I have decided to get into this mountain biking sport ๐ , and have selected two possible bikes that might be good. The first one is the 2005 Norco Fluid 2 and the second is the 2005 Marin Rock Springs. Can anyone tell me which one is better and what are your opinions on them? ๐
Mountain Bikes ยท Public discussion
Norco vs. Marin!!!
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Mountain Bikes
- Published
- 5 September 2005
- Last activity
- 23 October 2005
- Original author
- Titanium_Fink
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 2,732
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Titanium_Fink said:
I have decided to get into this mountain biking sport ๐ , and have selected two possible bikes that might be good. The first one is the 2005 Norco Fluid 2 and the second is the 2005 Marin Rock Springs. Can anyone tell me which one is better and what are your opinions on them? ๐
Marins - Good points- Marins peddle very efficiently due to the quad-link suspension design so there's little 'bio-pacing' when on tarmac.
- They are quick off road, again due to the efficient quad link suspension design.
- Good climber due to the quad-link suspension design
- Good descender under moderatley challenging conditions (but see weaknesses)
- THe Rock Springs has c. 130 mm of suspension travel which is enough for most things short of DH racing
- The frames and build weight are reasonably competative
- There is tons of mud clearance around the rear wheel, if that's important for your location, due to postioning of the quad links on the frame
- The frame and main pivots all have a life time warranty, which Marin have a superb reputation for honouring in the UK on the rare occaisons when tested.
- High bottom bracket with good peddle clearance for rocks etc...
Marin - weaknesses
- THe frame angles do not inspire confidence for very steep descending (think challenging Welsh mountain enduros with steep rocky descents of 300 plus metres). There is a tendancy to feel you are being pitched over the front of the bike and it is particularly difficult to keep your weight behind the saddle and over the back wheel.
I have traded my Marin for an SC Blur, which is a signiificantly better bike all round (but at a price).
- Marins peddle very efficiently due to the quad-link suspension design so there's little 'bio-pacing' when on tarmac.
-
Titanium_Fink said:
I have decided to get into this mountain biking sport ๐ , and have selected two possible bikes that might be good. The first one is the 2005 Norco Fluid 2 and the second is the 2005 Marin Rock Springs. Can anyone tell me which one is better and what are your opinions on them? ๐
hey i have a rock spring 2002 or 01 its on the heavy side but if u like the doen hill like i do that probably the one. i have now almost rebuilt the bike i ride hope m4 brakes and i can stop now. it a fun bike u get use to the weight but the new bikes are lighter. take it from me marins are no joke. cooooollll write me back if u need more inf.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users ยท 0 guests ยท0 bots ยท0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.