General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Priorities???

Started by OmManiPadmeOmelet · · Last activity · 3 posts · 374 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 September 2005
Last activity
4 September 2005
Original author
OmManiPadmeOmelet
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
374
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I did not write this; got it in E-mail but thought it was interesting
    enough to pass on:

    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_09/007023.php

    CHRONOLOGY....Here's a timeline that outlines the fate of both
    FEMA and flood control projects in New Orleans under the Bush
    administration. Read it and weep:

    * January 2001: Bush appoints Joe Allbaugh, a crony from
    Texas, as head of FEMA. Allbaugh has no previous experience in
    disaster management.

    * April 2001: Budget Director Mitch Daniels announces the
    Bush administration's goal of privatizing much of FEMA's work.
    In May, Allbaugh confirms that FEMA will be downsized: "Many are
    concerned that federal disaster assistance may have evolved into
    both an oversized entitlement program...." he said.
    "Expectations of when the federal government should be involved
    and the degree of involvement may have ballooned beyond what is
    an appropriate level."

    * 2001: FEMA designates a major hurricane hitting New
    Orleans as one of the three "likeliest, most catastrophic
    disasters facing this country."

    * December 2002: After less than two years at FEMA, Allbaugh
    announces he is leaving to start up a consulting firm that
    advises companies seeking to do business in Iraq. He is
    succeeded by his deputy, Michael Brown, who, like Allbaugh, has
    no previous experience in disaster management.

    * March 2003: FEMA is downgraded from a cabinet level
    position and folded into the Department of Homeland Security.
    Its mission is refocused on fighting acts of terrorism.

    * 2003: Under its new organization chart within DHS, FEMA's
    preparation and planning functions are reassigned to a new
    Office of Preparedness and Response. FEMA will henceforth focus
    only on response and recovery.

    * Summer 2004: FEMA denies Louisiana's pre-disaster
    mitigation funding requests. Says Jefferson Parish flood zone
    manager Tom Rodrigue: "You would think we would get maximum
    consideration....This is what the grant program called for. We
    were more than qualified for it."

    * June 2004: The Army Corps of Engineers budget for levee
    construction in New Orleans is slashed. Jefferson Parish
    emergency management chiefs Walter Maestri comments: "It appears
    that the money has been moved in the president's budget to
    handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose
    that's the price we pay."

    * June 2005: Funding for the New Orleans district of the
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is cut by a record $71.2 million.
    One of the hardest-hit areas is the Southeast Louisiana Urban
    Flood Control Project, which was created after the May 1995
    flood to improve drainage in Jefferson, Orleans and St. Tammany
    parishes.

    * August 2005: While New Orleans is undergoing a slow motion
    catastrophe, Bush mugs for the cameras, cuts a cake for John
    McCain, plays the guitar for Mark Wills, delivers an address
    about V-J day, and continues with his vacation. When he finally
    gets around to acknowledging the scope of the unfolding
    disaster, he delivers only a photo op on Air Force One and a
    flat, defensive, laundry list speech in the Rose Garden.

    So: A crony with no relevant experience was installed as head of
    FEMA. Mitigation budgets for New Orleans were slashed even
    though it was known to be one of the top three risks in the
    country. FEMA was deliberately downsized as part of the Bush
    administration's conservative agenda to reduce the role of
    government. After DHS was created, FEMA's preparation and
    planning functions were taken away.

    Actions have consequences. No one could predict that a hurricane
    the size of Katrina would hit this year, but the slow federal
    response when it did happen was no accident. It was the result
    of four years of deliberate Republican policy and budget choices
    that favor ideology and partisan loyalty at the expense of
    operational competence. It's the Bush administration in a
    nutshell.

    ‹Kevin Drum
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  2. Joe Humble said:

    If people who made a poor choice in the midst of a disaster deserve to
    die hard then what do people who made poor choices over the course of
    many years, against the ongoing advice of many experts, deserve?

    Why not first find the person who thought the funding for the New
    Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should be cut by
    a record $71.2 million. While uncovering all the various people who
    deserve to die hard lets find that person or committee and start
    there.

    Why not find who'se to blame? Because it isn't know-able. People made
    the best decisions they could at every step. Or maybe just the least
    bad decision. There's never enough money, always a struggle how to
    apportion it. I don't recall writing *my* senator begging them to keep
    the levees funded in New Orleans. Did you?

    No, the blame game isn't useful for anyone at this point. Getting
    people fed and watered, getting temporary shelter, getting a works
    program in place: this is a priority. Someone somewhere came up with a
    disaster scenario like this and they need to pull it out, dust it off
    and present it and then get busy implementing it.

    Dally

  3. Joe Humble said:

    If people who made a poor choice in the midst of a disaster deserve to
    die hard then what do people who made poor choices over the course of
    many years, against the ongoing advice of many experts, deserve?

    Why not first find the person who thought the funding for the New
    Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should be cut by
    a record $71.2 million. While uncovering all the various people who
    deserve to die hard lets find that person or committee and start
    there.

    Why not find who'se to blame? Because it isn't know-able. People made
    the best decisions they could at every step. Or maybe just the least
    bad decision. There's never enough money, always a struggle how to
    apportion it. I don't recall writing *my* senator begging them to keep
    the levees funded in New Orleans. Did you?

    No, the blame game isn't useful for anyone at this point. Getting
    people fed and watered, getting temporary shelter, getting a works
    program in place: this is a priority. Someone somewhere came up with a
    disaster scenario like this and they need to pull it out, dust it off
    and present it and then get busy implementing it.

    Dally

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.