Power meters · Public discussion

question for the Ex. Phys. boffins

Started by rmur17 · · Last activity · 5 posts · 989 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
13 February 2007
Last activity
13 February 2007
Original author
rmur17
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
989
Views / 30 days
0
Topics
FTP

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I was looking at some historical CP-Monod testing of mine and a question came to mind re AWC at the longer durations.

    If one performs a 1-hr isopower test or TT right at current FTP and assuming that FTP is well established, is any AWC consumed or utilized?

  2. Wouldn't it *all* be utilized? Typical AWC values could contribute ~3-7w over a 60-min duration.

    That 3-7w represents the difference between critical power and FT power, no?

  3. frenchyge said:

    Wouldn't it *all* be utilized? Typical AWC values could contribute ~3-7w over a 60-min duration.

    That 3-7w represents the difference between critical power and FT power, no?


    well I'm also thinking of the advice that FTP is taken as CP from the CP-Monod test and not CP + AWC/3600.

    I have no axe to grind ... just wondering about what feels like a small discrepancy.

  4. rmur17 said:

    well I'm also thinking of the advice that FTP is taken as CP from the CP-Monod test and not CP + AWC/3600.

    I have no axe to grind ... just wondering about what feels like a small discrepancy.

    In theory, the maximum power you could generate for 60 min - IOW, your functional threshold power - should be equal to (critical power + anaerobic work capacity)/3600. However, such calculations typically entail extrapolating from the power that can be maintained for <3600 s, and the work-time relationship isn't really linear. Thus, in practice functional threshold power is usually closer to the slope of the work-time relationship itself, i.e., critical power. Or, to put it another way: ignoring the small contribution from anaerobic work capacity over a full hour automatically helps compensate for the tendency of the critical power approach to overestimate the power that can be maintained at longer durations.

  5. acoggan said:

    In theory, the maximum power you could generate for 60 min - IOW, your functional threshold power - should be equal to (critical power + anaerobic work capacity)/3600. However, such calculations typically entail extrapolating from the power that can be maintained for <3600 s, and the work-time relationship isn't really linear. Thus, in practice functional threshold power is usually closer to the slope of the work-time relationship itself, i.e., critical power. Or, to put it another way: ignoring the small contribution from anaerobic work capacity over a full hour automatically helps compensate for the tendency of the critical power approach to overestimate the power that can be maintained at longer durations.


    okay I understand. Recent training/testing results yield a CP of 376W and an AWC of 19000. Taking CP + AWC/3600 predicts 382W for the hour and I'm darned sure I can't hit that (at least indoors 🙂)

    Around what duration would you suggest to start derating the AWC component. Maybe downrate it linearly starting around 20-30 min duration (100%) to 0% contribution at 60min?

    thanks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.