Question for Tom "Fearless Fosdick" Sherman

Ozark Bicycle - 100% Service and 0% 'Attitude 1' - said:

Tom \'Johnny Sunset\' Sherman said:

RonSonic said:

Could it possibly be more obvious that I am not and never have used the "Google
Usenet interface."

That would require viewing of current and past headers.

Is your life that empty? Are you such a clueless wacko, such a lameass
loser that you spend your time "viewing current and past headers" of
posts to a Usenet group?

Sad..........

No Zarkie, just a statement of fact that it is generally not possible to
tell where a Usenet post comes from without looking at the header.

[1] That's saved for Usenet.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
“Twisting may help if yawl can chew gum and walk.” - gene daniels

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Tom 'Oldest male virgin on Usenet' Sherman said:

Ozark Bicycle - 100% Service and 0% 'Attitude 1' - said:

Tom \'Johnny Sunset\' Sherman said:

RonSonic wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Could it possibly be more obvious that I am not and never have used the "Google
> Usenet interface."
That would require viewing of current and past headers.

Quoted message said:

Is your life that empty? Are you such a clueless wacko, such a lameass
loser that you spend your time "viewing current and past headers" of
posts to a Usenet group?

Quoted message said:

Sad..........

No Zarkie, just a statement of fact that it is generally not possible to
tell where a Usenet post comes from without looking at the header.

Just think, Tommy, maybe one day you'll actually get laid; then, you
can worry about how long it will take you to get it up again, instead
of worrying about "where a Usenet post comes from".

Ozark Bicycle said:

Tom 'Oldest male virgin on Usenet' Sherman said:

Ozark Bicycle - 100% Service and 0% 'Attitude 1' - said:

On Aug 19, 8:20 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
> RonSonic wrote:
>> Could it possibly be more obvious that I am not and never have used the "Google
>> Usenet interface."
> That would require viewing of current and past headers.
Is your life that empty? Are you such a clueless wacko, such a lameass
loser that you spend your time "viewing current and past headers" of
posts to a Usenet group?
Sad..........

No Zarkie, just a statement of fact that it is generally not possible to
tell where a Usenet post comes from without looking at the header.

Just think, Tommy, maybe one day you'll actually get laid; then, you
can worry about how long it will take you to get it up again, instead
of worrying about "where a Usenet post comes from".

[Yawn]

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Ozark Bicycle said:

Just think, Tommy, maybe one day you'll actually get laid; then, you
can worry about how long it will take you to get it up again,

At his age, no doubt *very much faster* than you.

Quoted message said:

instead
of worrying about "where a Usenet post comes from".

That can be seen with one key-stroke on most newsreaders.