[font=Arial]Pro cycling is in a real danger of fragmenting. The following issues need resolving:[/font]
[font=Arial] [/font]
- [font=Arial]The Pro Tour calendar, structure, number of teams and legality of the ‘Code of Ethics’[/font]
- [font=Arial]The ASO, Unipublic and RCS breaking away from the Pro Tour and their stand on issuing ‘wild card’ entries to their events. [/font]
- [font=Arial]The National Federations of Spain, Austria, Belgium, Italy, France and Luxembourg rejecting the current structure of the Pro Tour and requesting round table talks to be held by all involved in cycling. [/font]
- [font=Arial]The AIOCC (Internal Association of Cycle racing Organisers) mounting an anti trust challenge to the European Commission on the closed system of competition in the Pro Tour.[/font]
- [font=Arial]Different drug policies in most countries.[/font]
- [font=Arial]The fallout from Operation Puerto.[/font]
[font=Arial] [/font]
[font=Arial]The UCI needs to draw a line under this current presidency. Under this leadership the UCI appears to be alienating all parts of cycling and ‘fire fighting’ on all the above issues. The UCI continues to drive national federations, race organisers and fans away from the Pro Tour vision. [/font]
[font=Arial] [/font]
[font=Arial]The way out for the UCI is to stand down the current president and initially appoint someone in the short term who can unite cycling and also start the process of electing a new president. If the UCI don’t act they will lose control of pro racing in Europe. With or without the UCI, pro racing in Europe will continue, and the fans, sponsors and teams will follow the riders who want to race in grand tours and classic one day races. I wonder what they will do. Probably nothing and pro racing in Europe will change without them. Does it matter?[/font]
[font=Arial] [/font]