Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Mystery part or pointless number?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 4 posts · 463 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 September 2006
Last activity
30 September 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
463
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a bike with a Record 9-Speed ergo group (ca. 1998). Recently,
    while replacing a broken spoke I took apart the cogset to clean it and
    noticed some of the cog spacers had a number molded into them. There
    were two with a 2, one or two with a 4 and two with a 7. They all look
    to be the same thickness but I don't have an accurate means to measure
    them. The little booklet that came with the cogset makes no mention of
    a size variation. Are these just mold identity numbers, or a secret
    conspiracy by the Soviet olympic road team?

    r

  2. Quoted message said:

    I have a bike with a Record 9-Speed ergo group (ca. 1998). Recently,
    while replacing a broken spoke I took apart the cogset to clean it and
    noticed some of the cog spacers had a number molded into them. There
    were two with a 2, one or two with a 4 and two with a 7. They all look
    to be the same thickness but I don't have an accurate means to measure
    them. The little booklet that came with the cogset makes no mention of
    a size variation. Are these just mold identity numbers, or a secret
    conspiracy by the Soviet olympic road team?

    r

    Never noticed that..on the amber plastic spacers? Must be some sort of
    conspiracy..probably initiated by shimano-

  3. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a bike with a Record 9-Speed ergo group (ca. 1998). Recently,
    while replacing a broken spoke I took apart the cogset to clean it and
    noticed some of the cog spacers had a number molded into them. There
    were two with a 2, one or two with a 4 and two with a 7. They all look
    to be the same thickness but I don't have an accurate means to measure
    them. The little booklet that came with the cogset makes no mention of
    a size variation. Are these just mold identity numbers, or a secret
    conspiracy by the Soviet olympic road team?

    Never noticed that..on the amber plastic spacers? Must be some sort of
    conspiracy..probably initiated by shimano-

    Hmmmm. Now I'm wondering too. I just threw a 13-26 on my 'cross bike
    and didn't bother looking at which spacer went where. It shifts OK,
    but I swear (now that the idea is planted in my beanie) that some
    gears are a bit noisier than they should be. Could it be that there
    is a correct order to put those spacers in? Yikes.

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

  4. Group: rec.bicycles.tech
    Date: Fri, Sep 29, 2006, 5:53am (EDT-3) From: [email hidden]
    (Qui si parla Campagnolo)

    Quoted message said:

    Never noticed that..on the amber plastic
    spacers? Must be some sort of
    conspiracy..probably initiated by
    shimano-

    Are you saying that Camagnolo's secruity is so weak that someone from
    Shimano (or any other manufacturer) can simply walk in and install
    different dies on their machine?

    No wonder they're no longer the top manufacturer! ;-3)

    - -
    Compliments of:
    "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Messages sent to the above "E" addy will be lost forever! If you want to
    E-mail me:

    ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net

    My website:
    http://geocities.com/czcorner

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.