General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Oakley Glasses - Opinion

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 366 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
26 August 2005
Last activity
27 August 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
366
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I recently tried on Oakley M Frame sungglasses and while all evidence
    indicates these are one of the best, if not the best, sunglasses in the
    world for sport I did see some things that I thought weren't right:

    1. Construction - appeared flimsy, almost like they should cost about
    $7.00. Now these could be the most well constructed glasses in the
    world but they certainly don't appear so.
    2. Nose Piece - Definitely gets in your feild of vision. That was real
    stupid to do that. Anyone else feel the same way?

    What I like:

    1. They will stay on your head during rigorous movement.
    2. Extremely lightweight like they're almost not there.
    3. Lense material appears to be very strong.
    4. They look good.

    So are these one of the best sunglasses to get?

  2. I've worn various sets of Oakleys all my adult life, and one thing
    you'll find is that you might need to try different models in their
    lineup to get one that you're completely happy with. For the most part
    they are nearly indestructible and will last as long as you take care
    of them.

    But they do make models for different facial shapes and uses, so don't
    be afraid to try something other than the M if it's not completely
    working for you.

    Mike C

    Quoted message said:

    I recently tried on Oakley M Frame sungglasses and while all evidence
    indicates these are one of the best, if not the best, sunglasses in the
    world for sport I did see some things that I thought weren't right:

    1. Construction - appeared flimsy, almost like they should cost about
    $7.00. Now these could be the most well constructed glasses in the
    world but they certainly don't appear so.
    2. Nose Piece - Definitely gets in your feild of vision. That was real
    stupid to do that. Anyone else feel the same way?

    What I like:

    1. They will stay on your head during rigorous movement.
    2. Extremely lightweight like they're almost not there.
    3. Lense material appears to be very strong.
    4. They look good.

    So are these one of the best sunglasses to get?

  3. found another pair yesterday. maybe a little glue. in 2 parts now.
    shoes were trio. I say. males size 11...
    at the radar place.

    the missing bags of P.I. new sub sign gone too. too block
    enterance.....
    1 was found. full of high weeds cuts.
    size 12 boots male
    runners knee
    3 point in heel, smaller then ball area. maybe b rubber boots.
    bag had a glove print. and was mudded.
    posible guy who grass cut trails thru high power electric lines
    paths.....
    yah it is him......
    why put bags there to block and then remove?
    who cares....I don't anymore.
    there the subs like flies on shat. only driveway and land and signs for
    sale.
    then years.......
    G E.
    subs...
    and years...

    and were the h I come from.
    I b the one in the dark looking at you.
    and to think I was going to make a smile and hello......
    :>😉 dome light..uni cool dudes......
    wrong info given.. you good to go:>😉

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.