Bike buying advice · Public discussion

Need help with fitment

Started by Azikara · · Last activity · 2 posts · 1,393 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Bike buying advice
Published
28 February 2008
Last activity
29 February 2008
Original author
Azikara
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,393
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've looked at www.bikefitting.com and Colorado cyclist to figure out my frame size. I also went into a store and had a Trek dealer fit me. I have a 83cm inseam and stand 5'9.5" I came out as a 56 on the Trek. I want to buy a Look which is either L (55) or M (53).

    When using the above calculators with my 83cm inseam I should have a C-C size frame of 54 cm and C-T of 55.6 cm.

    When I look at the Look geometry they have a real C-C and a virtual C-C.

    For example, for the L frame: real C-C = 50.5cm and virtual = 55.7

    Q1: Is the L frame too big for me?

    Q2: This is puzzling, the C-T (Actual) measurement is 55cm but the C-C (virtual) is 55.7!! Can the C-T actual really be smaller than the C-C virtual?

    Thanks
    Azzy

  2. Azikara said:

    I've looked at www.bikefitting.com and Colorado cyclist to figure out my frame size. I also went into a store and had a Trek dealer fit me. I have a 83cm inseam and stand 5'9.5" I came out as a 56 on the Trek. I want to buy a Look which is either L (55) or M (53).

    When using the above calculators with my 83cm inseam I should have a C-C size frame of 54 cm and C-T of 55.6 cm.

    When I look at the Look geometry they have a real C-C and a virtual C-C.

    For example, for the L frame: real C-C = 50.5cm and virtual = 55.7

    Q1: Is the L frame too big for me?

    Q2: This is puzzling, the C-T (Actual) measurement is 55cm but the C-C (virtual) is 55.7!! Can the C-T actual really be smaller than the C-C virtual?

    Thanks
    Azzy


    I would not pay too much attention to the seat tube dim. The top tube length is more important.
    regarding your question: the actual is shorter because is measured along the actual seat tube length; the virtual dimension is measured along an imaginary line that would extend the seat tube until it meets the virtual top tube (if the frame has a sloping top tube geometry)
    check a site like:
    http://www.competitivecyclist.com/za/CCY?PAGE=FIT_CALCULATOR_INTRO
    where you get a top tube dimension based on your upper body and arm length reach and the "position" you want achieve.
    I am 5-10 and could ride a 56, 57, 58 and 59 cm frames depending on how i want to ride. The bigger frames minimize the saddle to handlebar drop while the smaller frames get you in a more "aero" position with a higher saddle to handlebar drop. The distance from BB to saddle will remain more or less the same in any of the sizes I'd ride since its based on my leg length (crotch dim)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.