In article <[email hidden]>,
Jeff Starr said:What do you mean "I too". You and I have no idea why she hasn't
gotten it done. My guess is that it hasn't been convenient. And I
doubt that your reasons, are her reasons.
Some people have no interest in what they are accomplishing, they just
do what they do, and that's ok. Then, there are those of us who find
the info supplied by the cyclocomputer interesting and keep track of
it, another part of the total experience.
I've been on both sides of that. I prefer my current side. I've
got several years' worth of riding journal/log that I hardly ever
look at now. In retrospect my own cycloputer didn't do anything
for me that I couldn't have accomplished without it.
Quoted message said:I really like seeing the progress that I have made, both in speed and
distance. Being aware of my cadence has made me a better rider. It's
like a heart rate monitor, I use one for my rides and keep track of
the info. But, I wear it on my wrist, not mounted on the bars. I
seldom even look at it, during a ride. For me it is both a learning
tool and a way of monitoring my performance.
Hey, whatever works for you; that goes for anybody. But I'm not
gonna nag Maggie to install her cycloputer if she doesn't want to.
And I'm certainly not going to suggest to her that cycloputers
are essential. What has mostly contributed to improvement in my
own riding skills is just plain riding, and learning from others.
Quoted message said:If you can find anyone who has figured out how to ride a computer, I
would be interested. Mine doesn't have wheels, even my home PC, is not
rideable;-)
I find it interesting how the ride reports in r.b.rides
speak in terms of the experience of the ride -- the sights,
traffic, weather, road conditions etc, while in r.b.misc the
emphasis seems to be on numbers like annual milage, highest
speed attained, elevation gains or highest cadence. I'm not
finding fault with anything or criticizing anybody, it's just
interesting to note how the r.b.rides community seems to be
more appreciative of the qualitative, while the r.b.misc
community concentrates on the quantitative.
Besides, after one too many bunny hops, a cycloputer head will
go flying off its mount to be lost like a blinkie, anyways.
But life (and riding) will go on.
cheers,
Tom
--
-- "Who needs information, when you're working undergound"
-- Roger Waters, from his Radio KAOS album