I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling models. Any reason to go w/ the
720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling computer w/ cadence? Are all the
functions except cadenc wireless? Thanx in advance. andy
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Polar 710 vs. 720 monitors
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 6 April 2003
- Last activity
- 8 April 2003
- Original author
- Trifox13
- Posts
- 4
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 1,380
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"trifox13" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling models. Any reason to go w/ the
720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling computer w/ cadence? Are all
the functions except cadenc wireless? Thanx in advance. andyI don't see much difference between the 710i and the 720i. I have the 710 (the version before 710i)
and absolutely love it. I use it as my computer and my HRM without problems. The software isn't
anything fancy, but it gets the job done. Both the cadence sensor and the power sensor are wireless. -
In article said:
I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling models. Any reason to go w/ the
720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling computer w/ cadence? Are all
the functions except cadenc wireless?The only difference between the 710 and the 720 is that the 720 has a stainless steel face, making
it a little more durable. It's getting harder to find the 710, so I suspect Polar is phasing it out.
I bought the 720 last month and have 1406 miles on it so far. The only downside is that electrical
interference can temporarily jam the wireless signal, showing 68 mph or 196 cadence. This doesn't
happen very often, and it has little impact on the aggregate measurements.All of the functions (heart, speed, cadence) are wireless. If you buy the expensive power
measurement option, all functions except heart rate are wired.
--
terry morse Palo Alto, CA terrymorse.combikeOpen ↗ -
thanx, andy "Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
In article said:
I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling
models.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Any reason to go w/ the 720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling
computer w/ cadence? Are all the functions except
cadencQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
wireless?
The only difference between the 710 and the 720 is that the 720 has a stainless steel face, making
it a little more durable. It's getting harder to find the 710, so I suspect Polar is phasing it
out. I bought the 720 last month and have 1406 miles on it so far. The only downside is that
electrical interference can temporarily jam the wireless signal, showing 68 mph or 196 cadence.
This doesn't happen very often, and it has little impact on the aggregate measurements.All of the functions (heart, speed, cadence) are wireless. If you buy the expensive power
measurement option, all functions except heart rate are wired.
--
terry morse Palo Alto, CA terrymorse.combikeOpen ↗
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.