Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Polar 710 vs. 720 monitors

Started by Trifox13 · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,380 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 April 2003
Last activity
8 April 2003
Original author
Trifox13
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,380
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling models. Any reason to go w/ the
    720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling computer w/ cadence? Are all the
    functions except cadenc wireless? Thanx in advance. andy

  2. "trifox13" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling models. Any reason to go w/ the
    720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling computer w/ cadence? Are all
    the functions except cadenc wireless? Thanx in advance. andy

    I don't see much difference between the 710i and the 720i. I have the 710 (the version before 710i)
    and absolutely love it. I use it as my computer and my HRM without problems. The software isn't
    anything fancy, but it gets the job done. Both the cadence sensor and the power sensor are wireless.

  3. In article said:

    I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling models. Any reason to go w/ the
    720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling computer w/ cadence? Are all
    the functions except cadenc wireless?

    The only difference between the 710 and the 720 is that the 720 has a stainless steel face, making
    it a little more durable. It's getting harder to find the 710, so I suspect Polar is phasing it out.
    I bought the 720 last month and have 1406 miles on it so far. The only downside is that electrical
    interference can temporarily jam the wireless signal, showing 68 mph or 196 cadence. This doesn't
    happen very often, and it has little impact on the aggregate measurements.

    All of the functions (heart, speed, cadence) are wireless. If you buy the expensive power
    measurement option, all functions except heart rate are wired.
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA terrymorse.combike

  4. thanx, andy "Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    In article said:

    I am looking for a new HR monitor and am considering these cycling


    models.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Any reason to go w/ the 720 over the 710? Any problems w/ using it as a stand-alone cycling
    computer w/ cadence? Are all the functions except


    cadenc

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    wireless?

    The only difference between the 710 and the 720 is that the 720 has a stainless steel face, making
    it a little more durable. It's getting harder to find the 710, so I suspect Polar is phasing it
    out. I bought the 720 last month and have 1406 miles on it so far. The only downside is that
    electrical interference can temporarily jam the wireless signal, showing 68 mph or 196 cadence.
    This doesn't happen very often, and it has little impact on the aggregate measurements.

    All of the functions (heart, speed, cadence) are wireless. If you buy the expensive power
    measurement option, all functions except heart rate are wired.
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA terrymorse.combike

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.