UK and Europe · Public discussion

Norwich Coroner - a step in the right direction

Started by wafflycat · · Last activity · 3 posts · 349 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
5 July 2007
Last activity
5 July 2007
Original author
wafflycat
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
349
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In today's local rag

    <http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/News/story.aspx?brand=ENOnline&category=News&tBrand=enonline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED05%20Jul%202007%2010%3A18%3A04%3A603>

    or

    <http://tinyurl.com/2uvksr>

    A step in the right direction:-

    "A campaign to encourage people to take road deaths seriously has taken a
    major step forward today with the coroner of Norwich agreeing to stop using
    the term “accidental death” at inquests."

    and

    "Today Mr Armstrong said he would no longer use “accident” when determining
    the cause of a death on the roads because this would imply that no one was
    responsible. Now the terms crash or collisions will be used instead.
    Mr Armstrong explained: “I made a decision to no longer use the term
    accident when referring to deaths on the roads. There is no such thing as
    accidental death - this sends out the wrong message that car crashes are
    unavoidable and no one is to blame but this is simply not true."

    An excellent move by the Norwich coroner IMO.

  2. wafflycat said the following on 05/07/2007 13:17:

    Quoted message said:

    Mr Armstrong explained: “I made a decision to no longer use the term
    accident when referring to deaths on the roads. There is no such thing
    as accidental death - this sends out the wrong message that car crashes
    are unavoidable and no one is to blame but this is simply not true."

    I believe the police stopped using the term "accident" years ago. It's
    now an RTC, not RTA. Having this attitude moving higher up the legal
    ladder can only be a good thing! Next step would be to get Radio 2
    traffic announcers to stop using the word "accident" :-)

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  3. wafflycat w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com said:

    Mr Armstrong explained: “I made a decision to no longer use the term
    accident when referring to deaths on the roads. There is no such thing as
    accidental death - this sends out the wrong message that car crashes are
    unavoidable and no one is to blame but this is simply not true."

    I noticed recently that the traffic news (on 'Heart FM' at least)
    practically never says accident now - they are all 'crash' or
    'collision' or occasionally 'incident'.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.