On l'Equipe

Montesquiou said:

According the today morning l'Equipe, the Floyd's lawyer - Buxeda _ put
under suspition the IRMS technique by telling "Elle (IRMS) est tellement peu
fiable, scientifiquement que la plupart des laboratories ne l'utilisent pas.
En fait le laboratoire de Chatenay est sûrement le seul au monde à s'en
server encore"

Helas, I could'not find the english translation.

According to him

1 - IRMS is not reliable

2 - The French Lab is the last who till use this unreliable IRMS
The lawyer is, of course, aware that the Lab has found the synthetic Testo.

Now, we know the conduct he will follow.

Interesting, this confirms what L'Equipe wrote yesterday then in spite
of what the naysayers have been writing here.

IMRS is apparently the only credible test here, even
http://freefloydlandis.blogspot.com/ seem to agree ;-)

I'm a bit confused about the CIR test, must be the same thing

"Keith" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Montesquiou said:

According the today morning l'Equipe, the Floyd's lawyer - Buxeda _ put
under suspition the IRMS technique by telling "Elle (IRMS) est tellement
peu
fiable, scientifiquement que la plupart des laboratories ne l'utilisent
pas.
En fait le laboratoire de Chatenay est sûrement le seul au monde à s'en
server encore"

Helas, I could'not find the english translation.

According to him

1 - IRMS is not reliable

2 - The French Lab is the last who till use this unreliable IRMS
The lawyer is, of course, aware that the Lab has found the synthetic
Testo.

Now, we know the conduct he will follow.

Interesting, this confirms what L'Equipe wrote yesterday then in spite
of what the naysayers have been writing here.

IMRS is apparently the only credible test here, even
http://freefloydlandis.blogspot.com/ seem to agree ;-)

I'm a bit confused about the CIR test, must be the same thing

According l'Equipe the Bruxeda's comment is dogshit.
Christiane Ayotte (from AMA) told the reporter : " Faux; Le laboratoire de
Montréal utilise IRMS depuis 1999 de façon routinière. De plus au moins la
moitié des laboratoires reconnus par l'AMA y ont recours avec succès. Je
dirais même qu'une IRMS qui donne une origine synthétique est très
difficilement contestable."

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'm a bit confused about the CIR test, must be the same thing

According l'Equipe the Bruxeda's comment is dogshit.
Christiane Ayotte (from AMA) told the reporter : " Faux; Le laboratoire de
Montréal utilise IRMS depuis 1999 de façon routinière. De plus au moins la
moitié des laboratoires reconnus par l'AMA y ont recours avec succès. Je
dirais même qu'une IRMS qui donne une origine synthétique est très
difficilement contestable."

Good, that's in everyone's interest to put this to bed once and for
all.