Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Pant Question

Started by SniffinVinyl · · Last activity · 42 posts · 1,562 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
22 April 2004
Last activity
25 April 2004
Original author
SniffinVinyl
Posts
42
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,562
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 42
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Penny S said:
    Per Elmsäter said:
    Penny S said:

    Per Elmsäter wrote:
    > Penny S wrote:
    >>> Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out style) for
    >>> going to the baggy variety? (and I don't care about all the
    >>> little pockets, I have a camelback).
    >>>
    >> serveral.
    >>
    >> if you snag lycra on a twig and it rips, well... you have have an
    >> exposure situation. Baggies are more abrasion resistant, plus you
    >> have the liner underneath. The nylon fabric of baggies will also
    >> slide a little more, less likely to snag and tear, unless you
    >> catch a pocket or something.
    >>
    >> Penny
    >
    > I'm not so sure about that. I snagged my Lycra pretty bad on twig
    > last weekend. Results were not noticeable on the shorts but a 4
    > inch log scar is visible on my hip.
    > Roadie shorts are kindof made to not rip real easy and also to keep
    > you from getting real bad road rash when sliding on asphalt.

    OK, so I don't know what I"m talking about. I can live with that.

    Penny

    Hey don't take offense now 😉 We're not talking nylon stockings you
    know. Serioulsy. I've got three pair of Lycra shorts that I've
    treated pretty bad on both asphalt and offroad. None have the
    slightest wear or tear. The only telltale signs on them is that
    they've been through the washer hundreds of times maybe.

    not offended. I have three different weights of lycra shorts: heavy
    duty, made of 9 ounce, the same stuff pro foot ball leggins are made
    of, that are extremely tought. I have a one lighter pair, that
    haven't torn yet, and then I have a super light wicking lycra
    suppllex pair that are awesome because they are so cool to wear when
    it's really hot.. but they seem to snag on everything.

    as for pantyhose... I wouldn't know what you are talking about,
    haven't owned any for years.

    Penny

    I didn't say pantyhose. That is not in my vocabulary. Over here women wear
    nylon stockings when they dress up.
    Agreed though that Lycra of course comes in different quality. The best
    biking shorts I have are made by Briko.

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  2. mojo deluxe said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts. I don't want
    baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.

    well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some Cannondales with a
    built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave me, and I really like them. They
    aren't too baggy, just right. And they don't have elastic at the
    waist, or open pockets, I think thats where you'd get into trouble
    with the snags.


    I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon. I have to
    admit, that elastic at the waist can get annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to relieve yourself 😉

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  3. On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:14:25 GMT, "Per Elmsäter"
    <[email hidden]> scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    Hey don't take offense now 😉 We're not talking nylon stockings you know.
    Serioulsy. I've got three pair of Lycra shorts that I've treated pretty bad
    on both asphalt and offroad. None have the slightest wear or tear. The only
    telltale signs on them is that they've been through the washer hundreds of
    times maybe.

    I had a friend who had a high-speed rollerskiing incident, much
    skidding was involved. The lycra was fine (didn't even tear), but she
    was a bit scraped and bruised underneath. I'd imagine that had it been
    a different material the outcome could have been a bit more painful.
    Road rash is not fun!

    -Slash
    --
    "Ebert Victorious"
    -The Onion

  4. tcmedara said:

    True, lycra isn't the look for everyone. But this is a mountain bike
    group. Fashion is for roadies and "Queer Eye" afficionados.


    Being a roadie I have no choice but to agree on the first part of your
    statement. Before I go any further though I need to know what a "Queer Eye"
    afficionado is?

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  5. "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mojo deluxe wrote:
    > I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts. I don't want
    > baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.

    well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some Cannondales with a
    built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave me, and I really like them. They
    aren't too baggy, just right. And they don't have elastic at the
    waist, or open pockets, I think thats where you'd get into trouble
    with the snags.


    I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon. I have to
    admit, that elastic at the waist can get annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to relieve yourself


    😉

    Quoted message said:


    No way!

  6. ----------
    In article <[email hidden]>, "SniffinVinyl"

    Quoted message said:


    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out style) for going to the
    baggy variety?

    Fat ass

    Paul - modest

  7. ----------
    In article <[email hidden]>, "Paul

    macintyre said:

    ----------
    In article <[email hidden]>, "SniffinVinyl"

    Quoted message said:


    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out style) for going to the
    baggy variety?

    Fat ass

    Paul - modest

    As some one told Bubba once wearing spandex is a privilege not a right

  8. "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    SniffinVinyl said:

    I am getting back to my MTB after a few years away from the sport. Old
    shorts have expired elastics, so I need new ones.

    Looking thru bike store, they have all these baggy shorts with spandex


    inner

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    liners. They said they also have the regular spandex pants but they have
    kind of gone out of style.

    This makes no sense to me, I have ridden before with shorts over my


    regular

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    riding pants and it has driven my crazy. To me, spandex riding pants


    seem to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make the most sense.

    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out style) for going to


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    baggy variety? (and I don't care about all the little pockets, I have a
    camelback).

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small camera in a pocket.
    It makes it much more available for candid shots rather than having to get
    setup for a shot. I can even grab it and snap shots while riding.

    For storing things like that, I just stick them down he side of my lycras,
    next to the hip - stays where the hell I left it without trouble.

    Shaun aRe

  9. Per Elmsäter said:
    tcmedara said:

    True, lycra isn't the look for everyone. But this is a mountain bike
    group. Fashion is for roadies and "Queer Eye" afficionados.


    Being a roadie I have no choice but to agree on the first part of your
    statement. Before I go any further though I need to know what a
    "Queer Eye" afficionado is?

    http://www.bravotv.com/Queer_Eye_for_the_Straight_Guy/

  10. G.T. said:


    I just stick it in the pocket. My original Olympus Stylus from 1991
    survived tons of stuff so I'm treating my A70 the same way. I may be
    too trusting but the A70 feels pretty solid.

    Quoted message said:

    I was checking out these stretchy neoprene cases the other day,
    http://ww3.onecall.com/PID_23511.htm

    I'd be a little worried about the camera in pocket getting whacked
    against something.

    I've ridden with my A70 a handful of times now and dropped it once.
    I've already lost the bexel around the lens, it appears to just be
    cosmetic, and the door to the compact flash is kind of
    discombobulated. The only thing I'm worried about is the lcd getting
    too scratched up over time. Even the pathetic little viewfinder on
    my Olympus is 20 times better than the viewfinder on the A70 so the
    lcd is pretty important.

    Personally I don't want to get a case because I like to be able to
    shoot quickly so I can take pictures of someone who may be close
    behind without asking them to stop, seconds count in that scenario.
    And a lot of my solo photos are taken while riding, I don't have to
    stop and get the camera out of the case.

    Greg

    hmmmm. I've got an A70 also, and it seems like one tough little camera. I
    dropped mine on the cement floor of the garage the other day, and my first
    thought was, oh... [censored]. My Nikon Coolpix did not survive a similar drop
    onto something soft ( roof insulation). I didn't even notice that the case
    had a dent in it until I took the camera in to get the lens cleaned. The
    guy freaked and suggested I check my prints carefully for any focus
    mis-alignment. So... alls well!!

    I'm still thinking of one of those little neoprene cased like I linked to,
    for my camel back strap. Mostly I'm in pocketless lycra shorts.

    penny

  11. Penny S said:

    I didn't even notice that the case had a dent in it until I took the
    camera in to get the lens cleaned.

    Whassamatta, a t-shirt and thumb swirl ain't good enough for ya?!?

    Bill "blur" S.

  12. "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "G.T." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    SniffinVinyl said:

    I am getting back to my MTB after a few years away from the sport. Old
    shorts have expired elastics, so I need new ones.

    Looking thru bike store, they have all these baggy shorts with spandex


    inner

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    liners. They said they also have the regular spandex pants but they


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    kind of gone out of style.

    This makes no sense to me, I have ridden before with shorts over my


    regular

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    riding pants and it has driven my crazy. To me, spandex riding pants


    seem to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make the most sense.

    Can anyone offer a technical reason (which rules out style) for going


    to

    Quoted message said:

    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    baggy variety? (and I don't care about all the little pockets, I have


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    camelback).

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small camera in a pocket.
    It makes it much more available for candid shots rather than having to


    get

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    setup for a shot. I can even grab it and snap shots while riding.

    For storing things like that, I just stick them down he side of my lycras,
    next to the hip - stays where the hell I left it without trouble.

    I do for Clif bars and stuff but the camera is too heavy.

    Greg

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,

    G.T. said:

    SniffinVinyl wrote:

    [sniffin baggy shorts]

    Quoted message said:

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small camera in a pocket.

    Isn't that what jersey pockets are for?
    Or are cycling jerseys taboo as well?

    Eric

  14. Eric Murray said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    G.T. said:

    SniffinVinyl wrote:

    [sniffin baggy shorts]

    Quoted message said:

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small camera in a
    pocket.

    Isn't that what jersey pockets are for?
    Or are cycling jerseys taboo as well?

    Eric

    Camel backs generally close off the top of the pocket, or rest on top of
    them.mamkeing putting stuff in there impractical. I know I use a pack in
    lieu of pockets, I generally use pocketless tops.

    penny

  15. mojo deluxe said:

    "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > mojo deluxe wrote:
    >> I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts. I don't want
    >> baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.
    >
    >
    > well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some Cannondales with
    > a built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave me, and I really like them.
    > They aren't too baggy, just right. And they don't have elastic at
    > the waist, or open pockets, I think thats where you'd get into
    > trouble with the snags.
    >
    I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon. I have to
    admit, that elastic at the waist can get annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to relieve
    yourself 😉


    No way!

    No, not like the dogs do it. I meant one leg of the bibs 😉
    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  16. Penny S said:
    Per Elmsäter said:
    tcmedara said:

    True, lycra isn't the look for everyone. But this is a mountain
    bike group. Fashion is for roadies and "Queer Eye" afficionados.


    Being a roadie I have no choice but to agree on the first part of
    your statement. Before I go any further though I need to know what a
    "Queer Eye" afficionado is?

    http://www.bravotv.com/Queer_Eye_for_the_Straight_Guy/

    Absolutely awesome

    Quote
    "They are the Fab Five: an elite team of gay men dedicated to extolling the
    simple virtues of style, taste and class.
    Each week their mission is to transform a style-deficient and
    culture-deprived straight man from drab to fab in each of their respective
    categories: fashion, food & wine, interior design, grooming and culture. "
    End quote

    Being a roadie I'm safe, which means I'm neither style-deficient nor
    culture-deprived. The rest of you however better watch out for the Fab Five
    ROTFL

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  17. Eric Murray said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    G.T. said:

    SniffinVinyl wrote:

    [sniffin baggy shorts]

    Quoted message said:

    The only reason I wear them is so I can put my small camera in a pocket.

    Isn't that what jersey pockets are for?
    Or are cycling jerseys taboo as well?

    Jersey pockets aren't as easy to reach as pants pockets, they don't have a
    flap, and they're particularly hard to reach with a Camelback on.

    Greg

  18. "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    mojo deluxe said:

    "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mojo deluxe wrote:
    > "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> mojo deluxe wrote:
    >>> I would use nothing other than lycra/spandex shorts. I don't want
    >>> baggy shorts snagging on my saddle.
    >>
    >>
    >> well now, I have my first pair of baggies... some Cannondales with
    >> a built in liner that Tuffgrrl gave me, and I really like them.
    >> They aren't too baggy, just right. And they don't have elastic at
    >> the waist, or open pockets, I think thats where you'd get into
    >> trouble with the snags.
    >>
    > I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon. I have to
    > admit, that elastic at the waist can get annoying.

    Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to relieve
    yourself 😉


    No way!

    No, not like the dogs do it. I meant one leg of the bibs 😉

    Does it work for the ladies as well?

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  19. ZeeExSixAre said:

    "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> I will be trying my first pair of bib shorts real soon. I have to
    >> admit, that elastic at the waist can get annoying.
    >
    > Bibs are nice once you get used to rolling up one leg to relieve
    > yourself 😉
    >
    No way!

    No, not like the dogs do it. I meant one leg of the bibs 😉

    Does it work for the ladies as well?

    most gals dont have to wear bib shorts to keep their pants up over their
    gut. I did have a dancer friend show me a very interesting trick involving
    tights worn under leotards once...

    penny

  20. Penny S said:

    OK, so I don't know what I"m talking about. I can live with that.

    I take everything back. I ripped my Lycra bibs real bad today when I fell on
    a splintered stump sticking out of the ground.
    It was like
    - Knock, knock.
    - Who's there?
    - Madame.
    - Madame who?
    - My damn shoe's caught in the pedal. Topple, topple and slowly over. OUCH

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.