Power meters · Public discussion

Power Training Zones?

Started by mullerrj · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,421 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
28 April 2007
Last activity
29 April 2007
Original author
mullerrj
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,421
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Wasn't sure what the best method for determining Power Training Zones? Should I use Lactate Threshold Power Value, Functional Threshold Power (FTP), or base it off Max HR, etc? Thank You Rob

  2. mullerrj said:

    Wasn't sure what the best method for determining Power Training Zones? Should I use Lactate Threshold Power Value, Functional Threshold Power (FTP), or base it off Max HR, etc? Thank You Rob

    It depends on whose training schema you're using. If you want to work with Andy Coggan's training levels then you'll base everything on FTP. If you go with Ric Stern's zones you'll base things on MAP. I'm sure there are other systems out there that use other reference points. If you haven't done so, you should read Training and Racing with a Power Meter or surf over to Ric's site and have a look at his approach: cyclecoach.comcyclecoach.com

    If you work with WKO+ you have a couple of options regarding your training levels. I use Coggan's levels and like his system but like Ric's approach as well. Anyway there are a lot of ways to skin this cat so you need to pick a system and follow it.

    Good luck,
    Dave

  3. Dave..right now, I'm basing everying on Coggan's training levels since it seems to coincide pretty closely wtih Stern's zones based on MAP..but that's just for me. I didn't know if this was consistent for the masses. Thanks again.

    daveryanwyoming said:

    It depends on whose training schema you're using. If you want to work with Andy Coggan's training levels then you'll base everything on FTP. If you go with Ric Stern's zones you'll base things on MAP. I'm sure there are other systems out there that use other reference points. If you haven't done so, you should read Training and Racing with a Power Meter or surf over to Ric's site and have a look at his approach: cyclecoach.comcyclecoach.com

    If you work with WKO+ you have a couple of options regarding your training levels. I use Coggan's levels and like his system but like Ric's approach as well. Anyway there are a lot of ways to skin this cat so you need to pick a system and follow it.

    Good luck,
    Dave

  4. mullerrj said:

    Dave..right now, I'm basing everying on Coggan's training levels since it seems to coincide pretty closely wtih Stern's zones based on MAP..but that's just for me. I didn't know if this was consistent for the masses. Thanks again.

    for pretty much most cyclists, the two systems are fairly close to each other (usually only a few Watts different)

    ric

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.