Seen elsewhere:
Apparently the latest evidence is considered conclusive:
<http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html?nasa>
James
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
UK and Europe · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Seen elsewhere:
Apparently the latest evidence is considered conclusive:
<http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html?nasa>
James
James Annan said:Seen elsewhere:
Apparently the latest evidence is considered conclusive:
You then need to navigate backwards to yesterday's picture.
--
Cheerful Pedalling
John Mallard
John Mallard said:James Annan said:Seen elsewhere:
Apparently the latest evidence is considered conclusive:
You then need to navigate backwards to yesterday's picture.
Cheers! With my cosmological knowledge a wee bit limited I was
struggling to find evidence of water on Mars from all that black holey
stuff.
--
Brian G
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 08:46:13 +0100, "John Mallard" <not_me@all> wrote
in message <[email hidden]>:
Quoted message said:You then need to navigate backwards to yesterday's picture.
Or go straight here: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050401.html
It's clearly genuine, unlike the photos of Neil Armstrong on the moon
which are of course blatant fakes.
Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
"To every complex problem there is a solution which is
simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.