General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS): The Afflicted

Started by Ilena · · Last activity · 5 posts · 255 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
7 February 2004
Last activity
8 February 2004
Original author
Ilena
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
255
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://allergies.about.com/cs/mcs/a/aa012599.htm

    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS): The Afflicted

    EXCERPT
    Those most likely to be associated with MCS are industrial workers,
    "sick building" occupants, those living in chemically contaminated
    communities, Gulf War veterans, and women with silicone breast
    implants.

    NOTE FROM Ilena ... For years, the Quack / Junk Science Shills have
    been lying for their funders, the Chemical Cartel ... even going to
    the depths of demanding that those find doctors and scientists trying
    to find the causes-cures have their licenses removed.

    Head Quack Stephen Barrett has been paid by write about this and
    spread this disinformation. More on this later in this thread.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    People With Allergies Are More Susceptible to Chemicals
    Those who are afflicted with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS)
    suffer from a multitude of ailments, that have very real consequences.

    MCS is a worldwide illness that can affect anyone, and most who suffer
    from this disorder were healthy before becoming ill. Some believe that
    children, the elderly, and people with allergic illnesses seem to be
    more susceptible to chemicals than the average person. Some people can
    be genetically susceptible also.

    More women than men are affected by this illness. It is believed that
    since men produce Testosterone, it often covers up the symptoms and
    warning signs until it is too late. Women produce Estrogen which does
    not cover up the symptoms.

    There is also the theory that because women use more toxic products
    from cosmetics to household cleaners than men, they are more
    susceptible.

    Those most likely to be associated with MCS are industrial workers,
    "sick building" occupants, those living in chemically contaminated
    communities, Gulf War veterans, and women with silicone breast
    implants.

    Half of those with MCS also suffer with traditional (IgE) allergies,
    in other words, they can also be susceptible to food, mold, or dust
    allergies.

    Causes & Triggers
    Clinical Ecologists believe that repeated small exposures or one large
    high exposure to chemical agents over time can lead to the body losing
    its ability to detox. This can sensitize people and cause their immune
    systems to malfunction. Once the body's ability to process toxins is
    damaged, the person may be more susceptible to chemicals that never
    caused a problem before.

    The body's detox processes can be impaired by other means besides
    chemical agents. Some other causes of MCS include viruses, severe
    emotional or physical trauma (especially in childhood), liver damage,
    or metabolism disorders. Some people with MCS may have a genetic
    disorder of the enzyme pathways (porphyria), which may not manifest
    until triggered by a chemical exposure.

    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity can be triggered by a multitude of
    chemicals. Mostly petrochemicals, they can be found in pesticides,
    herbicides, perfumes, fragrances, paints, wood treatments, glues,
    carpets, furniture, shampoo, soap, detergents, cleaners, plastics,
    solvents, markers, raw fuels, engine exhaust, alcohol, medications,
    caffeine and food additives to name a few. Pollution can also play a
    part in this disorder.

    Symptoms
    The symptoms of MCS can be similar to those of traditional allergies,
    such as headaches, migraines, dizziness, nausea, anaphylactic shock,
    breathing difficulty, rashes and other skin eruptions. Of course,
    there can be other symptoms such as acute abdominal pain, prolonged
    fatigue, insomnia, neurological signs, loss of concentration, memory
    loss, body aches and pains, and even progressive coordination
    impairment. Keep in mind this is not an all inclusive list.

    Treatment
    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity is difficult for physicians to diagnose
    because there is no single set of symptoms which fit together as a
    syndrome. There is also not one diagnostic test that will detect every
    manifestation of the disorder.

    Physicians must become detectives to sort out a patient's medical
    history and pay attention to the patient's environmental or
    occupational exposures in order to correctly diagnose MCS.

    As with allergies, avoidance is the key in treating MCS. As with its
    symptoms, treatment varies with the individual afflicted.

    It may be helpful to use an air purifying system. The American
    Environmental Health Foundation suggests the food you eat, and the
    personal care products you use may contain offensive chemicals. Be
    careful what you purchase and read the labels.

    For additional information on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, please
    refer to the collected Internet links.

    ~ Judy Tidwell

    ªªªªªªªªªªªªªª

    www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

  2. Quoted message said:

    Treatment
    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity is difficult for physicians to diagnose
    because there is no single set of symptoms which fit together as a
    syndrome. There is also not one diagnostic test that will detect every
    manifestation of the disorder.
    Physicians must become detectives to sort out a patient's medical
    history and pay attention to the patient's environmental or
    occupational exposures in order to correctly diagnose MCS.

    As with allergies, avoidance is the key in treating MCS. As with its
    symptoms, treatment varies with the individual afflicted.

    So you can apply it to anyone who feels they are so afflicted or who senses
    that there are gains to be made from it.

    The diagnosis offers no obvious treatment strategy, other than that of
    avoidance, which has serious social and economic consequences for the
    patients and their family. Workmates and family often sense the underlying
    histrionic basis to the illness and add to the patient's social isolation.

    To qualify for the diagnosis patients have to allow themselves to become
    hypersensitive to their perceived chemical environament, even though blinded
    testing has repeatedly shown that the intolerances are spurious.

    Peter Moran

  3. "Ilena" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://allergies.about.com/cs/mcs/a/aa012599.htm


    [...]

    Quoted message said:


    NOTE FROM Ilena ... For years, the Quack / Junk Science Shills have
    been lying for their funders, the Chemical Cartel ... even going to
    the depths of demanding that those find doctors and scientists trying
    to find the causes-cures have their licenses removed.

    Head Quack Stephen Barrett has been paid by write about this and
    spread this disinformation. More on this later in this thread.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------


    ------

    Note from Nana...For years, the Quackboosters/Junk Science Flacks
    have been lying for their funders,,,spreading misinformation and
    downright harmful lies.
    Head Quackbooster Ilena Rosenthal has been paid to write about
    this and spread disinformation about a sweet wonderful man,
    Dr. Stephen Barrett. Take a looksee at what this beautiful humanitarian
    has written about MCS.
    http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/mcs.html

    [snip copyright violation by morally corrupt Ilena Rosenthal]

  4. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS): The Afflicted
    From: "Peter Moran" [email hidden]
    Date: 2/7/2004 1:36 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id:
    <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Treatment
    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity is difficult for physicians to diagnose
    because there is no single set of symptoms which fit together as a
    syndrome. There is also not one diagnostic test that will detect every
    manifestation of the disorder.
    Physicians must become detectives to sort out a patient's medical
    history and pay attention to the patient's environmental or
    occupational exposures in order to correctly diagnose MCS.

    As with allergies, avoidance is the key in treating MCS. As with its
    symptoms, treatment varies with the individual afflicted.

    So you can apply it to anyone who feels they are so afflicted or who senses
    that there are gains to be made from it.

    THAT'S IT THAT'S IT!!!

    Quoted message said:

    The diagnosis offers no obvious treatment strategy, other than that of
    avoidance, which has serious social and economic consequences for the
    patients and their family.

    Conventional diagnoses.

    No treatment.

    Quoted message said:

    To qualify for the diagnosis patients have to allow themselves to become
    hypersensitive to their perceived chemical environament,

    Yes they ALLOW themselves.

    *perceived* IOWS, it is imagined!!!!!!!!!

    Quoted message said:

    even though blinded
    testing has repeatedly shown that the intolerances are spurious.

    THAT'S IT THAT'S IT.

    *spurious*

    MORE good reasons to turn too alternative medicine.

    See a good alternative practitioner, they will not try to tell you, you are
    stupid, there is no such thing as MCS, quit imagining things, quit allowing
    yourself to be afflicted, quit trying to get gains from this non existent
    condition.

    Peter Moran is well brainwashed and doesn't know [censored] from tat.

    BARF!

    Jan

  5. Barrett Publicist, cross dressing Coward Ted Nidiffer's quacking
    omitted:

    Barrett on breast implants and MCS

    http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/quack-suppdeclaration.html

    Plaintiff Barrett proclaims, in ¶ 26 of his declaration, "I cannot
    recall any instance where I have publicly called anyone a quack."
    However, he maintains a website called "Quackwatch" and is often
    described as a "Quackbuster."

    His websites attack many reputable alternative medicine professionals
    (see Rosenthal Decl., ¶¶ 20-21). A review of Barrett's Curriculum
    Vitae (CV) attached to his declaration indicates that he has written,
    co-authored, or edited 21 publications with the word Quack or Quackery
    in the titles. As recently as April 2001, he was featured in a Time
    Magazine article entitled "The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks." (See
    Rosenthal Decl., Exhibit U.)

    I believe that a review of Barrett's and Polevoy's websites also
    illustrates that they publish their opinions and conclusions on
    medical issues as "facts" concerning on-going medical controversies
    such as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS), an illness that
    devastates the health of a high number of women with breast implants.
    As explained in my original declaration, ¶16, Barrett prematurely and,
    in my opinion, inaccurately, concludes "‘Multiple chemical
    sensitivity' is not a legitimate diagnosis." (Rosenthal Decl., Exhibit
    J, p. 6.)

    I was shocked that Barrett wrote of the clinical ecologists who
    believe in MCS, "most of them should have their licenses revoked."
    (See Ex. I to my original declaration.)

    I believe that if Barrett's position becomes accepted by the
    mainstream medical community, it would not only hinder women who are
    impacted by the effects of this debilitating illness from getting the
    help they need, it would also aid in the defense of the silicone
    manufacturers in the billion dollar lawsuits against them that
    continue today.

    Plaintiffs claim that my statements about them are not related to
    breast implant issues. (Opposition, 2:2-6). Barrett, in ¶15 of his
    declaration, also declares, "I do not have a ‘highly publicized
    viewpoint on the subject of breast implants'" and then states, "Nor
    have I been involved in any public controversy about them." However,
    page 21 of the 24-page report on "Multiple Chemical Sensitivity"
    (MCS), edited by Barrett, and widely disseminated by the American
    Council on Science and Health (ACSH), states "If the medical community
    accepts the diagnosis and theory of MCS, a wide range of industries
    could be seriously affected," and then lists the "silicone breast
    implant" makers as number 6 of the industries seriously affected. (See
    Exhibit A hereto for a true copy of excerpts of said report - opens
    PDF file.)

    Although according to Barrett's CV his training is as a psychiatrist,
    a review of Barrett's declaration and CV shows that he has been very
    active in putting his opinions regarding alternative medicine into the
    public domain. That is his right. I strongly believe that the public
    should be able to make informed decisions on health issues with as
    much information available as possible. This is particularly true with
    controversial issues such as MCS and breast implants, where chemical
    and silicone manufacturers have hired public relations firms to
    disseminate their viewpoints in the media. I post other viewpoints to
    appropriate newsgroups, bulletin boards and list-serves, as well as
    magazines and other media. At all times, plaintiffs could post their
    counter opinions on the newsgroups, their websites, or any other
    medium readily available to them.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Barrett 1000% LOST his case to me ... and as is the Quack / Junk
    Science Way ... sends out Cowards to attack those who embarass him and
    wages libel campaigns against them under their phoney aliases.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~

    www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.