UK and Europe · Public discussion

Product comparison - SealSkinz gloves

Started by Danny Colyer · · Last activity · 2 posts · 655 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
18 November 2005
Last activity
21 November 2005
Original author
Danny Colyer
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
655
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I recently decided to replace my ~6yo SealSkinz gloves, because they're
    no longer completely waterproof at the point where thumb and forefinger
    meet (which faces up when I'm riding my bike). When I went to do so, I
    noticed that breathable, cycling specific SealSkinz gloves are now
    available, so I decided to give them a go.

    The new gloves have several good and bad points in comparison to the
    old, all of which will correspond to the old saying about one man's meat.

    The most immediately obvious difference is in the styling of the gloves.
    The old style SealSkinz have plastic bobbles covering the palms and
    fingers, similar to the grips on the soles of big fluffy slippers. The
    new gloves /look/ like cycling gloves, with suede-effect padding on the
    heels and balls of the hands, and leather-look reinforcements on the
    tips of the thumb, forefinger and middle finger. They also have Terry
    cloth on the thumbs, which is usually considered a good thing in cycling
    gloves, but actually I found the surface material of the old SealSkinz
    perfectly adequate and probably better for wiping rain off of my cycling
    glasses.

    The cycling-specific gloves have Velcro cuffs, while the old style ones
    have elasticated cuffs. Velcro cuffs may at first seem like a good
    thing, but they add seconds to the time taken to get the gloves on and
    off. If, like me, you have a high-gravity mattress, anything that makes
    getting dressed take longer and isn't absolutely necessary is undesirable.

    One of the great things about the old style SealSkinz gloves is the
    unusual amount of dexterity (for warm gloves) that they allow. I didn't
    get the same amount of dexterity through the cycling-specific gloves.
    This was partly because they're stiffer (which could be just because
    they're new), but mostly because a lot of feel was lost through the
    thumb and fingertip reinforcements. For me, I really don't think the
    reinforcements are necessary. I once wore through the thumb and
    forefinger of a pair of unreinforced gloves in a matter of weeks simply
    by changing gear, but I've used the old style SealSkinz for years and
    the fingertips still look as good as new.

    I immediately encountered problems manipulating zips, drawstrings,
    doorkeys and computer buttons, though I dare say I'll get used to it.
    One thing that was much easier with the new gloves was flipping the lid
    on my Nalgene bottle.

    In their favour, the cycling specific gloves seem slightly warmer
    than the old style ones (although that could just be because they're
    new). The first morning that I planned to wear them, I woke up to a
    thick frost. I know that the old SealSkinz aren't warm enough if
    there's a frost, and usually I'd go rummaging for my Lobster Mitts.
    This time, though, I decided to take a chance and give the new SealSkinz
    a good test. They kept my hands toasty warm for about 5 miles, at which
    point the end of my left ring finger started to feel cold.

    (There were 3 frosty mornings this week, though, each colder than the
    last. On the second, my fingers started to feel cold after about 3
    miles. On the third they were cold after only a mile, and were starting
    to hurt by 3 miles. Next week I'll be wearing the Lobsters).

    Waterproofing is good, but not quite as good as the old style gloves
    were when new. I haven't yet used them in the rain, but after about 15
    seconds one finger failed the "dunking the gloved hand in a bucket of
    water" test.

    The breathability seems good. On days without a frost my hands have
    started to feel clammy once I get indoors at the end of a ride, but not
    as much as with the older gloves. I should mention that I always wear
    silk inner gloves when cycling with full-fingered gloves, partly for the
    extra warmth and partly because inner gloves are much easier to wash.

    Overall I think the old style gloves have the edge for recumbent
    commuting, but for an upright cyclist, or for longer rides, or for
    someone prone to sweaty hands, it may be worth paying the extra for the
    cycling specific gloves.

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  2. Danny Colyer said:

    I recently decided to replace my ~6yo SealSkinz gloves, because they're
    no longer completely waterproof at the point where thumb and forefinger
    meet (which faces up when I'm riding my bike). When I went to do so, I
    noticed that breathable, cycling specific SealSkinz gloves are now
    available, so I decided to give them a go.


    <snip>

    Thanks for the review Danny, reminds me I need a new pair since one of
    mine floated off into the Pacific a couple of years ago, and every time
    I've gone to get a new pair Tiso's have had any size I like aside from
    Large (and guess what size I need...).

    Sounds like I want to stick to the original flavour from what you say as
    I just use them as general purpose gloves.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.