General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

No email address? No excuse.

Started by Soapless · · Last activity · 4 posts · 344 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 May 2004
Last activity
8 May 2004
Original author
Soapless
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
344
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Why come across as if this were the good old usenet? Manners
    have all but disappeared. Cross posting everywhere.

    When your email address is masked it speaks the obvious -
    you've been flamed before for your juvenile ways.

    Also, it shows how desperately you need the last word in
    thread, as responding to a masked email address is extra
    work in this "forum".

    And when you spend all your time snipping posts into your
    own jumbled mishmash, it means you have nothing constructive
    [or nice] to say.

    However, there is something about watching your misery
    unfold that I find, well grotesque but fitting. That
    you would go to such lengths to let us watch your
    struggle with love, decency, killing, etc., warms the
    cuckolds of my heart.

    bickering -that's all google increased by buying the usenet.

    check out the sufis if you like bickering -they're experts.

    Apparently we are in the middle of a 48,000 year cycle of
    bickering snd hypocrisy. They are so good a bickering that
    they can argue about how many steps it takes to run around
    in a circle indefinitely. Some say nine stepa, others ten,
    and believe it or not- even without a third opinion of say 8
    or 11 steps they can argue till death. Don't let the logic
    throw you. This is what goes on at google.

    The cutting and pasting is hilarious. Angry young [immature]
    men taking themselves far too seriously.

    People are here to post, not to argue with another over the
    right to post. This archive is worthless because netiquette
    is gone. Google will soon figure that out.

  2. [email hidden] (soapless) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Why come across as if this were the good old usenet?
    Manners have all but disappeared. Cross posting
    everywhere.

    Quoted message said:


    When your email address is masked it speaks the obvious -
    you've been flamed before for your juvenile ways.

    Wrong, [censored] lips. Not all of us ar so desperate for
    email that we

    Quoted message said:


    Also, it shows how desperately you need the last word in
    thread, as responding to a masked email address is extra
    work in this "forum".

    Well then, you're off to a good start demonstrating the
    points you don't like.

    Quoted message said:


    And when you spend all your time snipping posts into your
    own jumbled

    Quoted message said:

    mishmash, it means you have nothing

    Well will insert, delete compose,

    constructive [or nice] to say.

    Quoted message said:


    Wherever we so bloody well choose.

    Quoted message said:

    However, there is something about watching your misery

    The only miserable [censored] here is your own loser self, soapy.

    Quoted message said:

    bickering -that's all google increased by buying the
    usenet.

    So why are you starting a [censored] fight then? Need some
    attention, do we?

  3. "soapless" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    When your email address is masked it speaks the obvious -
    you've been flamed before for your juvenile ways.


    Not really, when I started using ng's several years ago,
    I was ignorant of the existence of spambots that roam
    the ng's harvesting e-mails for the spam [censored]. And,
    I was flooded with rising tides of spam as a result.
    Anyone with a minimal understanding of computer security
    would mung return e-mail addresses in ng postings.
    Perhaps you are thinking of deliberately munging the msg
    HEADER to prevent decent folks from reporting the
    continual and intentional violations of ISP ToS's, a
    common evasive tactic of trolls, like noBalls, dh,
    Dutch, and other psychopaths?

    Quoted message said:

    Also, it shows how desperately you need the last word in
    thread, as responding to a masked email address is extra
    work in this "forum".


    There is no "extra work", just hit "Reply to Group".
    Nobody wants/needs personal, singular replies. The idea
    of ng's is group, not one-on-one, discussion.

    Quoted message said:

    And when you spend all your time snipping posts into your
    own jumbled mishmash, it means you have nothing
    constructive [or nice] to say.


    Snipping text irrelevant to one's reply is simply
    courteous, conserves system resources, and facilitates
    meaningful discussion. The clowns who quote all the
    previous text and add only one grunt or two are wasting
    resources and clearly are not sincere about
    communicating.

    Quoted message said:

    -that's all google increased by buying the usenet.


    Google BOUGHT "the usenet"?? Could you supply a credible
    reference, please?

    Laurie

  4. "Laurie" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    "soapless" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    When your email address is masked it speaks the obvious
    - you've been flamed before for your juvenile ways.

    [..]

    Quoted message said:

    Perhaps you are thinking of deliberately munging the
    msg HEADER to prevent decent folks from reporting the
    continual and intentional


    violations

    Quoted message said:

    of ISP ToS's, a common evasive tactic of trolls, like
    noBalls, dh, Dutch, and other psychopaths?

    There's no indication that's what he meant, that's just
    *you* using any ruse to issue gratuitous insults.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And when you spend all your time snipping posts into
    your own jumbled mishmash, it means you have nothing
    constructive [or nice] to say.


    Snipping text irrelevant to one's reply is simply
    courteous, conserves system resources, and facilitates
    meaningful discussion. The clowns who quote all the
    previous text and add only one grunt or two are
    wasting resources and clearly are not sincere about
    communicating.

    {..] If you're so interested in courtesy, then why are
    you the ONLY person I have ever seen who refuses to
    insert a space between your reply and the previous text?
    This makes them awful to read, which your posts are
    anyway, based on content.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.