General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

never fails

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 69 posts · 592 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 October 2007
Last activity
22 October 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
592
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Roger Zoul said:

    "FOB" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Try unsweetened Ghirardelli chocolate, it's much better than Baker's.

    I will, if it's not carbier. The Baker's tastes good to me.

    1/4 cup virgin coconut oil, 1 packet Sweet Leaf Stevia Plus, 1/2
    tablespoon unsweetened cocoa. Mix together and refrigerate/freeze on
    a plate, in a plastic container, or spoon into small candy molds.
    Makes 4 servings - 1/2 gram of carb and 1/2 gram of fiber per
    serving. Rest is just good-for-you fat. 🙂

    I use candy molds that hold about 1 teaspoon each, so one serving is 3
    pieces.

    You can also use flavor oils. I've been experimenting with peppermint
    right now.

    Myra

  2. Chocolate is how you got fat in the first place.

    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "FOB" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Each half ounce square, plenty to satisfy the chocolate urge, is slightly
    over 2 g carb. They are thin bars so easier to break a section than the
    Baker's.

    ah...same carbs but easier to deal with. I'll definitely try it then as
    the store has them.

    Quoted message said:


    Roger Zoul wrote:
    | "FOB" <[email hidden]> wrote
    |
    || Try unsweetened Ghirardelli chocolate, it's much better than Baker's.
    |
    | I will, if it's not carbier. The Baker's tastes good to me.
    |
    ||
    || Roger Zoul wrote:
    ||| Unsweetened Baker's chocolate....

  3. Myra wrote:
    :: On Oct 10, 3:20 pm, "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    ::: "FOB" <[email hidden]> wrote
    :::
    :::: Try unsweetened Ghirardelli chocolate, it's much better than
    :::: Baker's.
    :::
    ::: I will, if it's not carbier. The Baker's tastes good to me.
    ::
    :: 1/4 cup virgin coconut oil, 1 packet Sweet Leaf Stevia Plus, 1/2
    :: tablespoon unsweetened cocoa. Mix together and refrigerate/freeze on
    :: a plate, in a plastic container, or spoon into small candy molds.
    :: Makes 4 servings - 1/2 gram of carb and 1/2 gram of fiber per
    :: serving. Rest is just good-for-you fat. 🙂
    ::
    :: I use candy molds that hold about 1 teaspoon each, so one serving is
    :: 3 pieces.
    ::
    :: You can also use flavor oils. I've been experimenting with
    :: peppermint right now.
    ::
    :: Myra

    Thanks, M! 🙂

  4. Susan said:

    x-no-archive: yes

    FOB said:

    Try unsweetened Ghirardelli chocolate, it's much better than Baker's.

    Quoted message said:

    Roger Zoul wrote:
    | Unsweetened Baker's chocolate....

    There are much better choices than both of those, Scharffen Berger, for
    example.

    Michel Cluizel Le Noir. It is 99%, comes in a bar or little dots. Is a
    tasting
    experience. FWIW: Cluizel's worst product is better than Hershey's
    (or it's subsidiary brand Scharffenberger's) best. IMHO.

  5. Quoted message said:
    Jackie Patti said:
    Doug Freyburger said:

    "Pat" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > What's with this drinking oil?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's a way to bring up total calories, and it's a way to increase the
    fat to protein ratio. It's also self-limiting the time I tried it -
    Within
    a couple of days I could no longer gag the stuff down.

    Quoted message said:

    I just can't see sipping oil.

    Quoted message said:

    It seems to me much easier to add fat to your diet by combining it with
    veggies: butterhead lettuce with olive oil drizzled on top; bell
    peppers, onions and garlic stirfried in avocado oil; an artichoke dipped
    in melted butter.

    Quoted message said:

    It's dead simple to get lots of fat if you use a veggie substrate for
    the fat.

    Quoted message said:

    --http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

    Onions rock but they're also 8 carbs per half cup and an artichoke is
    about the same depending on how you cook it.

    Lettuce...personally, I'd rather inhale fresh radon from the garden,
    but thanks for the suggestion.

    Why not skip the carby middle man and go for something like
    Florentine beefsteak. Porterhouse + salt, pepper, aromatics and
    extra virgin olive oil. Or, go with compound butter sauces. Old
    school,
    like before Ancel Keys tried to kill us all.

  6. Hollywood wrote:
    :: On Oct 10, 6:31 pm, Susan <[email hidden]> wrote:
    ::: x-no-archive: yes
    :::
    ::: FOB wrote:
    :::: Try unsweetened Ghirardelli chocolate, it's much better than
    :::: Baker's.
    :::
    :::: Roger Zoul wrote:
    ::::: Unsweetened Baker's chocolate....
    :::
    ::: There are much better choices than both of those, Scharffen Berger,
    ::: for example.
    ::
    :: Michel Cluizel Le Noir. It is 99%, comes in a bar or little dots. Is
    :: a tasting
    :: experience. FWIW: Cluizel's worst product is better than Hershey's
    :: (or it's subsidiary brand Scharffenberger's) best. IMHO.

    That Baker's chocolate is 100%. What makes one brand better or worse than
    another if they're not really adding anything?

  7. x-no-archive: yes

    Roger Zoul said:

    That Baker's chocolate is 100%.

    Yes, I know.

    What makes one brand better or worse than

    Quoted message said:

    another if they're not really adding anything?

    There's huge variety in the flavor of chocolate depending upon the
    variety and where it's grown, single origin or how it's blended.

    Susan

  8. Losertown USA said:
    Doug Freyburger said:

    "Pat" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What's with this drinking oil?

    Quoted message said:

    It's a way to bring up total calories, and it's a way to increase the
    fat to protein ratio. It's also self-limiting the time I tried it -
    Within a couple of days I could no longer gag the stuff down.

    I tried it as "your body, your science experiment". I was not much
    surprised when it triggered the gag reflex, but people kept saying
    they tend to binge on fatty foods and I wanted to check for myself
    how much those claims had to do with the carbs and/or protein
    the fat is mixed with. In my case the more carbs mixed with the
    fat (cookies) the more I will continue to over eat, but the more
    protein mixed with the fat (steak) the less drive to over eat.
    Purity of the fat matters so butter on triggers gag for me. I've
    read for who will chug heavy cream but I haven't tried that level
    of fat on myself.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I see it as a common mistake folks make early in the plan. The
    appetite drops, the newness of that impresses, and over-reaction
    is done. As long as folks are nudged back towards eating real
    food like veggies and meat, it should be temporary.

    My rule is generally that when I'm not hungry, I don't eat.

    Your body, your science experiment. Treating food as a hunger
    prevention mechanism means paying attention to portions and
    gradually reducing to see if hunger is trigger - More work. IMO
    waiting to get hungry before eating very gradually erodes my
    motivation - Less work but a worse long term strategy. Especially
    with the appetite suppression of ketonuria it's easy to drop into
    starvation by wating until hunger arrives.

    Quoted message said:

    I've been
    on a course of steroids and antidperessants, and I know that insulin
    resistance has grown horns, a tail and rented a condo in my body at
    this point. When my IR is low, I can eat 2000 and maintain my weight
    way way under 200 pounds. When it's high, I have to go under 1500 at
    least,

    Since you know your calorie target, I suggest it's better to work to
    the target than to use appetite to drive your food.

    Quoted message said:

    and I tend to push the fat content up rather than add veggies
    or protein.

    Both fat and protein increase glucagon so both drive fat
    out of storage. It's ambiguous which is better at it and there
    is disagreement on ASDLC on the topic. I'm in the fat
    school and I have used lower-protein/higher-fat to bust stalls.

    Quoted message said:

    Protein also spikes insulin to a lesser degree, Non starchy vegetables
    do the same.

    That's extreme insulin resistance. Since IR varies by person,
    shooting
    for an average because it's an average is not the way to go once
    you've
    learned the ways you aren't average ...

  9. I wonder how much of that is conditioning and how much natural aversion. I
    enjoy butter, especially nice little slices of very cold butter, can
    consume a condiserable amount of heavy cream with no problem. I also love
    the fat on meat. I never bought into the low fat thing.

    Doug Freyburger wrote:
    |
    | I tried it as "your body, your science experiment". I was not much
    | surprised when it triggered the gag reflex, but people kept saying
    | they tend to binge on fatty foods and I wanted to check for myself
    | how much those claims had to do with the carbs and/or protein
    | the fat is mixed with. In my case the more carbs mixed with the
    | fat (cookies) the more I will continue to over eat, but the more
    | protein mixed with the fat (steak) the less drive to over eat.
    | Purity of the fat matters so butter on triggers gag for me. I've
    | read for who will chug heavy cream but I haven't tried that level
    | of fat on myself.
    |


  10. Quoted message said:

    And then about three days ago, on day sixteen, my appetite just went
    away. Just plain left. I was able to pay attention to what I was
    eating because I really didn't want it anyway.

    I can never get over this when it happens. It actually took a little
    longer than usual, but what a miracle. Not only that, my bad mood
    lifted, my concentration was better, and the anxiety I had been
    feeling just melted. My calories drifted down just magically and today
    I had to take a couple spoonfuls of oil to get to 1200.

    c

    This is the part I don't understand. You say you're not hungry but you
    consume additional, unnecessary products in order to get your calorie count
    up to an arbitrary number. Why not just say, "I'm not hungry so I don't need
    to eat."

    Pat in TX

  11. Roger Zoul said:

    "Susan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    x-no-archive: yes

    Roger Zoul said:

    Unsweetened Baker's chocolate....


    BLEAH, I won't touch that brand, and I do like just a touch of sugar in
    mine. I think 85% is my limit.

    Frankly, I've not encountered any chocolate whose carb count was low enough
    that thought I could handle eating just one square, other than this stuff.

    The Lindt 85% stuff has 8 gram of carb (5 net after fiber subtraction),
    in a serving of 4 squares. Personally, this is one of those cases where
    the servings seem too big to me; dark chocolate is awfully rich, so it's
    rare for me to eat more than 2 squares. This is probably the only real
    sugar I have eaten in years, just there's so little it hardly matters.

    Lately, I've been eating my coconut oil/cocoa/DaVinci concoction instead
    of Lindt though. It tastes less strong than dark chocolate so I like it
    better. And there's lots of flavor choices with the syrups. The
    biggest advantage though is bg... I don't have to take insulin to snack
    on it. It's nearly all fat, so I can't measure an effect on bg. It's
    pretty much the only between-meal snack I can have other than sugar-free
    jello, which I find to be incredibly nasty stuff.

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  12. Roger Zoul said:

    Hollywood wrote:

    :: On Oct 10, 6:31 pm, Susan <[email hidden]> wrote:
    ::: x-no-archive: yes
    :::::: FOB wrote:

    :::: Try unsweetened Ghirardelli chocolate, it's much better than
    :::: Baker's.
    ::::::: Roger Zoul wrote:

    ::::: Unsweetened Baker's chocolate....
    :::
    ::: There are much better choices than both of those, Scharffen Berger,
    ::: for example.
    ::
    :: Michel Cluizel Le Noir. It is 99%, comes in a bar or little dots. Is
    :: a tasting
    :: experience. FWIW: Cluizel's worst product is better than Hershey's
    :: (or it's subsidiary brand Scharffenberger's) best. IMHO.

    That Baker's chocolate is 100%. What makes one brand better or worse than
    another if they're not really adding anything?

    Ah, the bliss of ignorance.

    Sourcing. Varietal. Process.
    There's a lot that goes on from turning
    This item:
    http://a248.e.akamai.net/f/248/5462/2h/naturalselections.safeshopper.com/images/bl11sos8.jpg
    Into this one:
    http://www.chocolatetradingco.com/images/fullsize/michel_cluizel_99.l.jpg
    And it ain't just packaging.

  13. Roger Zoul said:

    Hollywood wrote:

    :: On Oct 10, 6:31 pm, Susan <[email hidden]> wrote:
    ::: x-no-archive: yes
    :::::: FOB wrote:

    :::: Try unsweetened Ghirardelli chocolate, it's much better than
    :::: Baker's.
    ::::::: Roger Zoul wrote:

    ::::: Unsweetened Baker's chocolate....
    :::
    ::: There are much better choices than both of those, Scharffen Berger,
    ::: for example.
    ::
    :: Michel Cluizel Le Noir. It is 99%, comes in a bar or little dots. Is
    :: a tasting
    :: experience. FWIW: Cluizel's worst product is better than Hershey's
    :: (or it's subsidiary brand Scharffenberger's) best. IMHO.

    That Baker's chocolate is 100%. What makes one brand better or worse than
    another if they're not really adding anything?

    I should also note, I misspoke. The product I'm talking about is
    Le Noir Infini 99%.

    I'm reasonably sure that it is a cost upgrade over Bakers.

  14. Quoted message said:

    I searched high and low for a carb free chocolate source. I wanted
    something inside the same budget as maybe a splenda packet. I scoured
    all the baking sites, dabbled with couverture, performed various
    pathetic experiments with cocoa powder and butter, cocoa butter, and
    cream cheese, and there was still nothing that didn't come right down
    to at least four carbs per serving.

    Try coconut bark.

    Melt 1/4 cup coconut oil, then stir in 1 TB DaVinci syrup (flavor of
    your choice), and 1 TB cocoa. Pour into a metal dish and stick in the
    freezer for a few minutes (it needs to solidify fast before the syrup
    separates from the oil). Then crack into pieces and store in the fridge.

    This makes two servings at 1.4g carb, 0.5g protein, 239 kilocalories.

    Come to think of it, it'd probably be more pleasant than the sipping oil
    thing you do. It's nearly all fat to eat this stuff so almost the same.

    Recently, I bought a different brand of coconut oil and all my barks
    taste like Mounds bars now no matter what flavor of DaVinci I use. I'll
    go back to the previous brand next time, which didn't taste so coconut-y.

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  15. Jackie Patti said:

    Try coconut bark.

    Melt 1/4 cup coconut oil, then stir in 1 TB DaVinci syrup (flavor of
    your choice), and 1 TB cocoa. Pour into a metal dish and stick in the
    freezer for a few minutes (it needs to solidify fast before the syrup
    separates from the oil). Then crack into pieces and store in the fridge.

    This makes two servings at 1.4g carb, 0.5g protein, 239 kilocalories.

    I forgot to subtract... 0.9g of those carbs are fiber, so it's 0.5g net
    carb.

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  16. Roger Zoul said:

    That Baker's chocolate is 100%. What makes one brand better or worse than
    another if they're not really adding anything?

    That's 100% chocolate, not 100% cocoa.

    When we're discussing the high-cocoa chocolate bars, the percent refers
    to cocoa.

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  17. Jackie Patti wrote:
    :: Roger Zoul wrote:
    ::
    ::: That Baker's chocolate is 100%. What makes one brand better or
    ::: worse than another if they're not really adding anything?
    ::
    :: That's 100% chocolate, not 100% cocoa.

    No, I don't think so:
    http://www.kraftfoods.com/BakersChocolate/BakersBrands.htm

    ::
    :: When we're discussing the high-cocoa chocolate bars, the percent
    :: refers to cocoa.

    What is chocolate?
    ::
    :: --
    :: http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  18. Jackie Patti wrote:
    :: [email hidden] wrote:
    ::
    ::: I searched high and low for a carb free chocolate source. I wanted
    ::: something inside the same budget as maybe a splenda packet. I
    ::: scoured all the baking sites, dabbled with couverture, performed
    ::: various pathetic experiments with cocoa powder and butter, cocoa
    ::: butter, and cream cheese, and there was still nothing that didn't
    ::: come right down to at least four carbs per serving.
    ::
    :: Try coconut bark.
    ::
    :: Melt 1/4 cup coconut oil, then stir in 1 TB DaVinci syrup (flavor of
    :: your choice), and 1 TB cocoa. Pour into a metal dish and stick in
    :: the freezer for a few minutes (it needs to solidify fast before the
    :: syrup separates from the oil). Then crack into pieces and store in
    :: the fridge.
    ::

    This sounds somewhat similar to what Myra posted.

    :: This makes two servings at 1.4g carb, 0.5g protein, 239 kilocalories.
    ::
    :: Come to think of it, it'd probably be more pleasant than the sipping
    :: oil thing you do. It's nearly all fat to eat this stuff so almost
    :: the same.
    ::
    :: Recently, I bought a different brand of coconut oil and all my barks
    :: taste like Mounds bars now no matter what flavor of DaVinci I use.
    :: I'll go back to the previous brand next time, which didn't taste so
    :: coconut-y.
    ::
    :: --
    :: http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

  19. x-no-archive: yes

    Roger Zoul said:

    Jackie Patti wrote:
    :: Roger Zoul wrote:
    ::
    ::: That Baker's chocolate is 100%. What makes one brand better or
    ::: worse than another if they're not really adding anything?
    ::
    :: That's 100% chocolate, not 100% cocoa.

    No, I don't think so:
    http://www.kraftfoods.com/BakersChocolate/BakersBrands.htm

    ::
    :: When we're discussing the high-cocoa chocolate bars, the percent
    :: refers to cocoa.

    What is chocolate?

    It's chocolate and cocoa butter combined. Cocoa content is the %
    mentioned, not chocolate, which is the product produced using cocoa mass
    and other constituents.

    Susan

  20. Susan wrote:
    :: x-no-archive: yes
    ::
    :: Roger Zoul wrote:
    ::: Jackie Patti wrote:
    ::::: Roger Zoul wrote:
    :::::
    :::::: That Baker's chocolate is 100%. What makes one brand better or
    :::::: worse than another if they're not really adding anything?
    :::::
    ::::: That's 100% chocolate, not 100% cocoa.
    :::
    ::: No, I don't think so:
    ::: http://www.kraftfoods.com/BakersChocolate/BakersBrands.htm
    :::
    :::::
    ::::: When we're discussing the high-cocoa chocolate bars, the percent
    ::::: refers to cocoa.
    :::
    ::: What is chocolate?
    ::
    :: It's chocolate and cocoa butter combined.

    Do you mean ground, dried cocoa beans and cocoa butter combined?

    :: Cocoa content is the %
    :: mentioned, not chocolate, which is the product produced using cocoa
    :: mass and other constituents.

    It seems a bit confusing, since we're saying its chocolate. So what does
    cocoa % mean in terms of the product? It can't mean you're mixing X% cocoa
    with cocoa butter, can it?
    And cocoa butter is what, exactly? That's the fat that comes from the bean,
    right?

    And why are we taking about eating beans in here? 🙂

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.