General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Peter Moran is Angry, Still

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 3 posts · 319 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 December 2003
Last activity
30 December 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
319
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    Jan
    Archived post
    #1
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Jan Drew lies again From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden] Date: 12/29/2003 2:16 PM
    Central Standard Time Message-id: <3ff08ba5$0$825$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-
    01.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au>

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Alternative Med People From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden] Date: 12/28/2003 3:56
    PM Central Standard Time Message-id:

    <[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    PM > >The only place you will find any data is on his supporter's web site, and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that is uninterpretable very short term follow-up claiming a 65% remision rate with brain
    tumours already treated by other means.


    JD> Five year follow up.

    Jan lies!! Yet again she lies.

    Peter is showing his anger by lying while accusing others.

    Quoted message said:

    PM > >The only place you will find any data is on his supporter's web site, and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that is uninterpretable very short term follow-up claiming a 65% remision rate with brain
    tumours already treated by other means.

    Quoted message said:

    JD> Five year follow up.

    Jan lies!! Yet again she lies.

    Look at burzynskipatientgroup.orgcancernews.html

    Quoted message said:

    nd show me where five year follow-up is mentioned. They are even actually specified as phase 11
    studies which are very short term studies, usually of only a few months, designed to show if there
    is any anti-cancer effect at all. Why aren't we allowed to know how many of these patients


    are still

    Quoted message said:

    alive even a year later?

    Quoted message said:

    Burzinski sits back on his bum, gives no information on his web site, publishes nothing in either
    peer-reviewed journals or the "alternative" journals, and allows his supporters to quote figures
    giving the impression of a high cure rate becasue most people won't know how to


    interpret them.

    Quoted message said:

    I know that. he knows exactly what he is doing, even if Jan doesn't.

    Dr Burzynski has spent little time setting on his bum.

    Your efforts to trash him just shows more of organized medicine evils.

    I read it somewhere, I can't find it now.

    Yes do read this:

    Quoted message said:

    burzynskipatientgroup.orgcancernews.html

    Now show us the rates of success form conventional medicine.

    Is there any comparsion???

    Do show us Peter.

    Jan

    Report
  2. Mark Thorson
    Archived post
    #2
    Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath


    Lake,

    Quoted message said:

    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized asaddictive), and that
    Cell Tech

    ***deliberately**** avoids testing for this

    Quoted message said:

    toxin

    THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!

    Well, Jan, what exactly do the statements referred to by this statement say? What is the original
    statement which is a lie?

    You say that there is a lie in the file "An Anatoxin-A Primer". Let's see that lie. Post a
    WHOLE ORIGINAL STATEMENT from that file which is a lie. Not the whole file, just a statement
    which is a LIE.

    Certainly, you know where that part is, don't you Jan? Or do you just accuse people of being liars
    without regard to whether they've lied or not.

    Why don't you post this part, Jan? Then you'd prove that I'd lied, by posting the actual lie itself,
    rather than merely a statement that refers to the (alleged) lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see the Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that it, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

    Report
  3. D. C. Sessions
    Archived post
    #3

    This newsgroup is not about Peter Moran.

    --
    begin signature.exe
    A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
    B: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
    C: Top-posting.
    D: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionGeneral fitness, health and nutrition Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.