Quoted message said:Subject: Re: Breggin revealed
From: jake nospamhere@all
Date: 9/27/2003 6:34 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Marko Proberto said:Quoted message said:
What's the point? Breggin is not a Scientologist, and he has his own
reasons for disliking the Scientologists.Hogwash. He is in lock step and financial step with them. Can you document
his reason why he would dislike $cientologists?sure...
My Real Opinion of Scientology
http://www.breggin.com/Joemccarthylives.html
I am not merely neutral about Scientology. I am critical of
Scientology. I became familiar with the group in 1972 when--for a
short time--I accepted its offer to work together on some reform
projects. As I got to know more about the group, I found myself
opposed to Scientology's values, agenda, and tactics. I stopped all
cooperative efforts in 1974 and publicly declared my criticism of the
group in a letter published in Reason as long ago as January 1975. For
two decades I have refused to have anything to do with Scientology and
have criticized it hundreds of time to the media, on the air, and in
public speeches and workshops.I have a yet more personal reason for refusing to have anything to do
with Scientology. In 1973 I met and fell in love with an idealistic
twenty-year-old Ginger Ross; but Scientology officials pressured her
to stop seeing me because I was not a member of their group. Ginger
and I did not meet again for twelve years. By then she had broken all
ties with Scientology and had become a staunch critic of it. We have
now been married for ten years and are the co-authors of Talking Back
to Prozac and The War Against Children.That Lilly would try to link my views with those of Scientology, when
Ginger and I are known, long-standing critics of that group, indicates
the giant corporation's desperation to prevent the American public
from learning the truth about Prozac and the company's corporate
practices in researching and promoting it. Eli Lilly's McCarthy-like
tactic of trying to link me with Scientology--when I am in fact
opposed to that organization--reflects the extreme lengths to which
the company will go to protect its profits at the expense of patients
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Probert Revealed
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 28 September 2003
- Last activity
- 28 September 2003
- Original author
- Jan
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 298
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
In said:
Quoted message said:
Subject: Re: Breggin revealed
From: jake nospamhere@all
Date: 9/27/2003 6:34 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Marko Proberto said:
>
> What's the point? Breggin is not a Scientologist, and he has his own
> reasons for disliking the Scientologists.Hogwash. He is in lock step and financial step with them. Can you document
his reason why he would dislike $cientologists?sure...
My Real Opinion of Scientology
His distaste for the CO$ no doubt explains why he joined them
in last years' exercise in barratry.--
| "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a |
| completely unintentional side effect. " -- Linus Torvalds |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <[email hidden]> ----------+ -
Funny, he takes money and ideas from them.
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Subject: Re: Breggin revealed
From: jake nospamhere@all
Date: 9/27/2003 6:34 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Marko Proberto said:
>
> What's the point? Breggin is not a Scientologist, and he has his own
> reasons for disliking the Scientologists.Hogwash. He is in lock step and financial step with them. Can you
documentQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
his reason why he would dislike $cientologists?
sure...
My Real Opinion of Scientology
http://www.breggin.com/Joemccarthylives.html
I am not merely neutral about Scientology. I am critical of
Scientology. I became familiar with the group in 1972 when--for a
short time--I accepted its offer to work together on some reform
projects. As I got to know more about the group, I found myself
opposed to Scientology's values, agenda, and tactics. I stopped all
cooperative efforts in 1974 and publicly declared my criticism of the
group in a letter published in Reason as long ago as January 1975. For
two decades I have refused to have anything to do with Scientology and
have criticized it hundreds of time to the media, on the air, and in
public speeches and workshops.I have a yet more personal reason for refusing to have anything to do
with Scientology. In 1973 I met and fell in love with an idealistic
twenty-year-old Ginger Ross; but Scientology officials pressured her
to stop seeing me because I was not a member of their group. Ginger
and I did not meet again for twelve years. By then she had broken all
ties with Scientology and had become a staunch critic of it. We have
now been married for ten years and are the co-authors of Talking Back
to Prozac and The War Against Children.That Lilly would try to link my views with those of Scientology, when
Ginger and I are known, long-standing critics of that group, indicates
the giant corporation's desperation to prevent the American public
from learning the truth about Prozac and the company's corporate
practices in researching and promoting it. Eli Lilly's McCarthy-like
tactic of trying to link me with Scientology--when I am in fact
opposed to that organization--reflects the extreme lengths to which
the company will go to protect its profits at the expense of patients
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.