Quoted message said:Subject: Nostalgia - selective quoting
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 7/29/2003 3:44 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>
Here's a little something I dredged up from my "sent items" folder.
Please note that I restricted my quote mining to the New Testament so
that I could not be accused of anything non-Christian.
Luke 3:24
Which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi, which was
[the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Janna, which was [the son]
of Joseph,
John 2:9
When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine,
and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water
knew😉 the governor of the feast called the bridegroom,
Acts 1:12
Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which
is from Jerusalem a sabbath day's journey.
James 5:20
Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of
his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of
sins.
Revelation 5:11
And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the
throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten
thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands;
Revelation 13:3
And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly
wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
You will see from these that the Bible says:
"Janna"
"drew"
"is ... a"
"sinner ... and"
"the voice of"
"the beast"
Poor Peter, are you having a break down because you know you lied again, and
can't post your proof??
I am still waiting.
Subject: Re: More Happenings in Wisconsin
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 7/28/2003 8:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Subject: Re: More Happenings in Wisconsin
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 7/28/2003 6:24 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>
(Jan) said:Last Wednesday, July 23rd, 2003, a formal complaint was filed against
Department of Regulation and Licensing employee Arthur Thexton with the
United
Quoted message said:States Attorney Department of Justice Western District of Wisconsin alleging
"Corruption in office by State official, attempted extortion, Mail Fraud,
Wire
Quoted message said:Fraud, Deprivation of intangible right of honest services."
If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
the prosecutor.
Did he discredit himself???
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:The complaint states in part: "The said Thexton has used his office to
defraud
Quoted message said:the State of Wisconsin of in excess of $75,000.00 (Seventy-five thousand
"dollars"😉 in conspiracy with one Robert S. Baratz, knowing the same Baratz
to
Quoted message said:be incompetent as an "expert witness", or having been required to
ascertain the
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:competency of the said Baratz prior to engaging Baratz's "services" on
behalf
Quoted message said:of the State of Wisconsin."
Quoted message said:If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
the witnesses.
If they are LYING, they will get more than discrediting. It is a FACT that
Baratz has LIED before, UNDER OATH!!!
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Then it goes on to say "The same Thexton has attempted, and continues to
attempt to extort performance of the undersigned, knowing, or being required
by
Quoted message said:his alleged training and professional experience to know, that neither
Thexton
Quoted message said:nor the Division of Enforcement,
Department of Regulation and Licensing, State
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:of Wisconsin have jurisdiction and/ or authority over the personal and
private
Quoted message said:activities and relationships of the undersigned."
Quoted message said:If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
the prosecutor.
You just can't face the truth, can you Peter??
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:And then it says "The enclosed documents shall provide prima facie evidence
of
Quoted message said:the malevolent intent and illegal and unlawful acts of the said Thexton.
Documentation is being acquired as evidence of the conversion of funds of
the
Quoted message said:State of Wisconsin by Arthur Thexton in conspiracy with Robert S. Baratz."
Quoted message said:If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
the prosecutor.
Uh huh.
You are running out of gas, so you have to repeat yourself.
Quoted message said:Stay tuned...
Quoted message said:
Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate
Quoted message said:Thank you, Jan, for passing this on, despite your dislike of Tim Bolen
and his tactics.
You are welcome.
Quoted message said:Do you have any idea when Bolen and his cronies are
going to produce their expert witness who can testify that using the
wrong chemical for chelation is acceptable medical practice?
The only source of what is going on is being posted by Tim. I am sure you
received it also.
Quoted message said:If I
remember correctly, you have had much to say in the past about doctors
administering the wrong chemical and, at the risk of being accused of
lying, I also seem to recall that you used an example of this to
demonise real doctors.
Do post where I demonised them.
You couldn't before, so as the old saying goes, put up or shut up.
You are LYING right through your teeth.
This is EXACTLY what I said:
From: Jan ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: A Lesson from Ben
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
View: Complete Thread (21 articles) |
Date: 2002-01-02 11:01:59 PST
<snipping to the *only* thing said about the doctor>
Yes. They did the right thing and my heart goes out to the doctor, and all
those involved. The parents in turn also did the right thing and dropped the
lawsuit. I was indeed very sad for everyone. This is why I started my post with
this sentence.
This post is NOT intended to go after any *ONE* individual.
Just where do you see any demonising??
Now do the right thing and post the proof or your claim. Otherwise be shown as
a REPEATED liar.
Quoted message said:In summary, here is the defence case for Dr Kadile:
NO,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,we don't need YOUR summary.
Now do post where I demonized any doctor in the Ben Kolb case.
I will be waiting. Neither will it do any good for your buddies to jump in, I
want to see the post from you.
It is D day time. And remember YOU BROUGHT IT UP.
Jan
PS. What happen to this??
A new moratorium on discussion with those who refuse to comprehend and
who selectively snip (sometimes without mentioning it) has been
declared until further notice. I will, however, address this last
message.
Ah??
