Road Cycling · Public discussion

OT: refueling OPEC

Started by Ken · · Last activity · 1 post · 299 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
8 April 2005
Last activity
8 April 2005
Original author
Ken
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
299
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Refueling OPEC

    By Charles Komanoff and Michael J. Smith
    (Published in The Washington Post, February 23, 2000)

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----

    For the first time in almost 10 years, crude oil prices have risen above $30
    a barrel. Heating oil, a vital fuel in the Northeast, is at $2 a gallon,
    double the price of a year ago, and gasoline could top $1.75 by summer.
    What's going on?

    The simple answer is that for the past six months, the member nations of
    OPEC have constricted supply by several million barrels a day. Inventories
    are shrinking fast and sellers have the whip hand.

    But that's only half the picture. The oil equation has a demand side as
    well, although we prefer to ignore it. Supply is sexy and subject to
    exciting quick fixes, such as draining the strategic petroleum reserve or
    sending soldiers to tap the barrel with bayonets. Demand appears, at first
    glance, less tractable; it is the sum of small actions by millions of
    drivers and householders.

    But these individual choices are shaped by how our vehicles are engineered
    and how our destinations are scattered across the landscape. Demand is a
    thing that policy has created, and it is something policy can change, though
    not overnight. It is undeniably a disagreeable subject, however, because to
    look closely at it is to confront some unpleasant realities about the
    "American dream."

    The great economic expansion of the '90 was, metaphorically, built on boxes.
    The box that grabbed all the attention was the personal computer. But other,
    bigger boxes played their part as well.

    The big box on wheels - the sport utility vehicle - pumped an infusion of
    cash into the American car industry. The big-box stores sweetened the profit
    margins of the retail sector. And with these two came yet another wave of
    suburbanization, this one strewing millions of new big-box houses around the
    outer metropolitan fringe. And these big houses have big, fuel-guzzling
    furnaces.

    Driving all those big vehicles back and forth between home and shopping and
    work takes a lot of gasoline. In just 10 years, from 1990 to today, U.S.
    gasoline consumption jumped by 25 percent, or well over 2 million barrels a
    day. Half the increase is because we're traveling farther, and the other
    half is because SUVs and other "light trucks" are exempt from car
    fuel-economy standards.

    The combination has contributed as much to the supply-demand imbalance as
    the OPEC cutback has. In fact, it is our drunkard's thirst for gasoline,
    more than any other single thing, that gave OPEC its opportunity. Unlike
    other oil producers, the OPEC nations have considerable spare production
    capacity; thus, when demand increases, their share increases more rapidly.

    Last year, for the first time since the Gulf War, the cartel's share of
    world production approached 45 percent, the level it has traditionally
    needed for market dominance. U.S. motorists have put OPEC back in the
    driver's seat.

    Is there a happy ending? It depends. In one scenario, the price of crude
    settles at $30 a barrel, and consumers learn to live with it. Once stability
    returns to oil markets and the opportunity for speculation and price gouging
    is eliminated, gasoline and heating oil should settle at around $1.50 a
    gallon - a new high but still affordable for the politically crucial middle
    class. Prices at this level might promote somewhat less wasteful patterns of
    use.

    Or, OPEC could fracture again. Just a few member states cheating on their
    quotas would be enough to reverse market psychology and send prices
    plunging. Our decades-long oil-fueled booze-up could then continue a while
    longer, with predictable consequences for our social health.

    We haven't quite reached the point of delirium tremens - yet. But the
    headaches we've had over the last few weeks are trying to tell us something.
    A lifestyle based on the hugely disproportionate consumption of oil will
    take its toll; and all our big boxes will sooner or later put us in a very
    uncomfortable box indeed.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----

    Okay I have too much time on my hands today. But I thought it was
    interesting, kind of goes along with "Bicycles and the cost of gas." Oh yeah
    and I found this on http://cars-suck.org/ if you want to read more of their
    thinking.

    Ken
    --
    Remove "-dispose-trash" for email address
    My personal webstie: http://kcm-home.tripod.com/
    My blog: http://mind-dribble.blogspot.com/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.