General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Nine Pounds In Two Weeks

Started by Dean S. Lautermilch · · Last activity · 3 posts · 281 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 July 2005
Last activity
5 July 2005
Original author
Dean S. Lautermilch
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
281
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I weighed myself since I was confident I was losing weight from the belt
    needing another notch. I'm down nine pounds.

    I was in a near miss this afternoon so on the way home I needed a hit of
    glucose. This car almost clipped me during a race with another.

    http://www.pbase.com/lautermilch/gtwreck

    I got some gum and was fine. I'm back in level three ketosis.

  2. : I weighed myself since I was confident I was losing weight from the belt
    : needing another notch. I'm down nine pounds.
    :
    : I was in a near miss this afternoon so on the way home I needed a hit of
    : glucose. This car almost clipped me during a race with another.
    :
    : http://www.pbase.com/lautermilch/gtwreck
    :
    : I got some gum and was fine. I'm back in level three ketosis.

    Congrats for losing the weight, but I am a bit confused. Why did you "need a
    hit of glucose"? I don't get it. Sure, you were startled and that means
    adrenaline out the wazoo, but "needing glucose"?

    On Thursday, I was riding my bike down a county road when a rottweiler came
    charging out at me. I surprised even myself by getting that bike going 27
    mph (it was a slight downhill, which helped). I was charged with adrenaline
    and my hair was standing on end, but at no time did I feel a need for
    glucose. So, I don't understand your reasoning. Can you explain?

    Pat in TX

    :
    :
    :

  3. Dean S. Lautermilch said:


    I weighed myself since I was confident I was losing weight from the belt
    needing another notch. I'm down nine pounds.

    Initial loss includes water so stay realistic about this
    type of progress. Don't let yourself think it's physically
    possible to lose anywhere near tht much pure fat once you
    run out of water. The fast initial loss is both
    encouraging and tends to create unrealistic expectations.

    Quoted message said:

    I was in a near miss this afternoon so on the way home I needed a hit of
    glucose. This car almost clipped me during a race with another.
    http://www.pbase.com/lautermilch/gtwreck

    What does a car wreck have to do with actual dietary
    needs? Nothing. Sure you had a big shock, no need to
    use it as an excuse early in your plan.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm back in level three ketosis.

    Ketosis only has two levels. Not detectable with the
    sticks, yes detectable with the sticks. You're positive
    and that's fine, trace or darker. (Okay, there are
    really other levels: not detectable with expensive
    equipment, detectable with expensive equipment but not
    the sticks, positive but not black on the sticks, black
    on the sticks but not toxic, toxic black on the sticks.
    it takes diabetic ketoacidocis to get to toxic).

    Early on the sticks tend to show darker levels. Don't
    let yourself think that what happens early is normal
    for later. The natural sequence of events is the first
    two weeks are an over-reaction by the body and the stuf
    that happens is a temporary extreme. Around week 3 the
    sticks head lighter and then stay there. This isn't a
    problem. It's the body going from overreacting to the
    real normal.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.