Triathlon · Public discussion

monster challenge results, am I missing something here?

Started by Jian Peng · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,023 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Triathlon
Published
5 June 2003
Last activity
5 June 2003
Original author
Jian Peng
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,023
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am thinking of getting into triathlon so I spent sometime surfing related sites. I learned that
    the winner of the 2003 world cup finished in 1:48:36. Then I came across the 2002 results of
    monster challenge in Boston, where the top 36 finishers' time is under 1:48:00, and the winner's
    time is 1:41:41. The monster challenge is a USAT sanctioned event, so why the large difference in
    time? Thanks!

    J

    --
    And the meaning of live is a mystery though we live it from day to day. But the music of life should
    be harmony so that anyone here can play. ---"Freudiana"

  2. Here are the links:

    olympic.orgfull story uk.asp
    coolrunning.comSep1 Monste 1 set1.shtml

    --
    And the meaning of live is a mystery though we live it from day to day. But the music of life should
    be harmony so that anyone here can play. ---"Freudiana"

  3. Jian Peng said:

    I am thinking of getting into triathlon so I spent sometime surfing related sites. I learned that
    the winner of the 2003 world cup finished in 1:48:36. Then I came across the 2002 results of
    monster challenge in Boston, where the top 36 finishers' time is under 1:48:00, and the winner's
    time is 1:41:41. The monster challenge is a USAT sanctioned event, so why the large difference in
    time? Thanks!

    J

    Triathlon courses in general aren't certified distances. Even world championships allow +- 10% of
    the "Standard" distance. A tri course is what it is. The feeling is as long as everyone does the
    same course it's a fair race. I've never been to (or even heard of) the Monster Challenge but my
    guess is that if it's supposed to be a stardard 1500M-40K-10K, it ain't.

    JJ

    JJ

  4. JJ Waguespack said:
    Jian Peng said:

    I am thinking of getting into triathlon so I spent sometime surfing related sites. I learned that
    the winner of the 2003 world cup finished in 1:48:36. Then I came across the 2002 results of
    monster challenge in Boston, where the top 36 finishers' time is under 1:48:00, and the winner's
    time is 1:41:41. The monster challenge is a USAT sanctioned event, so why the large difference in
    time? Thanks!

    J

    Triathlon courses in general aren't certified distances. Even world championships allow +- 10% of
    the "Standard" distance. A tri course is what it is. The feeling is as long as everyone does the
    same course it's a fair race. I've never been to (or even heard of) the Monster Challenge but my
    guess is that if it's supposed to be a stardard 1500M-40K-10K, it ain't.

    JJ

    JJ

    I not familar with course either, but course differences themselves make a huge differences
    in time. You have tough tri courses just like you have tough run or bike courses.

    ~Matt

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.