Skip said:
Tom's comments are right-on the money. I really don't have much more to add.
It if really, positively, has to be gone in a week, my only suggestion is the old idea of nailing
paper-plates with arrows drawn on them to fenceposts and then taking them down later.
In some areas, posting signs within the highway right of way is illegal. Certainly, such signs are
more likely to be gone by the time a rider needs them - either due to wind, or due to adjoining
landowners removing them. Besides, with signs, it's likely to be quite difficult to duplicate the
common practice (at least for our club) of an advance warning, two marks just before the turn, and
one "confirmation" mark after the turn. I'd stick with the road markings.
Quoted message said:As for conflicts with the authorities -- it doesn't matter how many (few) square-inches you are
painting. I've found that it helps if you can show them that your are using chalk.
I think this is another situation where the letter of the law may be more strict than any practical
application needs to be. For the area Skip discusses - north of Pittsburgh - I've been on rides
organized by clubs, and as I recall, the roads were marked in the standard way: paint on the roads.
The marks are tiny enough that there can be no _practical_ objection. The odds on getting stopped by
police while doing it are small indeed, in my experience. Granted, there could be a bike-hating cop
who decided to make your life miserable, but our club has never come across such a thing.
In such a case, I'd think an appeal to superiors, mentioning the safety needs of the riders, would
get quick relief.
--
Frank Krygowski [email hidden]