OT - Boxing Day

Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:46:20 -0000
I overheard Paul Saunders <[email hidden]>
state in <news:[email hidden]>:

<snp>

Quoted message said:

You don't, they do. There's no accounting for taste, and that applies to
everything.

Indeed. Nowt as weird as folk.

--
There are no facts, only interpretations.
{Friedrich Nietzsche}

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Doing very well hereabouts. I see them almost nightly. I got to watch
cubs in June, playing in a strawberry field. Pics were dismal though.

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Probably not...

Quoted message said:

I wonder if these good people in here are aware of your antics?

.... and I wonder if we would be bothered by them if he were the same
person that you're talking about. Have you just come here to cause
trouble? 'Cos if so, please go away again.

--
To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
where common sense dictates.

In message <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Doing very well hereabouts. I see them almost nightly. I got to watch
cubs in June, playing in a strawberry field. Pics were dismal though.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Quoted message said:

Probably not...

Unfortunately and unequivocally YES. No need to apologise for
your naivety madam.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I wonder if these good people in here are aware of your antics?

Quoted message said:

... and I wonder if we would be bothered by them if he were the same
person that you're talking about. Have you just come here to cause
trouble? 'Cos if so, please go away again.

I politely suggest you take your head out of your [censored], waken
up and smell the coffee.

He started off on demon.local exactly as he did here. I suggest you read
back on demon.local and see what transpired over a period of two years.

No, I'm not here to cause anything, merely to warn what appears to
be an ng populated on the whole by decent people of what Paul Rooney
and his 'friends' Phil Kyle and Parsnip are capable of. I'm sure you've
heard of these two unsavoury specimens.

I defy you to read what they have been attempting to do in numerous
ng's and not be disgusted. Their sole aim is initially the flooding
of ng's in the hope of making them unreadable, and eventually forcing
them to close down. Demon.local moved to a web based system in order
not to have to read the puerile [censored] spouted by 'your' Paul Rooney
and his two sociopathic cohorts.

You have been warned.

Best regards.

--
JK.

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Doing very well hereabouts. I see them almost nightly. I got to watch
cubs in June, playing in a strawberry field. Pics were dismal though.

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Probably not...

Oh, it is. I assure you - the very same lying scouse [censored].

--
Neil Barker

Judith said:

Quoted message said:

Well, an even playing is definitely called for:

Give the dogs a day off and the miscreant should be chased by the
normally horse-borne throng, 'cept they should be a pied :-)

^^^^^^^^^

IRTA "pie-eyed" but it still made good sense.

<g> even after I, inadvertently, missed out /field/ you still
understood!!

:-)

I'll refrain from....

--
SteveO

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Doing very well hereabouts. I see them almost nightly. I got to watch
cubs in June, playing in a strawberry field. Pics were dismal though.

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Probably not...

Oh he is, I've just seen a post from the widow of the person who's death
Rooney has taken the [censored] out of. She speaks very openly of the distress
he has caused her.
--
Craig Oldfield

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

I politely suggest you take your head out of your [censored], waken
up and smell the coffee.

Polite!!! - you don't know the meaning of the word.
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

In message <[email hidden]>, W. D. Grey
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I politely suggest you take your head out of your [censored], waken
up and smell the coffee.

Quoted message said:

Polite!!! - you don't know the meaning of the word.

The lady needs to waken up pretty quickly as to what may happen
in your ng when Rooney's 'friends' descend.

As for being polite, please take a look at Rooney's posts in
demon.local. The indecency of them beggars belief.

My transgression pales to insignificance against those.

--
JK.

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, W. D. Grey
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I politely suggest you take your head out of your [censored], waken
up and smell the coffee.

Quoted message said:

Polite!!! - you don't know the meaning of the word.

The lady needs to waken up pretty quickly as to what may happen
in your ng when Rooney's 'friends' descend.

As for being polite, please take a look at Rooney's posts in
demon.local. The indecency of them beggars belief.

My transgression pales to insignificance against those.

At least you accept you transgressed - that's a start. Don't bother
quoting others to cover your own failings.
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

In message <[email hidden]>, W. D. Grey
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

The lady needs to waken up pretty quickly as to what may happen
in your ng when Rooney's 'friends' descend.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

As for being polite, please take a look at Rooney's posts in
demon.local. The indecency of them beggars belief.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

My transgression pales to insignificance against those.

Quoted message said:

At least you accept you transgressed - that's a start. Don't bother
quoting others to cover your own failings.

I suggest you look at what this piece of scum called Rooney
is responsible for before you start preaching at me.

That is of course assuming your mind can stretch beyond blind
loyalty.

--
JK.

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, W. D. Grey
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

>I politely suggest you take your head out of your [censored], waken
>up and smell the coffee.

Quoted message said:

Polite!!! - you don't know the meaning of the word.

The lady needs to waken up pretty quickly as to what may happen
in your ng when Rooney's 'friends' descend.

As for being polite, please take a look at Rooney's posts in
demon.local. The indecency of them beggars belief.

My transgression pales to insignificance against those.

At least you accept you transgressed - that's a start. Don't bother
quoting others to cover your own failings.

Have you considered asking Rooney why people are making the claims about
his offensive and distressing sig to the recently bereaved? Easy way of
checking if what is being said about him is correct.
--
Craig Oldfield

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:17:53 -0000, in
<[email hidden]> (uk.rec.walking) Fran

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Probably not...

I'm sure JK would be happy to admit that he can, on occasion, be a tad
abrasive. That does not, however, detract from the fact that what he
says here is demonstrably true.

Clearly, it is up to you to make of it what you will. For my part, I
am only keen that Mr Rooney should not be afforded the opportunity to
pretend that, as well as cooing over cubs, he is not also prepared
cheerfully to mock the deceased in the face of those who love them.

Quoted message said:

... and I wonder if we would be bothered by them if he were the same
person that you're talking about.

He is the same person and, like JK and others, I felt you probably
ought to know. Whether or not such things bother you is entirely up
to you, of course.

Quoted message said:

Have you just come here to cause
trouble? 'Cos if so, please go away again.

I can't speak for JK, but I'm not here to cause trouble and, because
most of the rec.walking that I do is not in the uk., I will probably
be going away anyway.
--
Charlie

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

I suggest you look at what this piece of scum called Rooney
is responsible for before you start preaching at me.

That is of course assuming your mind can stretch beyond blind
loyalty.

I have no favourites so loyalty is not problem .

By the way - BANG you're dead.
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Doing very well hereabouts. I see them almost nightly. I got to watch
cubs in June, playing in a strawberry field. Pics were dismal though.

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Probably not...

He uses the same domain.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I wonder if these good people in here are aware of your antics?

... and I wonder if we would be bothered by them if he were the same
person that you're talking about. Have you just come here to cause
trouble? 'Cos if so, please go away again.

Another one who thinks he's anonymous and can be brave while cowering
behind his keyboard 🙁

--
Do unto others....
mark horsman

In article <MPG.1e1f09d2e3d72f87989a91@localhost>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Rooney
<[email hidden]> writes

>Doing very well hereabouts. I see them almost nightly. I got to watch
>cubs in June, playing in a strawberry field. Pics were dismal though.

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Probably not...

Oh he is, I've just seen a post from the widow of the person who's death
Rooney has taken the [censored] out of. She speaks very openly of the distress
he has caused her.

His sort of foul ilk seem to be expert at beating up on vulnerable women
🙁

--
Do unto others....
mark horsman

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, JK. <[email hidden]>
writes

Quoted message said:

I suggest you look at what this piece of scum called Rooney
is responsible for before you start preaching at me.

That is of course assuming your mind can stretch beyond blind
loyalty.

I have no favourites so loyalty is not problem .

By the way - BANG you're dead.

Lol - the man's deranged.

--
Neil Barker

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

... and I wonder if we would be bothered by them if he were the same
person that you're talking about. Have you just come here to cause
trouble? 'Cos if so, please go away again.

Another one who thinks he's anonymous and can be brave while cowering
behind his keyboard 🙁

Who, me? I'm scarcely anonymous, and neither am I a 'he'.
--
To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
where common sense dictates.

In message <[email hidden]>, Tim Jones
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

Geoff Berrow said:

Message-ID: <[email hidden]> from Michael Hobby
contained the following:

Quoted message said:

Resources can be put to far better use (catching REAL criminals) than
"policing" this spurious legislation.

What is spurious about it? It's the law and has been passed in the same
way as any other law. I was pretty [censored] the other day because I got
done for no tax (slipped my mind what with Christmas and all),
especially as I knew I'd have to pay from the beginning of December
anyway, but the law is the law. And besides, not all law is criminal
law.

As a responsible walker I try to take nothing but photographs and leave
nothing but footprints. I delight in the serenity and the occasional
glimpse of the native wildlife but draw the line at a bunch of toffs
with more money than sense thrashing across the countryside in fancy
dress. In fact I had a perfectly good walk ruined yesterday by the
sound of [censored] shotguns.

Firstly shutguns don't [censored]. Secondly try showing a bit of tolerance
towards the hobbies of others. I found the sound of shooting an
annoyance yesterday, but why should I begrudge others their hobbies
and pastimes?

I trust that includes not begrudging the pastime of knocking over grouse
butts and rendering animal and crow traps useless with the aid of wire
cutters?

--
Martin Richardson
271/284 Munros - 4.5% to go 34/34 'Furths'- 0% to go
53/89 Donalds - 40% to go 493/1554 Marilyns - 67% to go
376/525 Hewitts - 28% to go (E=178/178; W=137/137; I=61/211)

Charlie King <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:17:53 -0000, in
<[email hidden]> (uk.rec.walking) Fran

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Couldn't care less, he's transformed the Manchester United attack.
Did you see them against Bolton today?
--
Gordon Harris

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:54:36 +0000, Gordon <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Charlie King <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:17:53 -0000, in
<[email hidden]> (uk.rec.walking) Fran

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

> Is this the same Paul Rooney who speaks ill of the dead, spams
> ng's and appears to follow the dross of usenet in an attempt
> to cause as much 'disruption' as possible?

Couldn't care less, he's transformed the Manchester United attack.
Did you see them against Bolton today?

ROLF!
--

Paul Rooney