Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!



M

Mike Vandeman

Guest
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
From: [a responsible citizen]
Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!

Eight million bikers can be wrong when it comes down to the welfare of the
environment. You can get the whole story on the Alpine Recreational Study on
the www.dnv.org site. Just scroll to it on the right hand side box.

On Wednesday night, a Parks and Natural Environment committee member showed us
some pictures of mountain bike structures, illegally built on our upper
mountain. What a pack of trash and vandalism in our forests. We are supposed
to go up there again with a parks ranger, and look at more this weekend. It is
time for a backlash against this eco-vandalism by the general public who are not
mountain bikers. It is a crying shame what they have done to our woods. By my
intuition, I have always said that what was happening in our little park
(Mountain View), was probably happening all over Mount Fromme. It seems I am
right. When I go up there, I plan to take a lot of pictures. One biker on our
committee said it would be bad judgement to go on a Saturday, as we would be
taking risk on "mountain biker territory"----WHA--? There, the truth. I sucked
in my breath, and glared. These people tell me I have no right to claim the
neighbourhood park for our neighbourhood, and yet tell me I will be "infringing"
on their "territory"? I was about to say something, but thought the better of
it, since it probably would have gotten me thrown off the committee, and I can
do more on the committee.

Some very dodgy things going on with the mountain bikers and the NSMBA. The
focus groups and Alpine Plan is an eye opener. Things were said like:

* Preserve unique nature of mountain bike experience. Standards can sterilize
experience. ( I take this to mean they do not wish to have rules, containment,
restriction, or enforcement)
This one is a real beauty, isn't it.

* Promote (North Shore Mountains) as a world class mountain bike destination.
(The district already is, so what else is new?)

* Need for mountain bike skills park for kids and youth. (One is already in the
plans; another is being looked at,etc. How many do they need??? And why do we
need to teach youth "skills" to rip up our wildlands? If they build mountain
bike "amusement" parks, and kept them out of our wild places, like skateboard
parks to keep skateboarders off the streets, I could see that working. ie. one
for the city, one for DNV and one for West Van.) -- but of course hell will
freeze over first before we get any mountain biker going for that..

There are liability issues; rescue services are overburdened by mountain bike
injuries. (North Shore Search and Rescue). Mountain bikers want free access,
free ride, and free everything,etc. Another stress on our wildlands last year
and this year is drought (believe it or not). So there is the added stress on
our flora and fauna created by perceived long term climatic changes. If we do
not get our usual April and May deluge of rain, forest closures could come up in
very early summer. Which may not be such a bad thing with regards to mountain
bikers and the upcoming mountain bike conference and festival. Frankly living
right next to the forest, I welcome anything that would prevent forest fires.
I'll keep you up to date.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
MV blurts:

>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
>From: [a responsible citizen]
>Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!


Mike - how many times are you going to try to pass yourself off as a
"responsible citizen?" We all know it's not the truth.
 
"Stephen Baker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> MV blurts:
>
> >Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
> >From: [a responsible citizen]
> >Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!

>
> Mike - how many times are you going to try to pass yourself off as a
> "responsible citizen?" We all know it's not the truth.
>

Who's Mike?
 
Stephen Baker wrote:
> MV blurts:
>
>
>>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
>>From: [a responsible citizen]
>>Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!

>
>
> Mike - how many times are you going to try to pass yourself off as a
> "responsible citizen?" We all know it's not the truth.
>
>

Misread that. Thought it said
"Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandamists!"
and I thought "Hell if I am".
;-)

Shawn
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> These people tell me I have no right to claim the
> neighbourhood park for our neighbourhood, and yet tell >me I will be

"infringing" on their "territory"?

I'm glad there's no one around here like that!
 
On 01 May 2004 01:35:35 GMT, [email protected]ospam (Stephen Baker) wrote:

..MV blurts:
..
..>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
..>From: [a responsible citizen]
..>Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!
..
..Mike - how many times are you going to try to pass yourself off as a
.."responsible citizen?" We all know it's not the truth.

That doesn't refer to me, idiot.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 01 May 2004 01:35:35 GMT, [email protected]ospam (Stephen Baker)

wrote:
>
> .MV blurts:
> .
> .>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
> .>From: [a responsible citizen]
> .>Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!
> .
> .Mike - how many times are you going to try to pass yourself off as a
> ."responsible citizen?" We all know it's not the truth.
>
> That doesn't refer to me, idiot.
> ===


Clearly. Mikey, no one should ever mistake you for a responsible citizen.
 
"Critic" <critic@***.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On 01 May 2004 01:35:35 GMT, [email protected]ospam (Stephen Baker)

> wrote:
> >
> > .MV blurts:
> > .
> > .>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
> > .>From: [a responsible citizen]
> > .>Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!
> > .
> > .Mike - how many times are you going to try to pass yourself off as a
> > ."responsible citizen?" We all know it's not the truth.
> >
> > That doesn't refer to me, idiot.
> > ===

>
> Clearly. Mikey, no one should ever mistake you for a responsible citizen.
>
>


As Larry the Cable Guy would say, "now that there's funny, I don't care who
you are."
 
"It is time for a backlash against this eco-vandalism by the general
public who are not mountain bikers."

I think it's terrible to accuse the non-mountain biking public of
eco-vandalism.


cheers

G
 
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
morons ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the last 900
Years fighting idiots and cretins.)
>>> Mike Vandeman<[email protected]> 4/30/2004 7:16:00 PM >>>


>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
>From: [a responsible citizen]
>Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!


To much of a ***** to sign the letter....hmmm

Churrnnnnnnn.....:(

kc
 
On Mon, 3 May 2004 07:08:43 -0600, Sweety <[email protected]> wrote:

..
..
..I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
..morons ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the last 900
..Years fighting idiots and cretins.)
..>>> Mike Vandeman<[email protected]> 4/30/2004 7:16:00 PM >>>
..
..>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:59:44 -0700
..>From: [a responsible citizen]
..>Subject: Re: Mountain Bikers are Eco-Vandalists!
..
..To much of a ***** to sign the letter....hmmm

He did sign it. I removed the name to keep him from being harassed and
threatened by mountain bikers.

..Churrnnnnnnn.....:(
..
..kc

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
<snipped for the sake reading that drivel>

What the hell is your problem man, how many other people are there like you?

Cycling is probably one of the most eco-friendly ways of getting about,
(apart from walking.) Mountain bikes are designed to be offroad, so why
does anyone have to destroy anything to get from a>b.
 
> That doesn't refer to me, idiot.

Then WTF are you posting that inane babble for?
 
On Mon, 3 May 2004 20:38:11 +0100, "Tetsuo Shima" <[email protected]>
wrote:

..<snipped for the sake reading that drivel>
..
..What the hell is your problem man, how many other people are there like you?
..
..Cycling is probably one of the most eco-friendly ways of getting about,
..(apart from walking.)

Yeah, as long as you stick to paved roads. It is by far the most destructive
activity that is allowed in any of our parks.

Mountain bikes are designed to be offroad, so why
..does anyone have to destroy anything to get from a>b.
..

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
Show me the proof.

I'm tired of this inane claptrap you're spouting, bikers damage if anything
is barely minimal You'd need billions upon billions of bikes to do the same
damage in one area as one company would need to destroy to build a factory
or make a carpark. Your argument is flawed and petty, post to some poor sap
who cares.
 
MV blurts out:

>.Cycling is probably one of the most eco-friendly ways of getting about,
>.(apart from walking.)
>
>Yeah, as long as you stick to paved roads. It is by far the most destructive
>activity that is allowed in any of our parks.
>
>


Yeah, right ahead ot ATV racing and 4x4 driving.
</sarcams>
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 3 May 2004 20:38:11 +0100, "Tetsuo Shima"

<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> .<snipped for the sake reading that drivel>
> .
> .What the hell is your problem man, how many other people are there like

you?
> .
> .Cycling is probably one of the most eco-friendly ways of getting about,
> .(apart from walking.)
>
> Yeah, as long as you stick to paved roads. It is by far the most

destructive
> activity that is allowed in any of our parks.


OPINION
>
> Mountain bikes are designed to be offroad, so why
> .does anyone have to destroy anything to get from a>b.
> .
>
> ===
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> On Mon, 3 May 2004 20:38:11 +0100, "Tetsuo Shima" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> .<snipped for the sake reading that drivel>
> .
> .What the hell is your problem man, how many other people are there like you?
> .
> .Cycling is probably one of the most eco-friendly ways of getting about,
> .(apart from walking.)
>
> Yeah, as long as you stick to paved roads. It is by far the most destructive
> activity that is allowed in any of our parks.


Oh Mikey, you forgot your other caveat- paved roads that cars don't
travel on...

You are not fooling anyone. We all know your crusade against mountain
bike as an environmental issue is false. You just don't want anyone
who might impact your "tranquil wilderness experience" to share the
parks or trails with you.

You are a pathetic excuse for a human being on the order of Geoff
Miller!

Go back under your rock, you POS!
 
On 04 May 2004 21:01:24 GMT, [email protected]ospam (Stephen Baker) wrote:

..MV blurts out:
..
..>.Cycling is probably one of the most eco-friendly ways of getting about,
..>.(apart from walking.)
..>
..>Yeah, as long as you stick to paved roads. It is by far the most destructive
..>activity that is allowed in any of our parks.
..>
..>
..
..Yeah, right ahead ot ATV racing and 4x4 driving.

Those aren't allowed in parks. DUH!

..</sarcams>
..

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On 6 May 2004 08:07:13 -0700, [email protected] (Mtbmike) wrote:

..Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
..> On Mon, 3 May 2004 20:38:11 +0100, "Tetsuo Shima" <[email protected]>
..> wrote:
..>
..> .<snipped for the sake reading that drivel>
..> .
..> .What the hell is your problem man, how many other people are there like you?
..> .
..> .Cycling is probably one of the most eco-friendly ways of getting about,
..> .(apart from walking.)
..>
..> Yeah, as long as you stick to paved roads. It is by far the most destructive
..> activity that is allowed in any of our parks.
..
..Oh Mikey, you forgot your other caveat- paved roads that cars don't
..travel on...
..
..You are not fooling anyone. We all know your crusade against mountain
..bike as an environmental issue is false. You just don't want anyone
..who might impact your "tranquil wilderness experience" to share the
..parks or trails with you.
..
..You are a pathetic excuse for a human being on the order of Geoff
..Miller!
..
..Go back under your rock, you POS!

Did you say something?
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande