Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

MX Comp. ETAs

Started by Tim Izod · · Last activity · 2 posts · 711 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
25 June 2004
Last activity
25 June 2004
Original author
Tim Izod
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
711
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been looking to replace the crappy RS Jetts on my 2001
    Kona & had been looking at replacing them with MX Comp
    ETAs[*] & I mentioned this in my LBS last night when hunting
    for cone spanners. Their response was to save my pennies &
    just get the plain MX Comps as they'd had a lot of problems
    and returns down to the ETA bits.

    Since they're pretty good and were recomending forks
    40UKP cheaper I'm tempted to save the money and
    follow their advice.

    However, a bit of googling last night didn't turn up
    too many bad reports last night & great big bundles
    of praise.

    Has anybody here got any advice or opinions to
    offer? Or even suggestion of other forks to look at
    in a similar price bracket?

    [*] did have a slight concern about replacing 65mm travel
    forks with something longer. Google, Marzocchi's pages & a
    tape measure suggest the distance between bottom headset
    race and axle is comparible. (455mm on the Jett & 458/478mm
    for 85/105mm MX Comp.) My maths suggests that should't make
    for badness. Again if I'm wrong, please shout🙂
    --
    Tim. /\ /\ O___O
    =\__|__/= meow.
    U

  2. Hi Tim

    I have some MX Comp ETA's (2003) and have had no problems
    whatsoever so far. They're great forks and the ETA is
    definately worthwhile having. I wouldn't buy any forks
    without some form of lockout now. My only critisism of
    Marzocchi is they don't do a remote lockout kit for the ETA.

    Mine are 105mm restricted to 85mm as I'm on a 1" steerer.
    Currently at Windwave having a 1 1/8" steerer pressed in as
    I have a new frame. As soon as I get them back, I'll remove
    the restrictor to get the full 105mm. :-)

    Ash

    "Tim Izod" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:2k25giF16pemrU1@uni-
    berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:

    I've been looking to replace the crappy RS Jetts on my
    2001 Kona & had been looking at replacing them with MX
    Comp ETAs[*] & I mentioned this in my LBS last night when
    hunting for cone spanners. Their response was to save my
    pennies & just get the plain MX Comps as they'd had a lot
    of problems and returns down to the ETA bits.

    Since they're pretty good and were recomending forks
    40UKP cheaper I'm tempted to save the money and follow
    their advice.

    However, a bit of googling last night didn't turn up too
    many bad reports last night & great big bundles of praise.

    Has anybody here got any advice or opinions to offer? Or
    even suggestion of other forks to look at in a similar
    price bracket?

    [*] did have a slight concern about replacing 65mm
    travel forks with something longer. Google, Marzocchi's
    pages & a tape measure suggest the distance between
    bottom headset race and axle is comparible. (455mm on
    the Jett & 458/478mm for 85/105mm MX Comp.) My maths
    suggests that should't make for badness. Again if I'm
    wrong, please shout🙂
    --
    Tim. /\ /\ O___O
    =\__|__/= meow.
    U

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.