Road Cycling · Public discussion

No one is in control

Started by Spees · · Last activity · 4 posts · 376 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
13 July 2004
Last activity
14 July 2004
Original author
Spees
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
376
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. No one team has been able to control the finale of the flat stages so
    far. I wonder why.

    1) In the past, did everyone just allow Cipo's red train or Telekom to
    set things up and then just jump on?
    2) Is there more parity in the field? Both among the leadout trains
    and the sprinters themselves?
    3) Are the GC teams getting in the way?

    I've read complaints from riders the things are more dangerous this
    year because of the lack of a dominant train.

    What gives?

    -Scott

  2. Spees said:

    No one team has been able to control the finale of the flat stages so
    far. I wonder why.

    1) In the past, did everyone just allow Cipo's red train or Telekom to
    set things up and then just jump on?
    2) Is there more parity in the field? Both among the leadout trains
    and the sprinters themselves?
    3) Are the GC teams getting in the way?

    I've read complaints from riders the things are more dangerous this
    year because of the lack of a dominant train.

    What gives?

    -Scott

    It's clear. This is the cleanest tour since 1990. The leadout trains
    are missing the extra edge.

  3. [email hidden] (Spees) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    No one team has been able to control the finale of the flat stages so
    far. I wonder why.

    1) In the past, did everyone just allow Cipo's red train or Telekom to
    set things up and then just jump on?
    2) Is there more parity in the field? Both among the leadout trains
    and the sprinters themselves?
    3) Are the GC teams getting in the way?

    I've read complaints from riders the things are more dangerous this
    year because of the lack of a dominant train.

    What gives?

    -Scott

    I think it has more to do with the sprinters realizing there isn't a
    super-Petacchi or super-Cipo amongst them. They believe they all have
    a chance. And that's probably the main reason why they aren't all
    fighting for the wheel of one dominating sprinter. In previous GT's
    everyone wanted to be in Petacchi's wheel. By doing this every rider
    who was not in peta' wheel was already eliminated before the actual
    sprint, only the guy in his wheel has a chance to beat him. Now,
    every sprinter has a little train (Zanini-Boonen, Kirsipuu-Nazon,
    Hinault-Hushovd, Vierhouten-McEwen), because they consider that as
    more important than fighting for the wheel of a dominating sprinter
    'cause there is none. This makes the sprints more chaotic, resulting
    in different winners.

  4. Kenny said:

    [email hidden] (Spees) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    No one team has been able to control the finale of the flat stages so
    far. I wonder why.


    sprint, only the guy in his wheel has a chance to beat him. Now,
    every sprinter has a little train (Zanini-Boonen, Kirsipuu-Nazon,
    Hinault-Hushovd, Vierhouten-McEwen)

    Julian Dean has been leading out Hushovd, and has in fact more or less led
    out the entire peloton every time Hushovd has contested the final sprint.

    --
    Stig Are M. Botterli
    [email hidden]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.