Mountain Bikes ยท Public discussion

Norco vs. Marin!!!

Started by Titanium_Fink ยท ยท Last activity ยท 3 posts ยท 2,732 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
5 September 2005
Last activity
23 October 2005
Original author
Titanium_Fink
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,732
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1โ€“3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have decided to get into this mountain biking sport ๐Ÿ™‚ , and have selected two possible bikes that might be good. The first one is the 2005 Norco Fluid 2 and the second is the 2005 Marin Rock Springs. Can anyone tell me which one is better and what are your opinions on them? ๐Ÿ˜•

  2. Titanium_Fink said:

    I have decided to get into this mountain biking sport ๐Ÿ™‚ , and have selected two possible bikes that might be good. The first one is the 2005 Norco Fluid 2 and the second is the 2005 Marin Rock Springs. Can anyone tell me which one is better and what are your opinions on them? ๐Ÿ˜•


    Marins - Good points

    • Marins peddle very efficiently due to the quad-link suspension design so there's little 'bio-pacing' when on tarmac.
    • They are quick off road, again due to the efficient quad link suspension design.
    • Good climber due to the quad-link suspension design
    • Good descender under moderatley challenging conditions (but see weaknesses)
    • THe Rock Springs has c. 130 mm of suspension travel which is enough for most things short of DH racing
    • The frames and build weight are reasonably competative
    • There is tons of mud clearance around the rear wheel, if that's important for your location, due to postioning of the quad links on the frame
    • The frame and main pivots all have a life time warranty, which Marin have a superb reputation for honouring in the UK on the rare occaisons when tested.
    • High bottom bracket with good peddle clearance for rocks etc...

    Marin - weaknesses

    • THe frame angles do not inspire confidence for very steep descending (think challenging Welsh mountain enduros with steep rocky descents of 300 plus metres). There is a tendancy to feel you are being pitched over the front of the bike and it is particularly difficult to keep your weight behind the saddle and over the back wheel.

    I have traded my Marin for an SC Blur, which is a signiificantly better bike all round (but at a price).

  3. Titanium_Fink said:

    I have decided to get into this mountain biking sport ๐Ÿ™‚ , and have selected two possible bikes that might be good. The first one is the 2005 Norco Fluid 2 and the second is the 2005 Marin Rock Springs. Can anyone tell me which one is better and what are your opinions on them? ๐Ÿ˜•


    hey i have a rock spring 2002 or 01 its on the heavy side but if u like the doen hill like i do that probably the one. i have now almost rebuilt the bike i ride hope m4 brakes and i can stop now. it a fun bike u get use to the weight but the new bikes are lighter. take it from me marins are no joke. cooooollll write me back if u need more inf.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users ยท 0 guests ยท0 bots ยท0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.