Road Cycling · Public discussion

Politically Incorrect.

Started by Tom Kunich · · Last activity · 141 posts · 9,719 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 January 2003
Last activity
28 January 2003
Original author
Tom Kunich
Posts
141
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
9,719
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 141
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    What a simplistic way to ignore all those that have no medical coverage


    and

    Quoted message said:

    can't afford to pay for medical visits. What is your solution? To ban government healthcare
    subsidies, even ban health insurance altogether, and let the free-market price all those illegal
    aliens right out of the


    country

    Quoted message said:

    while also pricing those citizens under the poverty-level out of life?

    So your way is to tax me while I'm working so that I can't save any money for retirement and then
    let the system callapse after all of the boomers hit retirement age. I must say, I like the way you
    are willing to trade my freedom for someone else's.

  2. "Canuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Canuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > But you see, if it were a joke making fun of the pronouciation by


    some

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > white southern cracker it would be OK.

    That would be the same thing as the original joke.

    I see, you are an equal opportunity sourpuss.

    How is that?

    I offered no judgements on whether ethnic or racial jokes are tasteful/tasteless. My posts only
    tried to define what is and isn't 'racial'.

    In order to be racist a comment has to be desired to be racist. A comment about someone being black
    and being negative about that person isn't enough to make it a racist comment. A comment about a
    Chinese accent may be hurtful to someone especially sensitive but that doesn't rise to the level of
    racism and you seem incapable of knowing the difference.

    All you have to do is to turn on network news any day of the week and you'll see network newscasters
    slandering men in general, white men in particular, anyone with money, anyone that opposes raising
    taxes, anyone that wants to straighten out social security so that it really will be a security net
    (check out Paterson's comments lately) or anyone that has any sort of conservative position even if
    that person is a died-in-the-wool extreme left wing liberal. It is perfectly OK in the general media
    to degrade these people and stultify their ideas.

    Some guy named Goldberg wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal in which he took that extremist
    conservative position, that network news should try to deliver a balanced view of the political
    spectrum. He reported that CBS news and all of the other network news bureaus, as shown by study
    after study, were wildly liberal and as a result quite by accident and not design, the liberal view
    some but not most of the news delivered.

    Goldberg admits that he has never in his life voted for a Republican, that he has consistantly
    supported liberal causes. He only felt that the news should be reported even-handedly and without a
    hidden (actually who believes that it is hidden in the least?) liberal agenda.

    He was driven from CBS, his 20 year career as a news reporter destroyed. CBS in the form of such
    notables as Dan Rather declared him persona non grata and Rather refered to Goldberg, a Jewish
    liberal if ever there was one, as having a "well known conservative political agenda".

    The point of all this is that the meaning of racist and racism has been distorted far beyond what it
    really is by people who are staggeringly wealthy and whose feelings of guilt for doing so little to
    earn that wealth has led them to believe and the entire white race has it too easy and that we ought
    to be taxed into oblivion to pay for every supposed affront to any non-white minority. Since most of
    them live in almost entirely white suburbs or white enclaves where their children go to almost
    entirely white highend schools they haven't a clue what is happening out here in the real world
    where 97% of the white men have to work their asses off to make a lower middle class living and who
    are taxed to the breaking point.

    Well, all you have to do is read history to find that blacks were the one's that sold blacks into
    slavery the largest percentage of the time. Arab traders would pay coastal tribes for black slaves
    and those coastal tribes would raid inland tribes for slaves. Whites were a long ways down the
    slavery food chain and that is a fact. In many areas of Africa TODAY slavery is still practiced
    though it is generally given lip service as being illegal. Consider where the idea of black Muslims
    came from - you couldn't be freed by a Muslim unless you declared yourself a Muslim! Do we hear
    about those people actually practicing slavery as being evil? No, all of today's white Americans are
    held as guilty despite the fact that less than 1% of them come from families that ever held slaves.
    I am forced to pay taxes that are used by my government to give advantages to blacks that I never
    had and despite the fact that my family didn't come to this country until after the civil war and
    despite the fact that my heritage is Croatian, Irish and Jewish - all groups that were held as
    slaves or near slaves. The word "slave" comes from the name of my race.

    And I see dispicable people like Kyle suggest to me that I'm racist!

    Maybe you Canadians ought to study a bit more of your own history with special interest in the
    treatment of Indians and Inuit. And then perhaps you could stop telling Americans what is racist and
    what isn't.

  3. "cucycln" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Tom....point out your source of facts on this.... or you just shooting


    from

    Quoted message said:

    the hip because you are so bored and have nothing else to do? again!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The pathetic part about all of this is the patent denial of Canadians


    when

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    there is an entire market segment of the US health care system devoted entirely to Canadians.

    Isn't it about time you try to school us all in what racist ideas I have?

    San Francisco, CA - While American politicians tout Canadian health care and lead bus tours across
    the border, Canadians themselves increasingly board buses for the United States to seek treatment
    and purchase prescription drugs not available under their own government plan. This is according to
    Lessons from the North: Bus Travelers Bring the Reality of Rationed Health Care and Price-Controlled
    Drugs over the Border, a briefing released today by the Pacific Research Institute (PRI).

    On February 3, ABC aired a report by correspondent Deborah Amos in Toronto, depicting a country
    "struggling with universal healthcare." Most of Amos' report was taken up by grim descriptions of
    crowded hospitals: "The emergency rooms in Toronto hospitals are so clogged this winter, patients
    wait hours for critical treatment," Amos reported. "They sleep on stretchers in drafty hallways. And
    wait days for a hospital bed."

    "If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free."
    - P.J. O'Rourke

    By William McArthur, former chief coroner for British Columbia. He is a palliative care physician
    and senior fellow in health policy studies at the Fraser Institute.

    (speaking about Canada's health care system) "Canadians over the age of 65 use health care at four
    times the rate of those under 65 and thus are more exposed to the deficiencies. Moreover, the
    treatments elders need most often are the ones where the worst shortages exist. According to the
    Fraser Institute's annual survey of hospital waiting lists, the median patient waits 70% longer than
    is medically reasonable, in the view of their physicians. Waits for cardiac surgery are 145% longer
    than medically reasonable, 90% longer for orthopedics (hips and knees) and 75% longer for
    ophthalmologic (cataracts and lens replacement) surgery." (Note the term "medically reasonable" - do
    you understand what that means?)

    From the von Mises Institute:

    "This popular superficial view of Canada's health care system as the national "sacred trust" and the
    envy of the rest of the world does not reveal how poorly informed people really are about how health
    care is funded and delivered. In fact, if Canadians knew as much as they think they do about the
    economic and moral workings of Medicare, they might not be as enthusiastic as they are about their
    cherished right to "free" health care."

    In case you think that the Canadian government doesn't know it what about this statement by a
    Canadian MP?

    "Miss Deborah Grey (Edmonton North, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, today 200,000 Canadians are still on waiting
    lines in hospitals. But if they are wealthy or desperate they could jump the queue and fly down to
    the United States for treatment. They could pay cash for health care. If that is not two tier, if
    that is not American style health care, I do not know what is."

    The facts are that Canada has benefitted from the fact that they are a far healthier population from
    the start then the much more greatly mixed American population. They admit as much. Also the
    Canadian medical system is one of medical rationing and not one of medical service. This works
    passably well when the population is young and healthy but when Canada's baby boomers start putting
    a greater strain on their system as is just beginning, it is likely to collapse like the house of
    cards that it is.

  4. <http://www.michellemalkin.com/bio.html>

    Very smart and also a "babe!!"

    Tom Kunich said:

    "Canuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Canuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > "]news:[email hidden]...
    >>
    >> But you see, if it were a joke making fun of the pronouciation by


    some

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> white southern cracker it would be OK.
    >
    > That would be the same thing as the original joke.

    I see, you are an equal opportunity sourpuss.

    How is that?

    I offered no judgements on whether ethnic or racial jokes are tasteful/tasteless. My posts only
    tried to define what is and isn't 'racial'.

    In order to be racist a comment has to be desired to be racist. A comment about someone being
    black and being negative about that person isn't enough to make it a racist comment. A comment
    about a Chinese accent may be hurtful to someone especially sensitive but that doesn't rise to the
    level of racism and you seem incapable of knowing the difference.

    All you have to do is to turn on network news any day of the week and you'll see network
    newscasters slandering men in general, white men in particular, anyone with money, anyone that
    opposes raising taxes, anyone that wants to straighten out social security so that it really will
    be a security net (check out Paterson's comments lately) or anyone that has any sort of
    conservative position even if that person is a died-in-the-wool extreme left wing liberal. It is
    perfectly OK in the general media to degrade these people and stultify their ideas.

    Some guy named Goldberg wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal in which he took that
    extremist conservative position, that network news should try to deliver a balanced view of the
    political spectrum. He reported that CBS news and all of the other network news bureaus, as shown
    by study after study, were wildly liberal and as a result quite by accident and not design, the
    liberal view some but not most of the news delivered.

    Goldberg admits that he has never in his life voted for a Republican, that he has consistantly
    supported liberal causes. He only felt that the news should be reported even-handedly and without
    a hidden (actually who believes that it is hidden in the least?) liberal agenda.

    He was driven from CBS, his 20 year career as a news reporter destroyed. CBS in the form of such
    notables as Dan Rather declared him persona non grata and Rather refered to Goldberg, a Jewish
    liberal if ever there was one, as having a "well known conservative political agenda".

    The point of all this is that the meaning of racist and racism has been distorted far beyond what
    it really is by people who are staggeringly wealthy and whose feelings of guilt for doing so
    little to earn that wealth has led them to believe and the entire white race has it too easy and
    that we ought to be taxed into oblivion to pay for every supposed affront to any non-white
    minority. Since most of them live in almost entirely white suburbs or white enclaves where their
    children go to almost entirely white highend schools they haven't a clue what is happening out
    here in the real world where 97% of the white men have to work their asses off to make a lower
    middle class living and who are taxed to the breaking point.

    Well, all you have to do is read history to find that blacks were the one's that sold blacks into
    slavery the largest percentage of the time. Arab traders would pay coastal tribes for black slaves
    and those coastal tribes would raid inland tribes for slaves. Whites were a long ways down the
    slavery food chain and that is a fact. In many areas of Africa TODAY slavery is still practiced
    though it is generally given lip service as being illegal. Consider where the idea of black
    Muslims came from - you couldn't be freed by a Muslim unless you declared yourself a Muslim! Do we
    hear about those people actually practicing slavery as being evil? No, all of today's white
    Americans are held as guilty despite the fact that less than 1% of them come from families that
    ever held slaves. I am forced to pay taxes that are used by my government to give advantages to
    blacks that I never had and despite the fact that my family didn't come to this country until
    after the civil war and despite the fact that my heritage is Croatian, Irish and Jewish - all
    groups that were held as slaves or near slaves. The word "slave" comes from the name of my race.

    And I see dispicable people like Kyle suggest to me that I'm racist!

    Maybe you Canadians ought to study a bit more of your own history with special interest in the
    treatment of Indians and Inuit. And then perhaps you could stop telling Americans what is racist
    and what isn't.

  5. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    In order to be racist a comment has to be desired to be racist. A comment about someone being
    black and being negative about that person isn't


    enough

    Quoted message said:

    to make it a racist comment. A comment about a Chinese accent may be


    hurtful

    Quoted message said:

    to someone especially sensitive but that doesn't rise to the level of


    racism

    Quoted message said:

    and you seem incapable of knowing the difference.

    Definitions of such are subjective, therefore, it is not possible for everyone to have the
    same view.

    BTW, if you don't think it matters, how about sending that joke to everyone at work? If there isn't
    a flap, then you'll know that you're correct.

  6. I see your point......but every senior care system is under attack. Look at Medicare......it's
    ignoring the seniors, people can't afford the necessary drugs they need in the US too! You said that
    Canadians are coming across the boarder for drugs they can't get in Canada.....but then US citizens
    are running to get CHEAPER drugs then they can buy in the US....it's major problem for Canadians as
    it is driving up the price there too! Then there is Mexico.....where everyone is going! So it's
    major problem everywhere!

    What I fail to see is that US entire system that's catering to Canadians.............? Or did I read
    you wrong? "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "cucycln" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Tom....point out your source of facts on this.... or you just shooting


    from

    Quoted message said:

    the hip because you are so bored and have nothing else to do? again!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The pathetic part about all of this is the patent denial of Canadians


    when

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    there is an entire market segment of the US health care system devoted entirely to Canadians.

    Isn't it about time you try to school us all in what racist ideas I have?

    San Francisco, CA - While American politicians tout Canadian health care


    and

    Quoted message said:

    lead bus tours across the border, Canadians themselves increasingly board buses for the United
    States to seek treatment and purchase prescription drugs not available under their own government
    plan. This is according to Lessons from the North: Bus Travelers Bring the Reality of Rationed
    Health Care and Price-Controlled Drugs over the Border, a briefing released today by the Pacific
    Research Institute (PRI).

    On February 3, ABC aired a report by correspondent Deborah Amos in


    Toronto,

    Quoted message said:

    depicting a country "struggling with universal healthcare." Most of Amos' report was taken up by
    grim descriptions of crowded hospitals: "The emergency rooms in Toronto hospitals are so clogged
    this winter, patients wait hours for critical treatment," Amos reported. "They sleep on


    stretchers

    Quoted message said:

    in drafty hallways. And wait days for a hospital bed."

    "If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free."
    - P.J. O'Rourke

    By William McArthur, former chief coroner for British Columbia. He is a palliative care physician
    and senior fellow in health policy studies at


    the

    Quoted message said:

    Fraser Institute.

    (speaking about Canada's health care system) "Canadians over the age of 65 use health care at four
    times the rate of those under 65 and thus are more exposed to the deficiencies. Moreover, the
    treatments elders need most


    often

    Quoted message said:

    are the ones where the worst shortages exist. According to the Fraser Institute's annual survey of
    hospital waiting lists, the median patient waits 70% longer than is medically reasonable, in the
    view of their physicians. Waits for cardiac surgery are 145% longer than medically reasonable, 90%
    longer for orthopedics (hips and knees) and 75% longer for ophthalmologic (cataracts and lens
    replacement) surgery." (Note the term "medically reasonable" - do you understand what that means?)

    From the von Mises Institute:

    "This popular superficial view of Canada's health care system as the national "sacred trust" and
    the envy of the rest of the world does not reveal how poorly informed people really are about how
    health care is


    funded

    Quoted message said:

    and delivered. In fact, if Canadians knew as much as they think they do about the economic and
    moral workings of Medicare, they might not be as enthusiastic as they are about their cherished
    right to "free" health


    care."

    Quoted message said:

    In case you think that the Canadian government doesn't know it what about this statement by a
    Canadian MP?

    "Miss Deborah Grey (Edmonton North, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, today 200,000 Canadians are still on
    waiting lines in hospitals. But if they are wealthy or desperate they could jump the queue and fly
    down to the United States


    for

    Quoted message said:

    treatment. They could pay cash for health care. If that is not two tier,


    if

    Quoted message said:

    that is not American style health care, I do not know what is."

    The facts are that Canada has benefitted from the fact that they are a far healthier population
    from the start then the much more greatly mixed American population. They admit as much. Also the
    Canadian medical system


    is

    Quoted message said:

    one of medical rationing and not one of medical service. This works


    passably

    Quoted message said:

    well when the population is young and healthy but when Canada's baby


    boomers

    Quoted message said:

    start putting a greater strain on their system as is just beginning, it is likely to collapse like
    the house of cards that it is.

  7. Steve said:

    <http://www.michellemalkin.com/bio.html>

    Very smart and also a "babe!!"

    Poster child for the fascists. Why did we ever let her parents immigrate with the rest of the
    unwashed masses?

    Greg

    --
    "Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late, the battles we fought were long and hard,
    just not to be consumed by rock n' roll..." - The Mekons

  8. Canuck said:

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In order to be racist a comment has to be desired to be racist. A comment about someone being
    black and being negative about that person isn't

    enough

    Quoted message said:

    to make it a racist comment. A comment about a Chinese accent may be

    hurtful

    Quoted message said:

    to someone especially sensitive but that doesn't rise to the level of

    racism

    Quoted message said:

    and you seem incapable of knowing the difference.

    Definitions of such are subjective, therefore, it is not possible for everyone to have the
    same view.

    BTW, if you don't think it matters, how about sending that joke to everyone at work? If there
    isn't a flap, then you'll know that you're correct.

    Now how would that be a test since everyone is afraid of the suede denim secret PC police? You never
    know when your cubicle neighbor is a spy for the PC fascists.

    Greg

    --
    "Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late, the battles we fought were long and hard,
    just not to be consumed by rock n' roll..." - The Mekons

  9. "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Now how would that be a test since everyone is afraid of the suede denim secret PC police? You
    never know when your cubicle neighbor is a spy for the PC fascists.

    Like I said before, on such a subjective matter it is not possible for everyone to have the
    same view.

  10. Tom Kunich said:

    Maybe you just don't understand this country. In this country we don't forcibly lock up insane
    people. It is probably too much for you to understand that insane people have some rights as
    well and unless they are an immediate danger to themselves or others it is against the law to
    detain them.


    So which is it? Either you don't forcibly lock up the mentally ill, or you do forcibly lock them up
    if they pose a danger to themselves or others. You can't have it both ways.

    Quoted message said:

    get insane people or drug addicts or whatever the 'cause dujour' is,


    Since correcting all your mistakes is too big a job for Tom Paterson alone, even if he is retired,
    let me give you a freebie: du jour is two words.

    ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [email hidden] Kyle Legate [email hidden]

    Tower of Tongues:Thursday PM:10:30-11:30 EDT:http://cfmu.mcmaster.ca moon
    musick:ritual:IDM:experimental(electronica):minimalism:glitch
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

  11. Tom Kunich said:

    "Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Kunich said:

    Maybe you just don't understand this country. In this country we don't forcibly lock up insane
    people. It is probably too much for you to understand that insane people have some rights as
    well and unless they are an immediate danger to themselves or others it is against the law to
    detain them.


    So which is it? Either you don't forcibly lock up the mentally ill, or you do forcibly lock them
    up if they pose a danger to themselves or others. You can't have it both ways.

    I didn't think that you'd have an answer to the real world outside of your hallucinations.

    The actions of all Liberals are quite predictable. When confronted with the truth they either:

    1) deny it
    2) lie about it
    3) change the subject.


    You must be liberal because you are attempting point number 3. Answer my question, and no lying
    because I have experience in this area: my gf's mom has recently been temporarily committed twice
    for her paranoid schizophrenia.

    ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [email hidden] Kyle Legate [email hidden]

    Tower of Tongues:Thursday PM:10:30-11:30 EDT:http://cfmu.mcmaster.ca moon
    musick:ritual:IDM:experimental(electronica):minimalism:glitch
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

  12. "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Kunich said:

    That is a complete and utter fabrication. Network news tried to pass off every single thing that
    the "homeless" activists decided was best for their cause but apparently you haven't kept up.
    Several homeless activists came clean. They fabricated almost every fact about the homeless.
    When the best estimates were that this country had about 300,000 homeless (something that should
    have been shocking enough) they got the network news hacks to report that there were 19 million
    and climbing homeless. They got the network news moguls to report that most homeless were able
    bodied people. That was a lie. Most homeless are insane or drug or alcohol addicts. Able bodied
    men are seldom homeless and find that there is a lot of help from the government and from all
    sorts of charities. I personally talked to some of those and they told me that the problem
    wasn't getting food of temporary shelter but putting together the trememdous about of money it
    takes for first and last month's rent and a security deposit. Welfare has taken care of that for
    two decades now.

    Not being able to afford first and last still means homeless, you moron.

    I note with great pleasure that you purposely ignored the part where I said that able bodied people
    are only temporarily homeless. Mostly for reasons such as moving to a new state or especially in the
    cases of young men - living beyond their means for too long. They almost always recover from this
    plight and there are all sorts of government and charitable help for them when they reach that
    point. But if you aren't willing to tell the truth about even the smallest detail of your phony
    beliefs you certainly aren't going to see a brazen attempt to lie about the homeless.

    Quoted message said:

    And now that you bring up the insane, which I wasn't going to go into, why are they on the
    streets? They can't work to support themselves. Many of them don't want to be on the streets.
    Could it be because your hero cut back federal funds for inpatient psychiatric hospitals sending
    them all out on the street?

    Maybe you just don't understand this country. In this country we don't forcibly lock up insane
    people. It is probably too much for you to understand that insane people have some rights as well
    and unless they are an immediate danger to themselves or others it is against the law to detain
    them. I understand that you think that everyone is out to get insane people or drug addicts or
    whatever the 'cause dujour' is, but the facts are that insane people are homeless because they
    choose to be so. Most can commit themselves voluntarily any time and be taken care of. That's more
    than a sane lower income white man can get.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why do we have so many families living under the poverty level?

    Network news reported that there were many families living under the poverty level. Government
    welfare offices reported the same thing. When it was investigated it was found that "poverty
    level" was a certain income level for a family. If they had three kids the poverty level was
    something like $30,000 a year.

    2002 level for a 5 person family is $21,000. Please post your budget in your reply on how you
    would buy a home and several cars on $21,000 a year.

    Please cite a reliable article about all of these homeless families that you claim are out there. I
    really would like to see where you get your wild-eyed ideas.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why are there undernourished children in this great country of ours?

    That was covered 25 years ago. Food is not a problem. Nutrician is. And most of the time it
    isn't because of poverty or lack of food. It is because of divorced mother homes and the mother
    often has little or no education and doesn't understand what nutrician means. And one of the
    primary reasons that young ignorant mothers were around was because of the culture of sex freely
    spread by the general media in this country. Which is another reason that other more
    conservative societies see us as little more than animals.

    You mean the societies that wrap their women from head to toe?

    Again, when confronted with facts you change the subject. Greg, you are the one that claims that
    there are large numbers of undernourished kids out there. I used to hear that in my neighborhood
    while I was growing up. And yet I never saw it. Only that claim that it was so.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Why do so many not have adequate healthcare?

    What is adequate healthcare? Few aliens have any problems getting free medical care. Few
    minorities have problems getting free medical care. The one's that suffer most from lack of
    medical care are low income white people whom the government and most of all Liberals do not
    feel any pain for.

    You keep saying that "aliens" get better care than citizens. Please point me to even the most
    right-wing website out there that has any so-called proof of that favoritism.

    Please point me to your statistics that prove otherwise. Why are you claiming that there are so many
    people out there with insufficient health care. In fact, most people without health care are young
    men who are healthy to begin with. And most of the numbers quoted about how many people are without
    health care purposely hide the fact that it is a rotating population. That is, that one family is
    without healthcare for the three months it takes to find a new job. During that time another person
    becomes jobless and OPTS not to buy COBRA. Granted the COBRA coverage is expensive and many many not
    be in a finanacial position to do so.

    But your suggestion that there are large groups of people going without health care for long periods
    of time is a completely inaccurate depiction.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The problem with you Greg is that you are too stupid to think about any of this beyond reading
    the occasional lefty news reports. You don't go down to the local emergency rooms and see them
    filled to overflowing with aliens while low income citizens get nothing.

    I've taken my uninsured friends and neighbors to the County ER several times. Nobody was picking
    "aliens" over my friends. Tell me, Tom, how do you pick out an alien without asking for their
    papers? Do you have some magical powers to discern between legal and illegal? Or is it just the
    color of their skin and/or ESL?

    Here's a clue - they can't speak English at all and they don't have any identification.

    My sister-in-law (whose is a Filipina) works for the local emergency hospital in the book keeping
    department. Perhaps you can tell her that there aren't any illegal aliens using the county services.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    In France a homeless person lives about two years. In the USA they are fat until they die of the
    effects of their addictions or are carted off to the mental hospitals where you'd argue they
    shouldn't be held against their will.

    I have never seen a fat homeless person. Do you hallucinate these images of fat homeless people?
    And they are no longer carted off to mental hospitals because your hero axed federal contributions
    to their budgets LONG ago.

    I suggest that you've never gone down to the local missions.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You WANT to believe that the USA is evil because you want to hate a lot more than you want to
    know the truth.

    I don't hate anything about the USA except for evil, hate-mongering, racist, sexist [censored] like
    you. And you call me sick. What a joke.

    Every time you write the hate pours out of you. If I were you I'd seek some professional help. But
    you're obviously too busy running your bosses business for him and making him millions while he pays
    you a mere pitance.

  13. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "tokugawa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Health care administrative costs (% of health care dollar):

    United States (Medicare, Medicaid, HMO's, PPO's, etc.) ........13% Canada (Single payer system)
    ...................................3%

    Why?

    Because there is no paperwork to prove claims in Canada while in the USA the claims forms are long
    and complicated and often are sent back 3 or 4 times for further information.

    snip

    Quoted message said:

    Canadians with money that require rapid health care come to the USA where our less than perfect
    system is still superior to a system that would often take longer to get a patient in than his
    expected lifespan with a serious illness.

    "With money" gets you anything you want in the U.S., doesn't it?

    The bottom line for health care is life expectancy in Canada beats the U.S.

    There are far more Americans making the trip to Canada for health care services, than vice versa.
    Prescription drugs comes to mind.

    Many Americans find themselves in Medicaid "spend down" mode. After they lose their health
    insurance, they must improvish themselves before they can get life-saving heath care. Not a pretty
    picture if you ever have experienced this happen to somebody. This does not happen in Canada.

    For-profit American heath insurance companies are parasites. Only the .01% of the population who are
    stockholders or obscenely overpaid executives benefit from the present system. Plus the people who
    process claims for insurance companies. Their purpose: deny claims. The better they are, the higher
    their salary. For the 99.99% of Americans who don't own stock in health insurance companies, nor
    work for health insurance companies, there is no upside.

  14. Will you pedants please shut up. You are not impressing anyone with your knowledge of politics,
    labor unions, social issues, or anything else.

  15. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Now do the same for a universal single payer health care plan. Don't mess around. Put numbers on
    it and tell how much of the GDP it will likely chew up.

    Depends on how it is funded. It's besides the point anyway, I don't know if a universal single
    payer plan is the way to go. I do know with health costs increasing far more rapidly than the
    current rate of inflation (my monthly premiums went from $242 to $255, that's only 5% but my
    benefits dropped considerably), and approximately 44 million uninsured citizens something clearly
    has to be done.

    Health care administrative costs (% of health care dollar):

    United States (Medicare, Medicaid, HMO's, PPO's, etc.) ........13% Canada (Single payer system)
    ...................................3%

    Why?

    1. Private insurers' number one priority in a capitalist system is to make a profit. All other
    considerations are secondary.

    2. Private insurers have a financial incentive to deny claims. They work very hard to deny claims. A
    friend of mind recently had her claim denied unjustly. She pursued legal means and won her case.
    Good news, you say? WRONG! It cost her $20,000 in legal fees (which, of course, are not
    reimbursed) and it delayed payment to her for two years WHEN SHE REALLY NEEDED THE MONEY. The
    f***ing insurance company hired private investigators who violated her privacy, and produced
    evidence which did not hold up in court. In addition, she suffered from post-tramatic stress
    disorder after the trauma she received when she found out about the snooping.

    3. The U.S. has 3,000 different health insurance entities, each with their own internal set of
    rules and regulations as to which claims are paid. We're talking about a lot of wasteful
    paperwork here.

    4. The 3,000 different entities each must 'sell' their product or go out of business. So currently,
    some of your health care dollar goes to pay for marketing and advertising costs. Advertising like
    those 'feel good' television commercials intended to establish 'brand identity'. Brand identity
    is when companies get more for their services because people remember their name. It adds nothing
    to health care. Zero. Zip. Nada. The null set.

    While high medical bills are the #1 cause of bankruptcies in the United States, nobody is ever
    denied necessary medical care in Canada at a hospital.

    As compared to the way the Canadian system is financed, the U.S. system is like a leech which sucks
    your blood. It produces a lot of harm and it provides no benefit, except to stockholders and
    sometimes to extremely wealthy executives, who make up 0.01% of the population. Tough break for the
    other 99.99% of us.

  16. "tokugawa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "tokugawa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Health care administrative costs (% of health care dollar):

    United States (Medicare, Medicaid, HMO's, PPO's, etc.) ........13% Canada (Single payer
    system) ...................................3%

    Why?

    Because there is no paperwork to prove claims in Canada while in the USA


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    claims forms are long and complicated and often are sent back 3 or 4


    times

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    for further information.

    Canadians with money that require rapid health care come to the USA


    where

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    our less than perfect system is still superior to a system that would


    often

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    take longer to get a patient in than his expected lifespan with a


    serious

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    illness.

    "With money" gets you anything you want in the U.S., doesn't it?

    Sure, it sucks if you don't have money. But you DO understand that in Canada if you have all the
    money in the world you can't get any better medical care than a homeless person? While the level of
    medical care in Canada is very high in some regards, in others it sucks. And the average medical
    care is lower and much slower than in the USA. This is the same experience as all other countries
    with socialized medicine. Canada has always been held up as an example because their system seemed
    to be actually working though closer scrutiny showed that the reason that it was working was because
    of the healthier, younger population with lower numbers of chronically ill or severely ill patients.

    Quoted message said:

    The bottom line for health care is life expectancy in Canada beats the U.S.

    The bottom line is that it doesn't and the proof is that all of the major US cities along the
    borders have entire departments that do nothing but service Canadians who come across the border for
    medical care.

    Quoted message said:

    There are far more Americans making the trip to Canada for health care services, than vice versa.
    Prescription drugs comes to mind.

    Prescription drugs in Canada can cost 1/3rd what they do in the USA. The reason is that they are
    subsidized by the Canadian Health Care system. The down side of this is that the system is EXTREMELY
    slow to allow newer medicines so most of the prescrition drugs available in Canada are several years
    behind those prescribed in the USA. So by crossing the border you can get cheap drugs IF YOU HAPPEN
    to have a prescription for the drugs that are sold there.

    Please be aware that older drugs are usually outdated because newer drugs are more efficacious or
    have fewer or less serious side effects and this is nothing to poo-poo since large numbers of people
    are made ill or die each year from drug side effects.

    Quoted message said:

    Many Americans find themselves in Medicaid "spend down" mode. After they lose their health
    insurance, they must improvish themselves before they can get life-saving heath care. Not a pretty
    picture if you ever have experienced this happen to somebody. This does not happen in Canada.

    Yeah, instead they are put in a line and die waiting for medical care.

    Quoted message said:

    For-profit American heath insurance companies are parasites. Only the .01% of the population who
    are stockholders or obscenely overpaid executives benefit from the present system. Plus the people
    who process claims for insurance companies. Their purpose: deny claims. The better they are, the
    higher their salary. For the 99.99% of Americans who don't own stock in health insurance
    companies, nor work for health insurance companies, there is no upside.

    Last time I looked, 80% of the population was covered by medical insurance. What would lead you to
    believe otherwise? I'm sure that there are tons of insurance company employees who would like to
    deny claims for a higher salary but that is a complete fabrication on your part. My ex-inlaws worked
    in the insurance industry as does the past president of our cycling club. They have a lot of bad
    things to say about the actions of insurance companies but it all boils down to slowing payments not
    throwing them out.

    I'm sure that you'll scream about the 20% who aren't covered but if you look it up you'll find that
    that group is very high in healthy young men who OPT to have no insurance and save the money. Also
    in that group are people that are between jobs and people who are under government programs and
    don't need other insurance.

    Also there are people that need insurance and don't have it. There are people in Canada dying
    without health care because there is none available in their areas.

  17. "Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Kunich said:

    Maybe you just don't understand this country. In this country we don't forcibly lock up insane
    people. It is probably too much for you to understand that insane people have some rights as
    well and unless they are an immediate danger to themselves or others it is against the law to
    detain them.


    So which is it? Either you don't forcibly lock up the mentally ill, or you do forcibly lock them
    up if they pose a danger to themselves or others. You can't have it both ways.

    I didn't think that you'd have an answer to the real world outside of your hallucinations.

    The actions of all Liberals are quite predictable. When confronted with the truth they either:

    1) deny it
    2) lie about it
    3) change the subject.

  18. "tokugawa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Health care administrative costs (% of health care dollar):

    United States (Medicare, Medicaid, HMO's, PPO's, etc.) ........13% Canada (Single payer system)
    ...................................3%

    Why?

    Because there is no paperwork to prove claims in Canada while in the USA the claims forms are long
    and complicated and often are sent back 3 or 4 times for further information.

    Yes, this is often because insurance companies have found that they can delay payment and maximize
    their profits in this manner but don't pretend that insurance companies are making money on health
    insurance because they aren't. MedLife just went belly up because they DIDN'T use these tactics. A
    system closest to the Canadian Health System is the Kaiser Health Care System and most people that
    have used it don't like it and try to use some other sort of health system.

    Quoted message said:

    1. Private insurers' number one priority in a capitalist system is to make a profit. All other
    considerations are secondary.

    That's true. However, it is ALL businesses number one priority to make a profit. If you are
    suggesting that you can somehow make a non-profit healthcare business work think again. Most of the
    hospitals in the USA wree nonprofit before the 60's and they were chronically underfunded,
    undermanned and had very poor technological advances. After for-profit hospitals began showing up
    doctors switched over in droves. They got better equipment, better working conditions, better
    patient facilities and better payment.

    Quoted message said:

    2. Private insurers have a financial incentive to deny claims. They work very hard to deny claims.
    A friend of mind recently had her claim denied unjustly. She pursued legal means and won her
    case. Good news, you say? WRONG! It cost her $20,000 in legal fees (which, of course, are not
    reimbursed) and it delayed payment to her for two years WHEN SHE REALLY NEEDED THE MONEY. The
    f***ing insurance company hired private investigators who violated her privacy, and produced
    evidence which did not hold up in court. In addition, she suffered from post-tramatic stress
    disorder after the trauma she received when she found out about the snooping.

    1) Her legal fees to recover losses were recoverable if the case was properly filed. 2) If her
    privacy was violated to obtain evidence against her that evidence besides being a matter of
    public record is also proof of illegal acts and is probably useable in criminal and civil cases
    against the insurance company.

    There certainly are evil insurance companies. Personally I would NEVER use Farmer's Insurance
    Company for anything. But there are civil remedies for their actions.

    Quoted message said:

    While high medical bills are the #1 cause of bankruptcies in the United States, nobody is ever
    denied necessary medical care in Canada at a hospital.

    I don't know where you've gotten that idea but all of the statistics show that the medical system in
    Canada does not work well for diseases of aging, or chronic illnesses. Surprise, the once young and
    healthy Canadian population is now aging and contracting chronic diseases. They also have had an
    extremely liberal immigration policy and it is showing up with all sorts of imported chronic and
    severe illnesses and all of this is beginning to severely stress the medical system.

    The Canadian Health Care System is not a system of health care but a system of health care
    rationing.

    Canadians with money that require rapid health care come to the USA where our less than perfect
    system is still superior to a system that would often take longer to get a patient in than his
    expected lifespan with a serious illness.

  19. Canuck said:

    "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    What a simplistic way to ignore all those that have no medical coverage

    and

    Quoted message said:

    can't afford to pay for medical visits. What is your solution? To ban government healthcare
    subsidies, even ban health insurance altogether, and let the free-market price all those illegal
    aliens right out of the

    country

    Quoted message said:

    while also pricing those citizens under the poverty-level out of life?

    Here I was thinking you are a crusty old man and you break out the compassionate side.

    No, I just have issues with effete and impudent snobs who can't take a joke. The rest of me is in
    complete disagreement with anything TK or that yappy little pomeranian stands for.

    Greg

    --
    "Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late, the battles we fought were long and hard,
    just not to be consumed by rock n' roll..." - The Mekons

  20. "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    No, I just have issues with effete and impudent snobs who can't take a joke. The rest of me is in
    complete disagreement with anything TK or that yappy little pomeranian stands for.

    I am an effete impudent snob?

    I tried to keep the conversation as cordial as possible, perhaps that makes me effete, but impudent
    and snobbish, hmmmm, just because I disagree with you.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.