It's about time some of these sports that make cycling at it's worst look clean got some serious attention. Wanna take any bets on what percentage of US pro athletes in the major sports would fail a WADA test. I'd peg it at over 90%. Bill C
It's about time some of these sports that make cycling at it's worst look clean got some serious attention. Wanna take any bets on what percentage of US pro athletes in the major sports would fail a WADA test. I'd peg it at over 90%. Bill C
I think that at every baseball game, three random picks from the winning team should have to pee in a cup. That means if you're on a good team there are 100 chances a year that you'll have to pee in a cup. It would be too expensive to test everybody on the winning team. I think that this method would balance the expense vs the possibility of getting caught fairly well.
Similar for basketball and football except that you'd probably adjust the numbers to keep the balance.
It's about time some of these sports that make cycling at it's
worst
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
look clean got some serious attention. Wanna take any bets on what percentage of US pro athletes in the major sports would fail a WADA test. I'd peg it at over 90%. Bill C
I think that at every baseball game, three random picks from the winning team should have to pee in a cup. That means if you're on a good team there are 100 chances a year that you'll have to pee in a cup. It would be too expensive to test everybody on the winning
team.
Quoted message said:
I think that this method would balance the expense vs the possibility of getting caught fairly well.
Similar for basketball and football except that you'd probably adjust the numbers to keep the balance.
The suggested revenue stream for the testing was to be supplied by the leagues. Since it looks like Baseball's minimum is around $320,000 a year for a scrub, and football $765,000 there wouldn't be a whole lot of trouble funding the testing. Hope they go for it. Bill C
The suggested revenue stream for the testing was to be supplied by the leagues. Since it looks like Baseball's minimum is around $320,000 a year for a scrub, and football $765,000 there wouldn't be a whole lot of trouble funding the testing. Hope they go for it.
Money isn't the issue. Handing off testing to an agency that actually wants to catch people is the issue.
What is funny about baseball is that they attempted to deflect the issue with a testing policy that was beyond lame. But it turned out that the problem was so pervasive that even a lame testing policy revealed a huge problem.
The suggested revenue stream for the testing was to be supplied by
the
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
leagues. Since it looks like Baseball's minimum is around $320,000
a
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
year for a scrub, and football $765,000 there wouldn't be a whole
lot
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
of trouble funding the testing. Hope they go for it.
Money isn't the issue. Handing off testing to an agency that actually wants to catch people is the issue.
What is funny about baseball is that they attempted to deflect the issue with a testing policy that was beyond lame. But it turned out that the problem was so pervasive that even a lame testing policy revealed a huge problem.
Bob Schwartz [email hidden]
Yeah, so they just left some things off the testing list and let everyone know that they weren't being tested for. Then the numbers went way down, what a shock. McCain (who I think is more than a bit squirrely) is insisting that MLB can't be trusted. I have more trust for some of the sleazy used car dealers that I used to paint cars for than Bud Selig. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for something good to come out of Congress. Dave Barry summed it up pretty well in his column on toilets that used less water when he said that they couldn't handle most acts of congress. Bill C