UK and Europe · Public discussion

Question about E type front mechs

Started by Mark · · Last activity · 4 posts · 239 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
23 September 2006
Last activity
24 September 2006
Original author
Mark
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
239
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    My front mech has worn out and needs replacing. It's an E-type with
    the mounting around the bottom bracket. If I understand things
    correctly there is no height adjustment for these so they must be
    matched to the front chainrings. Most front mechs of this sort seem
    to expect a large chainring with 44 teeth whereas mine has only 42
    teeth.

    Is this close enough, or is this likely to be a problem?

    I know I could swap to a conventional mount, but I believe that would
    involve changing the BB. I don't want to spend too much at the moment
    ;-). I think I am limited to top-swing, since there is a bolt on the
    seat tube close to where I would expect to mount a bottom swing mech.

    TIA, Mark

  2. In article <[email hidden]>

    Mark said:

    Hi,

    My front mech has worn out and needs replacing. It's an E-type with
    the mounting around the bottom bracket. If I understand things
    correctly there is no height adjustment for these so they must be
    matched to the front chainrings. Most front mechs of this sort seem
    to expect a large chainring with 44 teeth whereas mine has only 42
    teeth.

    Is this close enough, or is this likely to be a problem?

    I know I could swap to a conventional mount, but I believe that would
    involve changing the BB. I don't want to spend too much at the moment
    ;-). I think I am limited to top-swing, since there is a bolt on the
    seat tube close to where I would expect to mount a bottom swing mech.


    Just reach down and shift the chain by hand - it's less hassle than
    trying to figure out what front mech to buy these days.

  3. Mark said:

    Hi,

    My front mech has worn out and needs replacing. It's an E-type with
    the mounting around the bottom bracket. If I understand things
    correctly there is no height adjustment for these so they must be
    matched to the front chainrings. Most front mechs of this sort seem
    to expect a large chainring with 44 teeth whereas mine has only 42
    teeth.

    Is this close enough, or is this likely to be a problem?

    I think you want the mech pretty close to the teeth of the big ring in a
    vertical sense, something between 1mm and 3mm, judging by the
    instructions that came with my new front mech.

    The difference in radius between a 44 tooth and 42 tooth chainring is
    probably about 3mm, so I think you'd be pushing it a bit, but might just
    get away with it.

    Quoted message said:

    I know I could swap to a conventional mount, but I believe that would
    involve changing the BB.

    I don't think you have to change the BB. I had a front mech like what I
    think you're describing: it was attached to a sort of little plate that
    protrudes from somewhere around the BB. I took the mech off (can't
    remember the details-- just undo the obvious bolts) and the plate is
    still there. The new chainrings I had were much bigger than the old
    ones, completely precluding attaching any kind of mech to the plate, so
    I just put on a normal front mech that clamps to the frame. Works fine.
    I will have a go at removing the plate if I get around to it, and may
    find it is impossible without changing the BB, but it doesn't get in the
    way of anything at the moment.

    I think you're right there's no height adjustment for these E-type
    mechs.

  4. Ben C said:
    Mark said:

    Hi,

    My front mech has worn out and needs replacing. It's an E-type with
    the mounting around the bottom bracket. If I understand things
    correctly there is no height adjustment for these so they must be
    matched to the front chainrings. Most front mechs of this sort seem
    to expect a large chainring with 44 teeth whereas mine has only 42
    teeth.

    Is this close enough, or is this likely to be a problem?

    I think you want the mech pretty close to the teeth of the big ring in a
    vertical sense, something between 1mm and 3mm, judging by the
    instructions that came with my new front mech.

    The difference in radius between a 44 tooth and 42 tooth chainring is
    probably about 3mm, so I think you'd be pushing it a bit, but might just
    get away with it.

    I don't want to risk it if the difference is that great. The last
    mech never changed very well and I want things to be better.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I know I could swap to a conventional mount, but I believe that would
    involve changing the BB.

    I don't think you have to change the BB. I had a front mech like what I
    think you're describing: it was attached to a sort of little plate that
    protrudes from somewhere around the BB. I took the mech off (can't
    remember the details-- just undo the obvious bolts) and the plate is
    still there. The new chainrings I had were much bigger than the old
    ones, completely precluding attaching any kind of mech to the plate, so
    I just put on a normal front mech that clamps to the frame. Works fine.
    I will have a go at removing the plate if I get around to it, and may
    find it is impossible without changing the BB, but it doesn't get in the
    way of anything at the moment.

    I think you're right there's no height adjustment for these E-type
    mechs.

    I'll guess I'll try a conventional mount and leave the bracket there
    if it does not foul on the new mech.

    Thanks for the reply.
    Mark

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.