Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

OT: More Arab "journalism"

Started by Robert Siegel · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,510 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
3 April 2003
Last activity
4 April 2003
Original author
Robert Siegel
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,510
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This is purely FYI .... if you care for a few facts ...

    --
    Gator Bob Siegel EasyRacers Ti Rush

    ******

    Arab TV Serves As Iraq's Link to World Mar 30, 9:51 AM EST

    After Iraqi television was knocked off the air by U.S. missiles, Iraqi officials were on the screen
    hours later, defiantly denouncing both the attacks and the American and British forces in Iraq.

    When bombs exploded at the Iraqi Information Ministry on Saturday, pictures were broadcast live all
    over the world.

    In both cases, Iraqis used Arab satellite television stations to tell their side of the war to the
    world - primarily to Arab viewers - despite the bombardment of their capital.

    The situation is entirely different from the Gulf War in 1991. Then CNN was the pre-eminent
    television station, showing dramatic pictures of incoming and outgoing missiles in Kuwait, Iraq or
    Israel, and of reporters donning gas masks on camera.

    This time, CNN's team has been expelled and most American television outlets have gone too. Some
    Western networks are showing scenes from Baghdad that come from Arab stations like the Qatar-based
    al-Jazeera, Dubai-based al-Arabiya, Abu Dhabi Television in the United Arabs Emirates and the
    Lebanese Broadcasting Corp.

    On their own channels, the Arab stations have repeatedly aired footage of dead Iraqi civilians, the
    bloodied faces of wounded children and the outpouring of grief - and outrage - at funerals. They
    also broadcast pictures of American prisoners of war, equipment seized or destroyed by the Iraqis,
    and angry demonstrations across the Arab world.

    "We hope to succeed in presenting the most accurate and objective picture," Maher Abdullah, a
    reporter with al-Jazeera, said Sunday while reporting from Baghdad. "We are keen on objectivity, but
    not necessarily neutrality."

    Opposition Iraqi Kurds, who have their own television station, have complained of biased coverage
    from Arab TV stations.

    A group of university professors and the Kurdistan Journalists Union charged in a statement read on
    Kurdish television that Arab satellite stations were biased in favor of the Iraqi regime and
    "deliberately obscure and distort facts."

    Arab media outlets rarely challenge popular Arab opinion on such subjects as Israel and the United
    States. In this war, U.S. and British battlefield losses and setbacks are highlighted, while Iraqi
    military casualties are not mentioned.

    One Arab analyst, interviewed on the most popular Arabic satellite station, al-Jazeera, described
    British soldiers as unmotivated men who join the army just for "muscle-building and adventures."

    Another Arab analyst boasted on TV that the pace of Iraqi attacks was so rapid that Baghdad's
    treasury was risking bankruptcy because of President Saddam Hussein's decision to give money to
    anyone who shot down a plane or captured an American or British POW.

    Still, the importance of an Arab voice catering to an Arab viewers has not been missed by the
    American government. Secretary of State Colin Powell and other government and military officials
    have appeared on Arabic television channels in interviews that carried on-air Arabic translation.

    Iraq also has sought to capitalize on the popularity of Arab TV stations, giving them preference
    over the regime's own satellite television.

    In the Middle East, views vary from praise to caution.

    "We are lucky to have these Arabic channels, because during the last war we were watching only
    CNN, so we couldn't know the whole truth," said Hamza al-Ghazawi, a shop owner in the Jordanian
    capital of Amman.

    "They show both points of view, while CNN focuses on the American point of view," the
    25-year-old said.

    In Lebanon, Palestinian guerrilla Mutieh Abulail in the refugee camp of Ein el-Hilweh said he
    watches Arab stations "because they stand on Iraq's side. They are transmitting the truth with
    pictures and can greatly influence the public opinion in Iraq's favor."

    Hemoud al-Hemoud, a retired Jordanian government employee, complained about exaggeration by the Arab
    stations, but said their coverage appears to have had an effect on their Western counterparts.

    "I find CNN more accurate than it was in the 1991 Gulf War on Iraq," said the 60-year-old al-Hemoud.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    This time, CNN's team has been expelled and most American television outlets have gone too. Some
    Western networks are showing scenes from Baghdad that come from Arab stations like the Qatar-based
    al-Jazeera, Dubai-based al-Arabiya, Abu Dhabi Television in the United Arabs Emirates and the
    Lebanese Broadcasting Corp.

    On their own channels, the Arab stations have repeatedly aired footage of dead Iraqi civilians,
    the bloodied faces of wounded children and the outpouring of grief - and outrage - at funerals.
    They also broadcast pictures of American prisoners of war, equipment seized or destroyed by the
    Iraqis, and angry demonstrations across the Arab world.


    You might want to balance you US TV Biased reporting with these web sites:

    news.bbc.co.uknews.bbc.co.uk arabnews.comarabnews.com At least you will get a different bias and can beging
    to ferret out the 'real' truth from all the sensationalizm being hyped by all sides

    And FWIW, if you dig deep enough you will find the Iraq has expelled Several Al-Jeezera journaist
    and that Al-Jeezera has halted its Iraq broadcasts in protest.

    news.bbc.co.uk2911935.stm

    --

    Cletus D. Lee Bacchetta Giro Lightning Voyager clee.orgclee.org
    - Bellaire, TX USA -

  3. I read and listen to them all, Cletus. Today I watched an Al Jazeera newsreader lob softballs at
    the Iraqi #2 or #3 guy. The Al Jazeera patsy never once challenged the Iraqi's painfully obvious
    lies with a single follow up question. It was always "all right" and then on to the next softball
    question. In my 15 years as an investigative reporter and editor, I developed a pretty good
    bullsh*t detector.

    --
    Gator Bob Siegel EasyRacers Ti Rush "Cletus Lee" <[email hidden]> wrote.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    You might want to balance you US TV Biased reporting with these web sites:

    news.bbc.co.uknews.bbc.co.uk arabnews.comarabnews.com At least you will get a different bias and can
    begging to ferret out the


    'real' truth from all

    Quoted message said:

    the sensationalism being hyped by all sides

    And FWIW, if you dig deep enough you will find the Iraq has expelled


    Several Al-Jeezera

    Quoted message said:

    journalist and that Al-Jeezera has halted its Iraq broadcasts in protest.

  4. "Robert Siegel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I read and listen to them all, Cletus. Today I watched an Al Jazeera newsreader lob softballs at
    the Iraqi #2 or #3 guy. The Al Jazeera patsy never once challenged the Iraqi's painfully obvious
    lies with a single follow up question. It was always "all right" and then on to the next softball
    question. In my 15 years as an investigative reporter and


    editor,

    Quoted message said:

    I developed a pretty good bullsh*t detector.

    --
    Gator Bob Siegel EasyRacers Ti Rush "Cletus Lee" <[email hidden]> wrote.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I aggree with your assessment of al-jazeera's questioner, Bob, but how is it different from dubya's
    or Cheney's press conferences? neither of them will directly answer a question- they just redirect
    and obfuscate. and the lap dogs in the white house press corps just roll over when dubya calls them
    by thier nickname.

    here are some of my current news sources:

    ny times krugman (wsj) molly ivins the economist bbc world news christian science monitor the nation
    ha'aretz (english version, natch) harper's atlantic cursor.com tom toles (for grins & giggles) roger
    friedman salon.com

    rich v2

  5. We agree that the art of ducking questions has been well honed. But a good reporter will be a
    persistent pain in th *ss and wilkl have done enough homework so his follow-on question at least
    clearlty demonstrates that his target is in fact ducking the question.

    See the Wall Street Journal's lead page one article/analysis this morning
    (4/4) documenting how Al Jazeera focuses almost exclusively on Arab victims of this war.

    --
    Gator Bob Siegel EasyRacers Ti Rush "Rich Westerman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Robert Siegel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I read and listen to them all, Cletus. Today I watched an Al Jazeera newsreader lob softballs at
    the Iraqi #2 or #3 guy. The Al Jazeera patsy never once challenged the Iraqi's painfully obvious
    lies with a single follow up question. It was always "all right" and then on to the next
    softball question. In my 15 years as an investigative reporter and


    editor,

    Quoted message said:

    I developed a pretty good bullsh*t detector.

    --
    Gator Bob Siegel EasyRacers Ti Rush "Cletus Lee" <[email hidden]> wrote.

    Quoted message said:

    >

    I aggree with your assessment of al-jazeera's questioner, Bob, but how is


    it

    Quoted message said:

    different from dubya's or Cheney's press conferences? neither of them


    will

    Quoted message said:

    directly answer a question- they just redirect and obfuscate. and the lap dogs in the white house
    press corps just roll over when dubya calls them


    by

    Quoted message said:

    thier nickname.

    here are some of my current news sources:

    ny times krugman (wsj) molly ivins the economist bbc world news christian science monitor the
    nation ha'aretz (english version, natch) harper's atlantic cursor.com tom toles (for grins &
    giggles) roger friedman salon.com

    rich v2

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.