weights
    also
    a hardgainer wrt these other activities? (Not sure how to identify
    them, as they're not necessarily aerobic; in hockey, for example,
    you're pushing yourself as hard as possible for a minute or so at a
    time.) And finally, if you're a hardgainer, do lifting and these
    other sports take up the same slots in your workout routine? That
    is,
    if you're only supposed to be doing N workouts a week, does that
    mean
    you can only do N total for both lifting and the other stuff, or can
    you lift N times and also do some other activities?

    Last year, I was playing ice hockey and mountain biking to a total
    of 5
    or 6 activities a week, maybe more; for a while I was hitting my
    goal of
    biking every single day ... felt great at the beginning of the
    summer,
    but had what seem to me the classic symptoms of overtraining by the
    end.
    Couldn't sleep, frequent, prolonged colds, injuries, loss of
    strength
    and endurance ...

    Anyoo. When I tell my husband that I believe I was overtraining
    last
    year, well, he just poo-poos it. See, when he was in high school,
    he
    was a swimmer and trained roughly four bazillion hours a day, so he
    figures if it worked for him and the rest of the swim team, I must
    be
    wrong. I'll admit that I did what, in retrospect, seems to have
    been
    a very dumb thing -- I was trying a low-fat diet at the same time as
    I
    was cranking up the exercise. I read a book on nutrition, and it
    said
    a lot more than just "don't eat too much fat," but I latched on to
    that one piece of advice ... so in the end, I think I was starving
    myself for fat. And I'm sure that didn't help. But I still think
    that, for my body, I was probably overtraining ...

    Thoughts?

    The theory I've heard is that because swimming isn't weight bearing,
    you can do a lot more of it without overtraining. Biking's not a lot
    different - many hours per day, every day, is common. But you won't
    find runners training that way. Sounds to me like you've got it
    pretty well figured out.

    I wonder if it doesn't have more to do with the statement
    "when he was in high school". When I was in high school I
    wrestled, did judo, played competitive hockey, and lifted weights
    on the side. I can't remember ever feeling burnt out. Now I'm over
    forty, and I do the same activities ... except at about a quarter the
    intensity, and paying a lot more attention to training cycles. And
    I still burn out from time to time ... as you get older your body
    just doesn't recover as quickly. And its not just because most
    of us spend most of our time behind a desk; read up what
    professional athletes say about the long season once they
    get past their early 30's.

    I'm sure you're right, and it all matters - the sport, one's age,
    nutrition, etc.

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.