Road Cycling · Public discussion

More Woe For Jan

Started by B. Lafferty · · Last activity · 4 posts · 410 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
8 July 2006
Last activity
9 July 2006
Original author
B. Lafferty
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
410
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20060708_203832Dev.html

    Another month of this and he'll be as big as the CyclingNews blimp.

  2. Ullrich again noted

    According to German magazine DER Spiegel to appear Monday, Jan Ullrich is
    indeed implied in the business of doping which shakes the world of cycling
    since the calling into question of Doctor Eufemanio Fuentes by an
    investigation of the Civil Guard.

    The magazine explains why Rudy Pevenage, the sporting director of the
    T-Mobile, the team of Jan Ullrich, would have telephoned to the Spanish
    doctor for him to say "to have spoken with a third person. This third
    person is interested to have more, even if it is only half." However, if
    one believes the weekly magazine of it, this "third person" would be clearly
    Jan Ullrich but Rudy Peverage had said itself that "the third person had
    gained" on May 18th, the day the German had a stage victory in the Giro d'Italia.

    Pevenage and Fuentes would have in fact, always according to the weekly
    magazine, desired to get for Ullrich an additional amount of blood. In the
    file opened by the Spanish investigators, it would be also a question of a
    "Jan" which would have paid 2970 euros to be supplied in "Vino, Nino,
    Ignacio and PCH" is blood, growth hormones, a preparation close to insulin
    and testosterone.

    Jan Ullrich, former winner of the Tour de France, had been suspended by his
    team the day before of the departure of the edition 2006.

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20060708_203832Dev.html

    Another month of this and he'll be as big as the CyclingNews blimp.

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, B.

    Lafferty (') said:

    http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20060708_203832Dev.html

    Another month of this and he'll be as big as the CyclingNews blimp.

    There's nothing new in this piece, is there? It's just rehashing stuff we
    know already.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    'there are no solutions, only precipitates'

  4. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, B.

    Lafferty (') said:

    http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20060708_203832Dev.html

    Another month of this and he'll be as big as the CyclingNews blimp.

    There's nothing new in this piece, is there? It's just rehashing stuff we
    know already.

    It's a report of yet another phone call. It's a new bit of evidence
    that's come to light. No new information however, just confirmation.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 1 guest ·0 bots ·1 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.