General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

OT: Controlling Dangerous Assault Journalists

Started by WillBrink · · Last activity · 2 posts · 229 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
22 June 2005
Last activity
22 June 2005
Original author
WillBrink
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
229
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Time to Control Dangerous Assault Journalists
    By Alan Gottlieb

    Seventeen confirmed dead and hundreds injured. This was not the work of
    some stereotypical lunatic with a gun, but the handiwork of a careless
    reporter who must have graduated from the Dan Rather School of
    investigative journalism.

    Now that Newsweek has lived up to the high standard of prevarication
    established by Jayson Blair at the New York Times and by Janet Cooke at
    Newsweek's parent company, the Washington Post, maybe it's time to
    establish the kind of ground rules for reporters that the anti-gun press
    has advocated for American gun owners, who never lied, or caused harm to
    anybody.

    Why isn't Sarah Brady screaming for a clampdown on "assault journalism?"
    Why can't we demand some "common sense" controls on out-of-control
    reporters who go off half-cocked faster than a broken musket?

    Where's Chuck Schumer? He's good at dancing in the blood of gunshot
    victims to push his gun control agenda. Why isn't he just as eager to
    capitalize on the mayhem of riots that resulted from Newsweek's bogus
    story about the Guantanamo Bay flush that never happened? Schumer's
    never been one to hide from media exposure. This is the first time he's
    missed the opportunity to trample his way to the television camera.

    With tongue-in-cheek, let's apply the same logic to exercising the First
    Amendment that the mainstream press has accepted as reasonable when
    applied to those exercising the Second Amendment. It might be shocking
    to members of the press just how eagerly American firearms owners would
    seriously embrace this concept of karma.

    Henceforth, the First Amendment will be interpreted to apply only to
    state-owned newspapers. When the First Amendment was written, nobody
    envisioned computers, high speed presses, and the internet or television
    and radio news. There is no individual right to become a reporter,
    especially a freelance journalist. Only reporters employed by
    state-owned print media outlets have a legitimate reason to own laptops
    or personal home computers.

    Journalists should be registered and required to pass a course in safe
    news writing before they can own, or have access to, a keyboard. They
    should need a special permit to carry a notebook and pen, and a
    mandatory background check before carrying a concealed tape recorder or
    hidden camera.

    Newsmen should be limited to stories containing no more than ten
    paragraphs. All small one- or two-paragraph news shorts, like the one in
    Newsweek that caused all the trouble, should be banned because they are
    so easily hidden within larger news columns.

    America must stop importing foreign news, because it might be dangerous
    if it fell into the wrong hands. If news is not clearly sports-related,
    the average American should not be allowed to read it or listen to it.

    All personal computers, laptops and word processors must be registered
    because of their ability to rapid-fire words into print and onto the
    internet indiscriminately. Journalists who currently own computers will
    be able to keep them, but they won't be able to sell them to other
    reporters unless the buyers go through federally-licensed computer
    retailers, and pass a background check to make sure they haven't libeled
    anyone or ever filed an erroneous story.

    "Civilian journalists" don't need laptops or personal computers. Manual
    typewriters are acceptable because of their slower rate of word
    production. Before a journalist can possess a typewriter he or she
    purchases, they must submit to a mandatory background check that can
    take up to three days.

    If a reporter carelessly writes a story that falls into the wrong hands
    and causes the death of another person, that reporter should face
    criminal prosecution.

    Reporters may not carry notebooks, tape recorders, typewriters or
    laptops aboard commercial aircraft. All such devices must be transported
    in checked baggage.

    All news must be delayed from broadcast or print for a period of three
    days, allowing time for reporters and editors to "cool off."

    Journalists would come unhinged if such measures were ever seriously
    considered, much less enacted. But this is exactly the kind of legal
    mine field through which gun owners must now tread; a regulatory
    nightmare the press has endorsed.

    Newsweek's carelessness has killed more people than any law-abiding gun
    owner, outside of battlefield service in the armed forces.

    What's good for gun owners should also be good for the press.
    Considering recent events, to argue otherwise is monumental hypocrisy.

    From: the Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org)

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    WillBrink said:


    Time to Control Dangerous Assault Journalists
    By Alan Gottlieb


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:


    Why isn't Sarah Brady screaming for a clampdown on "assault journalism?"


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:


    Where's Chuck Schumer? He's good at dancing in the blood of gunshot
    victims to push his gun control agenda. Why isn't he just as eager to
    capitalize on the mayhem of riots that resulted from Newsweek's bogus
    story about the Guantanamo Bay flush that never happened? Schumer's
    never been one to hide from media exposure. This is the first time he's
    missed the opportunity to trample his way to the television camera.


    [snip]

    Oh, the answer to *those* is simple: Brady, Schumer, etc. *dare* not
    criticize The Press for its misdeeds. The Press is largely
    left-"liberal"-leaning. Left-"liberal" politicians absolutely cannot
    afford to lose that ally.

    --
    Jim Seymour | "It is wrong always, everywhere and
    WARNING: The "From:" address is a | for everyone to believe anything upon
    spam trap. DON'T USE IT! Use: | insufficient evidence."
    [email hidden] | - W. K. Clifford, ca. 1876

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.